两种激光辅助表皮消融技术对自体非培养表皮细胞悬浮移植联合窄带紫外线B光疗治疗稳定性白癜风疗效的影响:回顾性研究。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Bing Han, Yuanyuan Liu, Yang Song, Henan Si, Shanshan Li, Lei Yao
{"title":"两种激光辅助表皮消融技术对自体非培养表皮细胞悬浮移植联合窄带紫外线B光疗治疗稳定性白癜风疗效的影响:回顾性研究。","authors":"Bing Han, Yuanyuan Liu, Yang Song, Henan Si, Shanshan Li, Lei Yao","doi":"10.1002/lsm.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Autologous non-cultured epidermal cell suspension (NECS) transplantation is an effective therapeutic approach for managing stable vitiligo, and laser-assisted epidermal ablation is a common recipient area preparation procedure before NECS transplantation. We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of two different lasers used in NECS transplantation combined with narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) therapy for treatment of stable vitiligo.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 63 white macules in 54 patients with stable vitiligo were assessed for the repigmentation rate and any adverse effects associated with NECS transplantation combined with NB-UVB therapy at 1, 3, and 6 months post-transplantation. The epidermis was ablated using either a Kinglaser CO2 fractional laser used in the fully ablative mode at 100% coverage (KL) or an ultra-pulse CO2 laser (UL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the 6-month follow-up, the repigmentation rates in the KL group were graded as excellent in 28.6%, good in 9.5%, fair in 42.9%, and poor in 19.0%, giving an effective rate of 38.1%. In the UL group, the rates were graded as 73.8%, 14.3%, 7.1%, and 4.8%, respectively, giving an effective rate of 88.1% (p < 0.001). The Visual Analog Scale score for pain during the laser-assisted epidermal ablation was higher in the UL group than in the KL group (p < 0.0001). The UL group had a significantly higher incidence of mild to moderate persistent erythema at 1 month post-transplantation than the KL group (p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UL can achieve better repigmentation efficacy than KL when used for epidermal ablation during NECS transplantation plus NB-UVB therapy in patients with stable vitiligo. However, regarding adverse events, the UL procedure is more painful and has a higher incidence of mild to moderate persistent erythema during the early postoperative period. Larger studies are required to assess the impacts of various laser de-epidermalization techniques on the efficacy of NECS transplantation for stable vitiligo.</p>","PeriodicalId":17961,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacts of Two Laser-Assisted Epidermal Ablation Techniques on the Efficacy of Autologous Non-Cultured Epidermal Cell Suspension Transplantation Plus Narrowband Ultraviolet B Phototherapy for the Treatment of Stable Vitiligo: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Bing Han, Yuanyuan Liu, Yang Song, Henan Si, Shanshan Li, Lei Yao\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/lsm.70018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Autologous non-cultured epidermal cell suspension (NECS) transplantation is an effective therapeutic approach for managing stable vitiligo, and laser-assisted epidermal ablation is a common recipient area preparation procedure before NECS transplantation. We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of two different lasers used in NECS transplantation combined with narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) therapy for treatment of stable vitiligo.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 63 white macules in 54 patients with stable vitiligo were assessed for the repigmentation rate and any adverse effects associated with NECS transplantation combined with NB-UVB therapy at 1, 3, and 6 months post-transplantation. The epidermis was ablated using either a Kinglaser CO2 fractional laser used in the fully ablative mode at 100% coverage (KL) or an ultra-pulse CO2 laser (UL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the 6-month follow-up, the repigmentation rates in the KL group were graded as excellent in 28.6%, good in 9.5%, fair in 42.9%, and poor in 19.0%, giving an effective rate of 38.1%. In the UL group, the rates were graded as 73.8%, 14.3%, 7.1%, and 4.8%, respectively, giving an effective rate of 88.1% (p < 0.001). The Visual Analog Scale score for pain during the laser-assisted epidermal ablation was higher in the UL group than in the KL group (p < 0.0001). The UL group had a significantly higher incidence of mild to moderate persistent erythema at 1 month post-transplantation than the KL group (p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UL can achieve better repigmentation efficacy than KL when used for epidermal ablation during NECS transplantation plus NB-UVB therapy in patients with stable vitiligo. However, regarding adverse events, the UL procedure is more painful and has a higher incidence of mild to moderate persistent erythema during the early postoperative period. Larger studies are required to assess the impacts of various laser de-epidermalization techniques on the efficacy of NECS transplantation for stable vitiligo.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.70018\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.70018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:自体非培养表皮细胞悬液(NECS)移植是治疗稳定型白癜风的有效方法,激光辅助表皮消融是NECS移植前常见的受体区准备程序。我们试图比较两种不同的激光用于NECS移植联合窄带紫外线B (NB-UVB)治疗稳定型白癜风的疗效和安全性。材料和方法:在这项回顾性研究中,对54例稳定型白癜风患者的63个白斑进行了移植后1、3和6个月的再色素沉着率和与nec移植联合NB-UVB治疗相关的任何不良反应进行了评估。采用100%覆盖(KL)完全消融模式下的Kinglaser CO2分式激光器或超脉冲CO2激光器(UL)消融表皮。结果:随访6个月,KL组的重色素评分为优(28.6%)、良(9.5%)、一般(42.9%)、差(19.0%),有效率38.1%。在UL组中,有效率分别为73.8%、14.3%、7.1%和4.8%,有效率为88.1% (p)。结论:在稳定型白癜风患者中,使用UL进行NECS移植过程中表皮消融联合NB-UVB治疗时,UL的重色素效果优于KL。然而,在不良事件方面,UL手术更痛苦,术后早期出现轻至中度持续性红斑的发生率更高。需要更大规模的研究来评估各种激光去表皮化技术对NECS移植治疗稳定型白癜风疗效的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impacts of Two Laser-Assisted Epidermal Ablation Techniques on the Efficacy of Autologous Non-Cultured Epidermal Cell Suspension Transplantation Plus Narrowband Ultraviolet B Phototherapy for the Treatment of Stable Vitiligo: A Retrospective Study.

Objectives: Autologous non-cultured epidermal cell suspension (NECS) transplantation is an effective therapeutic approach for managing stable vitiligo, and laser-assisted epidermal ablation is a common recipient area preparation procedure before NECS transplantation. We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of two different lasers used in NECS transplantation combined with narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) therapy for treatment of stable vitiligo.

Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, 63 white macules in 54 patients with stable vitiligo were assessed for the repigmentation rate and any adverse effects associated with NECS transplantation combined with NB-UVB therapy at 1, 3, and 6 months post-transplantation. The epidermis was ablated using either a Kinglaser CO2 fractional laser used in the fully ablative mode at 100% coverage (KL) or an ultra-pulse CO2 laser (UL).

Results: At the 6-month follow-up, the repigmentation rates in the KL group were graded as excellent in 28.6%, good in 9.5%, fair in 42.9%, and poor in 19.0%, giving an effective rate of 38.1%. In the UL group, the rates were graded as 73.8%, 14.3%, 7.1%, and 4.8%, respectively, giving an effective rate of 88.1% (p < 0.001). The Visual Analog Scale score for pain during the laser-assisted epidermal ablation was higher in the UL group than in the KL group (p < 0.0001). The UL group had a significantly higher incidence of mild to moderate persistent erythema at 1 month post-transplantation than the KL group (p = 0.002).

Conclusions: UL can achieve better repigmentation efficacy than KL when used for epidermal ablation during NECS transplantation plus NB-UVB therapy in patients with stable vitiligo. However, regarding adverse events, the UL procedure is more painful and has a higher incidence of mild to moderate persistent erythema during the early postoperative period. Larger studies are required to assess the impacts of various laser de-epidermalization techniques on the efficacy of NECS transplantation for stable vitiligo.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Lasers in Surgery and Medicine publishes the highest quality research and clinical manuscripts in areas relating to the use of lasers in medicine and biology. The journal publishes basic and clinical studies on the therapeutic and diagnostic use of lasers in all the surgical and medical specialties. Contributions regarding clinical trials, new therapeutic techniques or instrumentation, laser biophysics and bioengineering, photobiology and photochemistry, outcomes research, cost-effectiveness, and other aspects of biomedicine are welcome. Using a process of rigorous yet rapid review of submitted manuscripts, findings of high scientific and medical interest are published with a minimum delay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信