帕金森氏症患者的手写、触屏灵巧性和运动迟缓:一项特征选择研究。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Andrea Gardoni, Elisabetta Sarasso, Silvia Basaia, Davide Corbetta, Lucia Zenere, Andrea Grassi, Elisa Canu, Veronica Castelnovo, Elisa Sibilla, Massimo Malcangi, Roberta Balestrino, Daniele Emedoli, Maria Antonietta Volontè, Massimo Filippi, Federica Agosta
{"title":"帕金森氏症患者的手写、触屏灵巧性和运动迟缓:一项特征选择研究。","authors":"Andrea Gardoni, Elisabetta Sarasso, Silvia Basaia, Davide Corbetta, Lucia Zenere, Andrea Grassi, Elisa Canu, Veronica Castelnovo, Elisa Sibilla, Massimo Malcangi, Roberta Balestrino, Daniele Emedoli, Maria Antonietta Volontè, Massimo Filippi, Federica Agosta","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-13121-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bradykinesia affects handwriting and smartphone usage in patients with Parkinson's disease (pwPD).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess handwriting, hand dexterity, smartphone usage, and bradykinesia in pwPD and identify features that best describe upper-limb alterations in pwPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty pwPD and 30 age/sex-matched healthy controls were included. We used standard handwriting/dexterity tests: Manual-Ability-Measure-36, Purdue-Pegboard-Test (PPT) and copy of a text on paper. Spatiotemporal handwriting parameters were assessed using tests on a tablet: copy of text and pre-writing tasks. To obtain objective data on movement speed and amplitude on the smartphone, we developed tests involving the most commonly used gestures (tap, swipe, and slide). Bradykinesia during a finger-tapping task was evaluated using electromagnetic sensors. Sequential feature selection models were used to identify the parameters best distinguishing pwPD and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PwPD relative to healthy controls showed reduced manual ability and dexterity. They showed reduced movement amplitude and speed in smartphone tests and signs of micrographia during handwriting tests. Moreover, kinematic parameters correlated with both PPT and Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III. Each feature selection model demonstrated a good accuracy, particularly when including standard handwriting/dexterity tests (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.90), tests on smartphone (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.94) and all the features together (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.97). The best features were self-reported manual abilities, PPT, tap and swipe speed/amplitude on smartphone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that technological assessments can be added to standard evaluations to provide quantitative measures of handwriting, dexterity, and bradykinesia that will be useful to assess PD progression and the effects of interventions in pwPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 6","pages":"389"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Handwriting, touchscreen dexterity and bradykinesia measures in Parkinson's disease: a feature selection study.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Gardoni, Elisabetta Sarasso, Silvia Basaia, Davide Corbetta, Lucia Zenere, Andrea Grassi, Elisa Canu, Veronica Castelnovo, Elisa Sibilla, Massimo Malcangi, Roberta Balestrino, Daniele Emedoli, Maria Antonietta Volontè, Massimo Filippi, Federica Agosta\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00415-025-13121-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Bradykinesia affects handwriting and smartphone usage in patients with Parkinson's disease (pwPD).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess handwriting, hand dexterity, smartphone usage, and bradykinesia in pwPD and identify features that best describe upper-limb alterations in pwPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty pwPD and 30 age/sex-matched healthy controls were included. We used standard handwriting/dexterity tests: Manual-Ability-Measure-36, Purdue-Pegboard-Test (PPT) and copy of a text on paper. Spatiotemporal handwriting parameters were assessed using tests on a tablet: copy of text and pre-writing tasks. To obtain objective data on movement speed and amplitude on the smartphone, we developed tests involving the most commonly used gestures (tap, swipe, and slide). Bradykinesia during a finger-tapping task was evaluated using electromagnetic sensors. Sequential feature selection models were used to identify the parameters best distinguishing pwPD and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PwPD relative to healthy controls showed reduced manual ability and dexterity. They showed reduced movement amplitude and speed in smartphone tests and signs of micrographia during handwriting tests. Moreover, kinematic parameters correlated with both PPT and Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III. Each feature selection model demonstrated a good accuracy, particularly when including standard handwriting/dexterity tests (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.90), tests on smartphone (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.94) and all the features together (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.97). The best features were self-reported manual abilities, PPT, tap and swipe speed/amplitude on smartphone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that technological assessments can be added to standard evaluations to provide quantitative measures of handwriting, dexterity, and bradykinesia that will be useful to assess PD progression and the effects of interventions in pwPD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":\"272 6\",\"pages\":\"389\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13121-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13121-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

运动迟缓影响帕金森病(pwPD)患者的书写和智能手机使用。目的:评估pwPD患者的笔迹、手灵巧度、智能手机使用和运动迟缓,并确定最能描述pwPD患者上肢改变的特征。方法:纳入40例pwPD患者和30例年龄/性别匹配的健康对照。我们使用标准的书写/灵巧性测试:手工能力测试-36,普渡钉板测试(PPT)和在纸上复制文本。使用平板电脑测试评估时空书写参数:文本副本和书写前任务。为了获得智能手机上移动速度和幅度的客观数据,我们开发了涉及最常用手势(点击、滑动和滑动)的测试。使用电磁传感器评估手指敲击任务中的运动迟缓。序列特征选择模型用于识别区分pwPD和健康对照组的最佳参数。结果:与健康对照者相比,PwPD患者的手操作能力和灵巧性下降。他们在智能手机测试中表现出运动幅度和速度的下降,在手写测试中表现出缩微症的迹象。此外,运动学参数与PPT和运动障碍学会统一帕金森病评定量表III相关。每个特征选择模型都显示出良好的准确性,特别是当包括标准手写/灵巧性测试(R2 = 0.90)、智能手机测试(R2 = 0.94)和所有特征一起(R2 = 0.97)时。最好的功能是自我报告的手动能力,PPT,在智能手机上的点击和滑动速度/幅度。结论:本研究表明,技术评估可以添加到标准评估中,以提供手写、灵巧性和运动迟缓的定量测量,这将有助于评估PD的进展和干预措施对pwPD的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Handwriting, touchscreen dexterity and bradykinesia measures in Parkinson's disease: a feature selection study.

Introduction: Bradykinesia affects handwriting and smartphone usage in patients with Parkinson's disease (pwPD).

Objective: To assess handwriting, hand dexterity, smartphone usage, and bradykinesia in pwPD and identify features that best describe upper-limb alterations in pwPD.

Methods: Forty pwPD and 30 age/sex-matched healthy controls were included. We used standard handwriting/dexterity tests: Manual-Ability-Measure-36, Purdue-Pegboard-Test (PPT) and copy of a text on paper. Spatiotemporal handwriting parameters were assessed using tests on a tablet: copy of text and pre-writing tasks. To obtain objective data on movement speed and amplitude on the smartphone, we developed tests involving the most commonly used gestures (tap, swipe, and slide). Bradykinesia during a finger-tapping task was evaluated using electromagnetic sensors. Sequential feature selection models were used to identify the parameters best distinguishing pwPD and healthy controls.

Results: PwPD relative to healthy controls showed reduced manual ability and dexterity. They showed reduced movement amplitude and speed in smartphone tests and signs of micrographia during handwriting tests. Moreover, kinematic parameters correlated with both PPT and Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale III. Each feature selection model demonstrated a good accuracy, particularly when including standard handwriting/dexterity tests (R2 = 0.90), tests on smartphone (R2 = 0.94) and all the features together (R2 = 0.97). The best features were self-reported manual abilities, PPT, tap and swipe speed/amplitude on smartphone.

Conclusions: This study showed that technological assessments can be added to standard evaluations to provide quantitative measures of handwriting, dexterity, and bradykinesia that will be useful to assess PD progression and the effects of interventions in pwPD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信