提高生物阻抗光谱分析淋巴水肿和脂水肿评估的精度。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Leigh C Ward, Katrina Gaitatzis, Belinda Thompson, Vincent Singh Paramanandam, Louise A Koelmeyer
{"title":"提高生物阻抗光谱分析淋巴水肿和脂水肿评估的精度。","authors":"Leigh C Ward, Katrina Gaitatzis, Belinda Thompson, Vincent Singh Paramanandam, Louise A Koelmeyer","doi":"10.1089/lrb.2024.0086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is commonly used for the detection and monitoring of lymphedema and potentially lipedema. BIS measures limb electrical resistance, which decreases with fluid accumulation in these conditions. R0, the index of extracellular fluid and lymph accumulation, is typically estimated using Cole modeling, but technical and biological factors can affect accuracy. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Participants with clinically affirmed bilateral leg lymphedema, lipedema, self-ascribed swelling, and healthy controls were included in this study. Impedance measurements were taken using a stand-on BIS device, and R0 was estimated using both the Cole modeling method and a regression approach. Quality of data fitting was assessed visually and statistically. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Control participants were younger and lighter compared with the clinical groups. The regression method was able to analyze 100% of participant data, whereas the Cole method was successful in only 80%-88% of cases in the lymphedema and lipedema groups. Additionally, the regression approach provided better curve fitting accuracy for all participants. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The regression method offers a robust alternative for estimating R0 values in BIS data, especially in lower limb assessments where data analysis is challenging. The small difference between methods in absolute R0 values (2.5%) has minimal practical implications, suggesting interchangeability in data analysis. The Cole method showed poorer performance, particularly in participants with lymphedema, possibly due to differences in water proportions and limb size. Overall, the regression method can be effectively used in clinical practice for estimating R0 values in BIS data, offering a more accurate and reliable approach than traditional Cole plotting methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":18168,"journal":{"name":"Lymphatic research and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Precision of Bioimpedance Spectroscopic Analysis for Lymphedema and Lipedema Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Leigh C Ward, Katrina Gaitatzis, Belinda Thompson, Vincent Singh Paramanandam, Louise A Koelmeyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/lrb.2024.0086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is commonly used for the detection and monitoring of lymphedema and potentially lipedema. BIS measures limb electrical resistance, which decreases with fluid accumulation in these conditions. R0, the index of extracellular fluid and lymph accumulation, is typically estimated using Cole modeling, but technical and biological factors can affect accuracy. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Participants with clinically affirmed bilateral leg lymphedema, lipedema, self-ascribed swelling, and healthy controls were included in this study. Impedance measurements were taken using a stand-on BIS device, and R0 was estimated using both the Cole modeling method and a regression approach. Quality of data fitting was assessed visually and statistically. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Control participants were younger and lighter compared with the clinical groups. The regression method was able to analyze 100% of participant data, whereas the Cole method was successful in only 80%-88% of cases in the lymphedema and lipedema groups. Additionally, the regression approach provided better curve fitting accuracy for all participants. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The regression method offers a robust alternative for estimating R0 values in BIS data, especially in lower limb assessments where data analysis is challenging. The small difference between methods in absolute R0 values (2.5%) has minimal practical implications, suggesting interchangeability in data analysis. The Cole method showed poorer performance, particularly in participants with lymphedema, possibly due to differences in water proportions and limb size. Overall, the regression method can be effectively used in clinical practice for estimating R0 values in BIS data, offering a more accurate and reliable approach than traditional Cole plotting methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lymphatic research and biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lymphatic research and biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2024.0086\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lymphatic research and biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2024.0086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:生物阻抗谱(BIS)通常用于检测和监测淋巴水肿和潜在的脂质水肿。BIS测量肢体电阻,在这些情况下,随着液体积聚,肢体电阻降低。R0是细胞外液和淋巴积聚的指数,通常使用Cole模型来估计,但技术和生物因素会影响准确性。方法:将临床确认的双侧腿淋巴水肿、脂质水肿、自认为肿胀的参与者和健康对照者纳入本研究。阻抗测量使用站立式BIS设备,R0使用Cole建模方法和回归方法估计。对数据拟合质量进行目测和统计评估。结果:与临床组相比,对照组参与者更年轻,体重更轻。回归方法能够分析100%的参与者数据,而Cole方法在淋巴水肿和脂水肿组中仅成功分析80%-88%的病例。此外,回归方法为所有参与者提供了更好的曲线拟合精度。结论:回归方法为估计BIS数据中的R0值提供了一个可靠的替代方法,特别是在数据分析具有挑战性的下肢评估中。两种方法在绝对R0值上的微小差异(2.5%)具有最小的实际意义,表明数据分析中的互换性。Cole方法表现出较差的效果,特别是在有淋巴水肿的参与者中,可能是由于水的比例和肢体大小的差异。总的来说,回归方法可以有效地用于临床实践中估计BIS数据中的R0值,比传统的Cole绘制方法提供了更准确和可靠的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving Precision of Bioimpedance Spectroscopic Analysis for Lymphedema and Lipedema Assessment.

Background: Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is commonly used for the detection and monitoring of lymphedema and potentially lipedema. BIS measures limb electrical resistance, which decreases with fluid accumulation in these conditions. R0, the index of extracellular fluid and lymph accumulation, is typically estimated using Cole modeling, but technical and biological factors can affect accuracy. Methods: Participants with clinically affirmed bilateral leg lymphedema, lipedema, self-ascribed swelling, and healthy controls were included in this study. Impedance measurements were taken using a stand-on BIS device, and R0 was estimated using both the Cole modeling method and a regression approach. Quality of data fitting was assessed visually and statistically. Results: Control participants were younger and lighter compared with the clinical groups. The regression method was able to analyze 100% of participant data, whereas the Cole method was successful in only 80%-88% of cases in the lymphedema and lipedema groups. Additionally, the regression approach provided better curve fitting accuracy for all participants. Conclusion: The regression method offers a robust alternative for estimating R0 values in BIS data, especially in lower limb assessments where data analysis is challenging. The small difference between methods in absolute R0 values (2.5%) has minimal practical implications, suggesting interchangeability in data analysis. The Cole method showed poorer performance, particularly in participants with lymphedema, possibly due to differences in water proportions and limb size. Overall, the regression method can be effectively used in clinical practice for estimating R0 values in BIS data, offering a more accurate and reliable approach than traditional Cole plotting methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lymphatic research and biology
Lymphatic research and biology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Lymphatic Research and Biology delivers the most current peer-reviewed advances and developments in lymphatic biology and pathology from the world’s leading biomedical investigators. The Journal provides original research from a broad range of investigative disciplines, including genetics, biochemistry and biophysics, cellular and molecular biology, physiology and pharmacology, anatomy, developmental biology, and pathology. Lymphatic Research and Biology coverage includes: -Vasculogenesis and angiogenesis -Genetics of lymphatic disorders -Human lymphatic disease, including lymphatic insufficiency and associated vascular anomalies -Physiology of intestinal fluid and protein balance -Immunosurveillance and immune cell trafficking -Tumor biology and metastasis -Pharmacology -Lymphatic imaging -Endothelial and smooth muscle cell biology -Inflammation, infection, and autoimmune disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信