贝达喹啉、利奈唑胺、氯法齐明“核心”治疗耐多药结核病的有效性。

IJTLD open Pub Date : 2025-05-12 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0515
C Zeng, M A Hernán, L Trevisi, S Sauer, C D Mitnick, C Hewison, M Bastard, P Khan, K J Seung, M L Rich, S Law, M Kikvidze, O Kirakosyan, A Miankou, P Thit, S Mamsa, A Janmohamed, N Melikyan, S Ahmed, D Vargas, A B Binegdie, K Temirova, L Oyewusi, K Philippe, S C Vilbrun, U Khan, H Huerga, M F Franke
{"title":"贝达喹啉、利奈唑胺、氯法齐明“核心”治疗耐多药结核病的有效性。","authors":"C Zeng, M A Hernán, L Trevisi, S Sauer, C D Mitnick, C Hewison, M Bastard, P Khan, K J Seung, M L Rich, S Law, M Kikvidze, O Kirakosyan, A Miankou, P Thit, S Mamsa, A Janmohamed, N Melikyan, S Ahmed, D Vargas, A B Binegdie, K Temirova, L Oyewusi, K Philippe, S C Vilbrun, U Khan, H Huerga, M F Franke","doi":"10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment outcomes may be compromised among individuals with multidrug/rifampicin-resistant TB (MDR/RR-TB) with fluoroquinolone (FQ) resistance. Among people in whom an FQ was unlikely to be effective, we compared the effectiveness of longer individualised regimens comprised of bedaquiline (Bdq) for 5-8 months, linezolid, and clofazimine to those reinforced with at least 1 Group C drug and/or longer Bdq duration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We emulated a target trial to compare the effectiveness of initiating and remaining on the core regimen to a regimen reinforced with 1) Bdq for ≥9 months, 2) Bdq for ≥9 months, and delamanid (Dlm), 3) imipenem (Imp), 4) a second-line injectable, or 5) Bdq for ≥9 months, Dlm and Imp. We used cloning, censoring, and inverse-probability weighting to estimate the probabilities of successful treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adjusted probabilities of successful treatment ranged from 0.75 (95% CI 0.61-0.89) to 0.84 (95% CI 0.76-0.91). Ratios of treatment success ranged from 1.01 for regimens reinforced with Bdq ≥9 months (95% CI 0.79-1.28) and Bdq ≥9 months plus Dlm (95% CI 0.81-1.31) to 1.11 for regimens reinforced with an injectable (95% CI 0.92-1.39) and Bdq ≥9 months, Dlm and Imp (95% CI 0.90-1.41).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Some reinforced regimens had modestly higher treatment success rates, but estimates were imprecise. Additional studies of strategies for maximising treatment success among individuals with FQ resistance are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":519984,"journal":{"name":"IJTLD open","volume":"2 5","pages":"269-275"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12068452/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of a bedaquiline, linezolid, clofazimine 'core' for multidrug-resistant TB.\",\"authors\":\"C Zeng, M A Hernán, L Trevisi, S Sauer, C D Mitnick, C Hewison, M Bastard, P Khan, K J Seung, M L Rich, S Law, M Kikvidze, O Kirakosyan, A Miankou, P Thit, S Mamsa, A Janmohamed, N Melikyan, S Ahmed, D Vargas, A B Binegdie, K Temirova, L Oyewusi, K Philippe, S C Vilbrun, U Khan, H Huerga, M F Franke\",\"doi\":\"10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Treatment outcomes may be compromised among individuals with multidrug/rifampicin-resistant TB (MDR/RR-TB) with fluoroquinolone (FQ) resistance. Among people in whom an FQ was unlikely to be effective, we compared the effectiveness of longer individualised regimens comprised of bedaquiline (Bdq) for 5-8 months, linezolid, and clofazimine to those reinforced with at least 1 Group C drug and/or longer Bdq duration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We emulated a target trial to compare the effectiveness of initiating and remaining on the core regimen to a regimen reinforced with 1) Bdq for ≥9 months, 2) Bdq for ≥9 months, and delamanid (Dlm), 3) imipenem (Imp), 4) a second-line injectable, or 5) Bdq for ≥9 months, Dlm and Imp. We used cloning, censoring, and inverse-probability weighting to estimate the probabilities of successful treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adjusted probabilities of successful treatment ranged from 0.75 (95% CI 0.61-0.89) to 0.84 (95% CI 0.76-0.91). Ratios of treatment success ranged from 1.01 for regimens reinforced with Bdq ≥9 months (95% CI 0.79-1.28) and Bdq ≥9 months plus Dlm (95% CI 0.81-1.31) to 1.11 for regimens reinforced with an injectable (95% CI 0.92-1.39) and Bdq ≥9 months, Dlm and Imp (95% CI 0.90-1.41).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Some reinforced regimens had modestly higher treatment success rates, but estimates were imprecise. Additional studies of strategies for maximising treatment success among individuals with FQ resistance are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJTLD open\",\"volume\":\"2 5\",\"pages\":\"269-275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12068452/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJTLD open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0515\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJTLD open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.24.0515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多药/利福平耐药结核病(MDR/RR-TB)伴氟喹诺酮(FQ)耐药患者的治疗结果可能会受到影响。在FQ不太可能有效的人群中,我们比较了由贝达喹啉(Bdq) 5-8个月、利奈唑胺和氯法齐明组成的较长个性化方案与至少1种C组药物和/或较长Bdq持续时间的强化方案的有效性。方法:我们模拟了一项目标试验,比较开始和保持核心方案的有效性与1)Bdq≥9个月,2)Bdq≥9个月,以及delamanid (Dlm), 3)亚胺培南(Imp), 4)二线注射剂,或5)Bdq≥9个月,Dlm和Imp的方案。我们使用克隆,审查和逆概率加权来估计成功治疗的概率。结果:治疗成功的调整概率范围为0.75 (95% CI 0.61-0.89)至0.84 (95% CI 0.76-0.91)。治疗成功率的比值范围从Bdq≥9个月(95% CI 0.79-1.28)和Bdq≥9个月加Dlm (95% CI 0.81-1.31)强化方案的1.01到注射强化方案的1.11 (95% CI 0.92-1.39)和Bdq≥9个月、Dlm和Imp (95% CI 0.90-1.41)。结论:一些强化方案的治疗成功率略高,但估计不准确。需要进一步研究在FQ耐药个体中使治疗成功率最大化的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of a bedaquiline, linezolid, clofazimine 'core' for multidrug-resistant TB.

Background: Treatment outcomes may be compromised among individuals with multidrug/rifampicin-resistant TB (MDR/RR-TB) with fluoroquinolone (FQ) resistance. Among people in whom an FQ was unlikely to be effective, we compared the effectiveness of longer individualised regimens comprised of bedaquiline (Bdq) for 5-8 months, linezolid, and clofazimine to those reinforced with at least 1 Group C drug and/or longer Bdq duration.

Methods: We emulated a target trial to compare the effectiveness of initiating and remaining on the core regimen to a regimen reinforced with 1) Bdq for ≥9 months, 2) Bdq for ≥9 months, and delamanid (Dlm), 3) imipenem (Imp), 4) a second-line injectable, or 5) Bdq for ≥9 months, Dlm and Imp. We used cloning, censoring, and inverse-probability weighting to estimate the probabilities of successful treatment.

Results: Adjusted probabilities of successful treatment ranged from 0.75 (95% CI 0.61-0.89) to 0.84 (95% CI 0.76-0.91). Ratios of treatment success ranged from 1.01 for regimens reinforced with Bdq ≥9 months (95% CI 0.79-1.28) and Bdq ≥9 months plus Dlm (95% CI 0.81-1.31) to 1.11 for regimens reinforced with an injectable (95% CI 0.92-1.39) and Bdq ≥9 months, Dlm and Imp (95% CI 0.90-1.41).

Conclusions: Some reinforced regimens had modestly higher treatment success rates, but estimates were imprecise. Additional studies of strategies for maximising treatment success among individuals with FQ resistance are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信