{"title":"经皮4.5 fr半刚性输尿管镜在仰卧位微创内镜联合肾内手术中建立贯通导丝通道的作用及疗效单一机构的回顾性研究。","authors":"Takaaki Inoue, Shuzo Hamamoto, Shinsuke Okada, Naoto Tanaka, Fukashi Yamamichi, Masaichiro Fujita, Hideaki Miyake","doi":"10.1111/iju.70099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of using a percutaneous 4.5-Fr semi-rigid ureteroscope (4.5-rURS) and preoperative clinical factors in the performance of the through-and-through guidewire technique (T&TGW) under the guidance of retrograde flexible ureteroscope (fURS)-assisted fluoroscopy during minimally invasive endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (mini-ECIRS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 123 patients who underwent mini-ECIRS with percutaneous 4.5-rURS assistance for large kidney stones in the flank-free modified Valdivia position were retrospectively evaluated. The primary outcome was the achievement rate of T&TGW, defined as percutaneous insertion of a guidewire that passed down the ureter and exited outside the external urethral meatus. The secondary outcome was the rate of percutaneous 4.5-rURS assistance required to successfully perform T&TGW.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stone-free rate was 81.2%, including no residual fragments in 72.3% of patients. T&TGW was successful in 119 (96.6%) patients, which was necessary using retrograde fURS-assisted fluoroscopic guidance in 61 (49.5%) patients, whereas 4.5-rURS assistance was required in 58 (47.1%) patients. Guidewire migration under the renal pelvis mucosa was found in 10 (8.1%) patients. Preoperative factors associated with failed T&TGW using retrograde fURS-assisted fluoroscopic guidance were the puncture site in the lower calyx (odds ratio, 0.125; confidence interval, 0.043-0.364; p = 0.001) and the presence of preoperative hydronephrosis in the renal calyx of the puncture site (odds ratio, 0.261; confidence interval, 0.093-0.730; p = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Percutaneous 4.5-rURS assistance facilitated successful T&TGW in cases of failed access under retrograde fURS-assisted fluoroscopic guidance in supine mini-ECIRS and a useful option to find a migrated guidewire in the wrong direction.</p>","PeriodicalId":14323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role and Efficacy of Percutaneous 4.5-Fr Semi-Rigid Ureteroscope While Creating Through-And-Through Guidewire Passage During Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery in the Supine Position; Retrospective Study at a Single Institution.\",\"authors\":\"Takaaki Inoue, Shuzo Hamamoto, Shinsuke Okada, Naoto Tanaka, Fukashi Yamamichi, Masaichiro Fujita, Hideaki Miyake\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/iju.70099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of using a percutaneous 4.5-Fr semi-rigid ureteroscope (4.5-rURS) and preoperative clinical factors in the performance of the through-and-through guidewire technique (T&TGW) under the guidance of retrograde flexible ureteroscope (fURS)-assisted fluoroscopy during minimally invasive endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (mini-ECIRS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 123 patients who underwent mini-ECIRS with percutaneous 4.5-rURS assistance for large kidney stones in the flank-free modified Valdivia position were retrospectively evaluated. The primary outcome was the achievement rate of T&TGW, defined as percutaneous insertion of a guidewire that passed down the ureter and exited outside the external urethral meatus. The secondary outcome was the rate of percutaneous 4.5-rURS assistance required to successfully perform T&TGW.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stone-free rate was 81.2%, including no residual fragments in 72.3% of patients. T&TGW was successful in 119 (96.6%) patients, which was necessary using retrograde fURS-assisted fluoroscopic guidance in 61 (49.5%) patients, whereas 4.5-rURS assistance was required in 58 (47.1%) patients. Guidewire migration under the renal pelvis mucosa was found in 10 (8.1%) patients. Preoperative factors associated with failed T&TGW using retrograde fURS-assisted fluoroscopic guidance were the puncture site in the lower calyx (odds ratio, 0.125; confidence interval, 0.043-0.364; p = 0.001) and the presence of preoperative hydronephrosis in the renal calyx of the puncture site (odds ratio, 0.261; confidence interval, 0.093-0.730; p = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Percutaneous 4.5-rURS assistance facilitated successful T&TGW in cases of failed access under retrograde fURS-assisted fluoroscopic guidance in supine mini-ECIRS and a useful option to find a migrated guidewire in the wrong direction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.70099\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.70099","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Role and Efficacy of Percutaneous 4.5-Fr Semi-Rigid Ureteroscope While Creating Through-And-Through Guidewire Passage During Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery in the Supine Position; Retrospective Study at a Single Institution.
Objective: This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of using a percutaneous 4.5-Fr semi-rigid ureteroscope (4.5-rURS) and preoperative clinical factors in the performance of the through-and-through guidewire technique (T&TGW) under the guidance of retrograde flexible ureteroscope (fURS)-assisted fluoroscopy during minimally invasive endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (mini-ECIRS).
Methods: In total, 123 patients who underwent mini-ECIRS with percutaneous 4.5-rURS assistance for large kidney stones in the flank-free modified Valdivia position were retrospectively evaluated. The primary outcome was the achievement rate of T&TGW, defined as percutaneous insertion of a guidewire that passed down the ureter and exited outside the external urethral meatus. The secondary outcome was the rate of percutaneous 4.5-rURS assistance required to successfully perform T&TGW.
Results: The stone-free rate was 81.2%, including no residual fragments in 72.3% of patients. T&TGW was successful in 119 (96.6%) patients, which was necessary using retrograde fURS-assisted fluoroscopic guidance in 61 (49.5%) patients, whereas 4.5-rURS assistance was required in 58 (47.1%) patients. Guidewire migration under the renal pelvis mucosa was found in 10 (8.1%) patients. Preoperative factors associated with failed T&TGW using retrograde fURS-assisted fluoroscopic guidance were the puncture site in the lower calyx (odds ratio, 0.125; confidence interval, 0.043-0.364; p = 0.001) and the presence of preoperative hydronephrosis in the renal calyx of the puncture site (odds ratio, 0.261; confidence interval, 0.093-0.730; p = 0.011).
Conclusion: Percutaneous 4.5-rURS assistance facilitated successful T&TGW in cases of failed access under retrograde fURS-assisted fluoroscopic guidance in supine mini-ECIRS and a useful option to find a migrated guidewire in the wrong direction.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Urology is the official English language journal of the Japanese Urological Association, publishing articles of scientific excellence in urology. Submissions of papers from all countries are considered for publication. All manuscripts are subject to peer review and are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation.