从戒烟到体育活动:基于本体的自动证据合成方法能否在行为改变领域得到推广?

Q1 Medicine
Wellcome Open Research Pub Date : 2025-03-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21664.2
Oscar Castro, Emma Norris, Alison J Wright, Emily Hayes, Ella Howes, Candice Moore, Robert West, Susan Michie
{"title":"从戒烟到体育活动:基于本体的自动证据合成方法能否在行为改变领域得到推广?","authors":"Oscar Castro, Emma Norris, Alison J Wright, Emily Hayes, Ella Howes, Candice Moore, Robert West, Susan Michie","doi":"10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21664.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Developing behaviour change interventions able to tackle major challenges such as non-communicable diseases or climate change requires effective and efficient use of scientific evidence. The Human Behaviour-Change Project (HBCP) aims to improve evidence synthesis in behavioural science by compiling intervention reports and annotating them with an ontology to train information extraction and prediction algorithms. The HBCP used smoking cessation as the first 'proof of concept' domain but intends to extend its methodology to other behaviours. The aims of this paper are to (i) assess the extent to which methods developed for annotating smoking cessation intervention reports were generalisable to a corpus of physical activity evidence, and (ii) describe the steps involved in developing this second HBCP corpus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The development of the physical activity corpus involved: (i) reviewing the suitability of smoking cessation codes already used in the HBCP, (ii) defining the selection criteria and scope, (iii) identifying and screening records for inclusion, and (iv) annotating intervention reports using a code set of 200+ entities from the Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stage 1 highlighted the need to modify the smoking cessation behavioural outcome codes for application to physical activity. One hundred physical activity intervention reports were reviewed, and 11 physical activity experts were consulted to inform the adapted code set. Stage 2 involved narrowing down the scope of the corpus to interventions targeting moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. In stage 3, 111 physical activity intervention reports were identified, which were then annotated in stage 4.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Smoking cessation annotation methods developed as part of the HBCP were mostly transferable to the physical activity domain. However, the codes applied to behavioural outcome variables required adaptations. This paper can help anyone interested in building a body of research to develop automated evidence synthesis methods in physical activity or for other behaviours.</p>","PeriodicalId":23677,"journal":{"name":"Wellcome Open Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11992510/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From smoking cessation to physical activity: Can ontology-based methods for automated evidence synthesis generalise across behaviour change domains?\",\"authors\":\"Oscar Castro, Emma Norris, Alison J Wright, Emily Hayes, Ella Howes, Candice Moore, Robert West, Susan Michie\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21664.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Developing behaviour change interventions able to tackle major challenges such as non-communicable diseases or climate change requires effective and efficient use of scientific evidence. The Human Behaviour-Change Project (HBCP) aims to improve evidence synthesis in behavioural science by compiling intervention reports and annotating them with an ontology to train information extraction and prediction algorithms. The HBCP used smoking cessation as the first 'proof of concept' domain but intends to extend its methodology to other behaviours. The aims of this paper are to (i) assess the extent to which methods developed for annotating smoking cessation intervention reports were generalisable to a corpus of physical activity evidence, and (ii) describe the steps involved in developing this second HBCP corpus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The development of the physical activity corpus involved: (i) reviewing the suitability of smoking cessation codes already used in the HBCP, (ii) defining the selection criteria and scope, (iii) identifying and screening records for inclusion, and (iv) annotating intervention reports using a code set of 200+ entities from the Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stage 1 highlighted the need to modify the smoking cessation behavioural outcome codes for application to physical activity. One hundred physical activity intervention reports were reviewed, and 11 physical activity experts were consulted to inform the adapted code set. Stage 2 involved narrowing down the scope of the corpus to interventions targeting moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. In stage 3, 111 physical activity intervention reports were identified, which were then annotated in stage 4.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Smoking cessation annotation methods developed as part of the HBCP were mostly transferable to the physical activity domain. However, the codes applied to behavioural outcome variables required adaptations. This paper can help anyone interested in building a body of research to develop automated evidence synthesis methods in physical activity or for other behaviours.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wellcome Open Research\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11992510/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wellcome Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21664.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellcome Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21664.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:制定能够应对非传染性疾病或气候变化等重大挑战的行为改变干预措施需要有效和高效地利用科学证据。人类行为改变项目(HBCP)旨在通过编写干预报告并使用本体注释来训练信息提取和预测算法,从而改善行为科学中的证据综合。HBCP将戒烟作为第一个“概念证明”领域,但打算将其方法扩展到其他行为。本文的目的是(i)评估用于注释戒烟干预报告的方法在多大程度上可推广到身体活动证据语料库,以及(ii)描述开发第二个HBCP语料库所涉及的步骤。方法:身体活动语料库的开发涉及:(i)审查HBCP中已经使用的戒烟代码的适用性,(ii)定义选择标准和范围,(iii)识别和筛选纳入的记录,以及(iv)使用行为改变干预本体的200多个实体代码集注释干预报告。结果:第一阶段强调需要修改戒烟行为结果代码以应用于身体活动。审查了100份身体活动干预报告,并咨询了11位身体活动专家,以告知适应的代码集。第二阶段涉及将语料库的范围缩小到针对中度到剧烈身体活动的干预措施。在第3阶段,确定了111份身体活动干预报告,然后在第4阶段对其进行注释。结论:作为HBCP的一部分开发的戒烟注释方法大多可转移到体育活动领域。然而,应用于行为结果变量的代码需要调整。本文可以帮助任何有兴趣建立研究体系的人,以开发用于身体活动或其他行为的自动证据合成方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From smoking cessation to physical activity: Can ontology-based methods for automated evidence synthesis generalise across behaviour change domains?

Background: Developing behaviour change interventions able to tackle major challenges such as non-communicable diseases or climate change requires effective and efficient use of scientific evidence. The Human Behaviour-Change Project (HBCP) aims to improve evidence synthesis in behavioural science by compiling intervention reports and annotating them with an ontology to train information extraction and prediction algorithms. The HBCP used smoking cessation as the first 'proof of concept' domain but intends to extend its methodology to other behaviours. The aims of this paper are to (i) assess the extent to which methods developed for annotating smoking cessation intervention reports were generalisable to a corpus of physical activity evidence, and (ii) describe the steps involved in developing this second HBCP corpus.

Methods: The development of the physical activity corpus involved: (i) reviewing the suitability of smoking cessation codes already used in the HBCP, (ii) defining the selection criteria and scope, (iii) identifying and screening records for inclusion, and (iv) annotating intervention reports using a code set of 200+ entities from the Behaviour Change Intervention Ontology.

Results: Stage 1 highlighted the need to modify the smoking cessation behavioural outcome codes for application to physical activity. One hundred physical activity intervention reports were reviewed, and 11 physical activity experts were consulted to inform the adapted code set. Stage 2 involved narrowing down the scope of the corpus to interventions targeting moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. In stage 3, 111 physical activity intervention reports were identified, which were then annotated in stage 4.

Conclusions: Smoking cessation annotation methods developed as part of the HBCP were mostly transferable to the physical activity domain. However, the codes applied to behavioural outcome variables required adaptations. This paper can help anyone interested in building a body of research to develop automated evidence synthesis methods in physical activity or for other behaviours.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wellcome Open Research
Wellcome Open Research Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: Wellcome Open Research publishes scholarly articles reporting any basic scientific, translational and clinical research that has been funded (or co-funded) by Wellcome. Each publication must have at least one author who has been, or still is, a recipient of a Wellcome grant. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others, is welcome and will be published irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies are all suitable. See the full list of article types here. All articles are published using a fully transparent, author-driven model: the authors are solely responsible for the content of their article. Invited peer review takes place openly after publication, and the authors play a crucial role in ensuring that the article is peer-reviewed by independent experts in a timely manner. Articles that pass peer review will be indexed in PubMed and elsewhere. Wellcome Open Research is an Open Research platform: all articles are published open access; the publishing and peer-review processes are fully transparent; and authors are asked to include detailed descriptions of methods and to provide full and easy access to source data underlying the results to improve reproducibility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信