James Baker, Aaron Balloch, Peter Peeling, Machar Reid, Ash Hall, Helen Bayne
{"title":"自定义训练人体姿态估计模型的评估,用于撑杆跳成绩的运动学分析。","authors":"James Baker, Aaron Balloch, Peter Peeling, Machar Reid, Ash Hall, Helen Bayne","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2490418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Kinematic outputs from a custom human pose estimation (HPE) system and a marker-based system (MB) were compared. Six trained/highly trained pole vaulters (two males and four females) participated in a single testing session of 2-8 vaults. HPE utilized footage from three 50 hz cameras and a pole vault-trained model (based on the ASPset21j dataset) for tracking. Vaults were temporally normalized from take-off to peak pelvis height. Centre of mass (COM) and joint centre (JC) locations were compared between systems using Bland-Altman analysis, Mean Absolute Error (MAE) in all three planes, linear regression (R<sup>2</sup>), and average Euclidean distances. Peak COM heights ranged from 2.98 to 3.94 m across participants. COM position demonstrated an adequate level of agreement in pole vault context (Bland-Altman bias: 9-63 mm, MAE: 37-71 mm, R<sup>2</sup> : .95-1.00, average Euclidean distance: 99 ± 41 mm). Between-system comparisons varied across different JCs (Bland-Altman bias: 3-93 mm, MAE: 30-99 mm, R<sup>2</sup>: 0.40-0.99, Euclidean distance: 85-127 mm). Importantly, the vertical COM MAE of 41 mm is less than the minimum increase in bar height typically applied in pole vault competition (50 mm), indicating that the HPE measure of COM height is sufficiently accurate for evaluating vault performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a custom trained human pose estimation model for kinematic analysis of pole vault performance.\",\"authors\":\"James Baker, Aaron Balloch, Peter Peeling, Machar Reid, Ash Hall, Helen Bayne\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02640414.2025.2490418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Kinematic outputs from a custom human pose estimation (HPE) system and a marker-based system (MB) were compared. Six trained/highly trained pole vaulters (two males and four females) participated in a single testing session of 2-8 vaults. HPE utilized footage from three 50 hz cameras and a pole vault-trained model (based on the ASPset21j dataset) for tracking. Vaults were temporally normalized from take-off to peak pelvis height. Centre of mass (COM) and joint centre (JC) locations were compared between systems using Bland-Altman analysis, Mean Absolute Error (MAE) in all three planes, linear regression (R<sup>2</sup>), and average Euclidean distances. Peak COM heights ranged from 2.98 to 3.94 m across participants. COM position demonstrated an adequate level of agreement in pole vault context (Bland-Altman bias: 9-63 mm, MAE: 37-71 mm, R<sup>2</sup> : .95-1.00, average Euclidean distance: 99 ± 41 mm). Between-system comparisons varied across different JCs (Bland-Altman bias: 3-93 mm, MAE: 30-99 mm, R<sup>2</sup>: 0.40-0.99, Euclidean distance: 85-127 mm). Importantly, the vertical COM MAE of 41 mm is less than the minimum increase in bar height typically applied in pole vault competition (50 mm), indicating that the HPE measure of COM height is sufficiently accurate for evaluating vault performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2490418\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2490418","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
比较了自定义人体姿态估计(HPE)系统和基于标记的系统(MB)的运动输出。6名训练有素/训练有素的撑杆跳运动员(2名男性和4名女性)参加了2-8次的单次测试。HPE利用三个50赫兹摄像机的镜头和一个撑杆跳训练模型(基于ASPset21j数据集)进行跟踪。跳马从起飞到骨盆最高高度暂时归一化。采用Bland-Altman分析、三个平面的平均绝对误差(MAE)、线性回归(R2)和平均欧氏距离对系统的质心(COM)和关节中心(JC)位置进行比较。参与者的COM峰值高度在2.98到3.94米之间。COM位置在撑杆跳情境中表现出足够的一致性(Bland-Altman偏倚:9-63 mm, MAE: 37-71 mm, R2: 0.95 -1.00,平均欧氏距离:99±41 mm)。不同JCs的系统间比较存在差异(Bland-Altman偏倚:3-93 mm, MAE: 30-99 mm, R2: 0.40-0.99,欧几里得距离:85-127 mm)。重要的是,41毫米的垂直COM MAE小于撑杆跳比赛中通常使用的杆高最小增量(50毫米),这表明HPE测量的COM高度对于评估跳马成绩是足够准确的。
Evaluation of a custom trained human pose estimation model for kinematic analysis of pole vault performance.
Kinematic outputs from a custom human pose estimation (HPE) system and a marker-based system (MB) were compared. Six trained/highly trained pole vaulters (two males and four females) participated in a single testing session of 2-8 vaults. HPE utilized footage from three 50 hz cameras and a pole vault-trained model (based on the ASPset21j dataset) for tracking. Vaults were temporally normalized from take-off to peak pelvis height. Centre of mass (COM) and joint centre (JC) locations were compared between systems using Bland-Altman analysis, Mean Absolute Error (MAE) in all three planes, linear regression (R2), and average Euclidean distances. Peak COM heights ranged from 2.98 to 3.94 m across participants. COM position demonstrated an adequate level of agreement in pole vault context (Bland-Altman bias: 9-63 mm, MAE: 37-71 mm, R2 : .95-1.00, average Euclidean distance: 99 ± 41 mm). Between-system comparisons varied across different JCs (Bland-Altman bias: 3-93 mm, MAE: 30-99 mm, R2: 0.40-0.99, Euclidean distance: 85-127 mm). Importantly, the vertical COM MAE of 41 mm is less than the minimum increase in bar height typically applied in pole vault competition (50 mm), indicating that the HPE measure of COM height is sufficiently accurate for evaluating vault performance.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives.
The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.