初级保健团队资金,补偿和实践模式跨加拿大司法管辖区:环境扫描。

Sarah Spencer, Lindsay Hedden, Julia Lukewich, Maria Mathews, Marie-Eve Poitras, Cloé Beaulieu, Tai Hollingbery, Leslie Meredith, Dana Ryan, Vanessa T Vaillancourt, Emily Gard Marshall, Nelly D Oelke, Joan Tranmer
{"title":"初级保健团队资金,补偿和实践模式跨加拿大司法管辖区:环境扫描。","authors":"Sarah Spencer, Lindsay Hedden, Julia Lukewich, Maria Mathews, Marie-Eve Poitras, Cloé Beaulieu, Tai Hollingbery, Leslie Meredith, Dana Ryan, Vanessa T Vaillancourt, Emily Gard Marshall, Nelly D Oelke, Joan Tranmer","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2025.27552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Successive waves of primary care reforms have focused on expanding team-based care across Canada, frequently through the addition of registered nurses (RNs). Reforms have varied, however, in teams' funding, compensation and organization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this environmental scan, we sought to identify and describe existing primary care compensation and practice models across Canada.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through structured and snowball searching, we identified and extracted data from 189 sources, yielding 44 compensation models and 55 practice models.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While information on RNs' compensation was lacking, physician remuneration and practice model descriptions indicate substantial variation in funding, compensation and practice models where integration of RNs is occurring. This reflects ongoing primary care reforms that build upon heterogenous plans and existing systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Amidst ongoing calls to expand team-based primary care, the lack of clarity around existing funding, compensation and practice models challenges our ability to evaluate the aspects of team-based care that contribute to their overall functioning and effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":520294,"journal":{"name":"Nursing leadership (Toronto, Ont.)","volume":"37 SP","pages":"59-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary Care Team Funding, Compensation and Practice Models Across Canadian Jurisdictions: An Environmental Scan.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Spencer, Lindsay Hedden, Julia Lukewich, Maria Mathews, Marie-Eve Poitras, Cloé Beaulieu, Tai Hollingbery, Leslie Meredith, Dana Ryan, Vanessa T Vaillancourt, Emily Gard Marshall, Nelly D Oelke, Joan Tranmer\",\"doi\":\"10.12927/cjnl.2025.27552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Successive waves of primary care reforms have focused on expanding team-based care across Canada, frequently through the addition of registered nurses (RNs). Reforms have varied, however, in teams' funding, compensation and organization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this environmental scan, we sought to identify and describe existing primary care compensation and practice models across Canada.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through structured and snowball searching, we identified and extracted data from 189 sources, yielding 44 compensation models and 55 practice models.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While information on RNs' compensation was lacking, physician remuneration and practice model descriptions indicate substantial variation in funding, compensation and practice models where integration of RNs is occurring. This reflects ongoing primary care reforms that build upon heterogenous plans and existing systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Amidst ongoing calls to expand team-based primary care, the lack of clarity around existing funding, compensation and practice models challenges our ability to evaluate the aspects of team-based care that contribute to their overall functioning and effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing leadership (Toronto, Ont.)\",\"volume\":\"37 SP\",\"pages\":\"59-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing leadership (Toronto, Ont.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12927/cjnl.2025.27552\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing leadership (Toronto, Ont.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/cjnl.2025.27552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:初级保健改革的连续浪潮集中在扩大团队为基础的护理在加拿大,经常通过增加注册护士(rn)。然而,改革在团队的资金、薪酬和组织方面各不相同。方法:在这次环境扫描中,我们试图识别和描述加拿大现有的初级保健补偿和实践模式。结果:通过结构化搜索和滚雪球搜索,我们从189个来源中识别和提取数据,得到44个补偿模型和55个实践模型。讨论:虽然缺乏关于注册护士薪酬的信息,但医生薪酬和执业模式描述表明,在注册护士整合发生的地方,资金、薪酬和执业模式存在实质性变化。这反映了正在进行的初级保健改革是建立在不同的计划和现有系统的基础上的。结论:在不断呼吁扩大团队为基础的初级保健,缺乏明确的现有资金,补偿和实践模式挑战我们的能力评估方面的团队为基础的护理,有助于其整体功能和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Primary Care Team Funding, Compensation and Practice Models Across Canadian Jurisdictions: An Environmental Scan.

Introduction: Successive waves of primary care reforms have focused on expanding team-based care across Canada, frequently through the addition of registered nurses (RNs). Reforms have varied, however, in teams' funding, compensation and organization.

Methods: In this environmental scan, we sought to identify and describe existing primary care compensation and practice models across Canada.

Results: Through structured and snowball searching, we identified and extracted data from 189 sources, yielding 44 compensation models and 55 practice models.

Discussion: While information on RNs' compensation was lacking, physician remuneration and practice model descriptions indicate substantial variation in funding, compensation and practice models where integration of RNs is occurring. This reflects ongoing primary care reforms that build upon heterogenous plans and existing systems.

Conclusion: Amidst ongoing calls to expand team-based primary care, the lack of clarity around existing funding, compensation and practice models challenges our ability to evaluate the aspects of team-based care that contribute to their overall functioning and effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信