多重睡眠潜伏期测试的睡眠潜伏期预测因子:社区样本的随机森林调查。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jesse D Cook, Filipe Barata, David T Plante, Steve Woodward, Jamie M Zeitzer, Renske Lok
{"title":"多重睡眠潜伏期测试的睡眠潜伏期预测因子:社区样本的随机森林调查。","authors":"Jesse D Cook, Filipe Barata, David T Plante, Steve Woodward, Jamie M Zeitzer, Renske Lok","doi":"10.1111/jsr.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to advance the understanding of factors that predict mean sleep latency (MSL) on the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) by applying machine learning methodology on a high-dimensional dataset from a large community sample. A cross-sectional analytic dataset of first visit clinical-protocol MSLTs (without shift workers) was developed from the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort Study, a community-based longitudinal study of middle-aged to older adults in Wisconsin, USA. Fifty predictors captured demographics, medical and psychiatric health, sleep (diary; polysomnography [PSG]) and circadian characteristics. The random forest (RF) algorithm identified the 10 most important predictors, which underwent subsequent regression analyses. Primary analyses focused on MSLT MSL, whereas secondary analyses centred on nap-specific sleep latencies. Post hoc analyses further explored the relationship between circadian preference and MSLT MSL. The primary sample (n = 301) of middle-aged adults (mean age = 57.5 ± 7.71 years) was predominantly non-Hispanic White (97%) and nearly equal across sexes (percentage female = 51.8%). RF model showed low explanatory value for MSLT MSL (R<sup>2</sup> = 12%) with PSG sleep onset latency, circadian preference, daily caffeine use and Epworth Sleepiness Scale emerging as the most important predictors of MSLT MSL in the dataset. Top predictors varied across nap-specific sleep latency. Morning preference displayed significantly longer MSLT MSL, relative to neither and evening preferences. The low explanatory value observed in our high-dimensional RF models seemingly reflects the complexity and variability of the MSLT. Additionally, our results underscore the importance and challenge of accounting for circadian characteristics when utilising the MSLT.</p>","PeriodicalId":17057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sleep Research","volume":" ","pages":"e70073"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of Sleep Latency From the Multiple Sleep Latency Test: A Random Forest Investigation in a Community Sample.\",\"authors\":\"Jesse D Cook, Filipe Barata, David T Plante, Steve Woodward, Jamie M Zeitzer, Renske Lok\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jsr.70073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to advance the understanding of factors that predict mean sleep latency (MSL) on the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) by applying machine learning methodology on a high-dimensional dataset from a large community sample. A cross-sectional analytic dataset of first visit clinical-protocol MSLTs (without shift workers) was developed from the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort Study, a community-based longitudinal study of middle-aged to older adults in Wisconsin, USA. Fifty predictors captured demographics, medical and psychiatric health, sleep (diary; polysomnography [PSG]) and circadian characteristics. The random forest (RF) algorithm identified the 10 most important predictors, which underwent subsequent regression analyses. Primary analyses focused on MSLT MSL, whereas secondary analyses centred on nap-specific sleep latencies. Post hoc analyses further explored the relationship between circadian preference and MSLT MSL. The primary sample (n = 301) of middle-aged adults (mean age = 57.5 ± 7.71 years) was predominantly non-Hispanic White (97%) and nearly equal across sexes (percentage female = 51.8%). RF model showed low explanatory value for MSLT MSL (R<sup>2</sup> = 12%) with PSG sleep onset latency, circadian preference, daily caffeine use and Epworth Sleepiness Scale emerging as the most important predictors of MSLT MSL in the dataset. Top predictors varied across nap-specific sleep latency. Morning preference displayed significantly longer MSLT MSL, relative to neither and evening preferences. The low explanatory value observed in our high-dimensional RF models seemingly reflects the complexity and variability of the MSLT. Additionally, our results underscore the importance and challenge of accounting for circadian characteristics when utilising the MSLT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sleep Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70073\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sleep Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.70073\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sleep Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.70073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在通过对来自大型社区样本的高维数据集应用机器学习方法,促进对多次睡眠潜伏期测试(MSLT)中预测平均睡眠潜伏期(MSL)的因素的理解。首次就诊临床方案mslt(没有轮班工人)的横断面分析数据集来自威斯康星州睡眠队列研究,这是一项以社区为基础的美国威斯康星州中年至老年人的纵向研究。50个预测指标包括人口统计、医疗和精神健康、睡眠(日记;多导睡眠图[PSG])和昼夜节律特征。随机森林(RF)算法确定了10个最重要的预测因子,并对其进行了随后的回归分析。主要分析集中在MSLT,而次要分析集中在午睡特异性睡眠潜伏期。事后分析进一步探讨了昼夜节律偏好与MSLT的关系。主要样本(n = 301)为中年成年人(平均年龄= 57.5±7.71岁),主要是非西班牙裔白人(97%),性别几乎相等(女性百分比= 51.8%)。RF模型对MSLT MSL的解释价值较低(R2 = 12%), PSG睡眠发作潜伏期、昼夜节律偏好、每日咖啡因使用和Epworth嗜睡量表在数据集中成为MSLT MSL最重要的预测因子。最主要的预测因子因午睡特异性睡眠潜伏期而异。相对于“不”偏好和“晚”偏好,早晨偏好表现出更长的MSLT。在我们的高维射频模型中观察到的低解释值似乎反映了MSLT的复杂性和变异性。此外,我们的结果强调了在使用MSLT时考虑昼夜节律特征的重要性和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors of Sleep Latency From the Multiple Sleep Latency Test: A Random Forest Investigation in a Community Sample.

This study aimed to advance the understanding of factors that predict mean sleep latency (MSL) on the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) by applying machine learning methodology on a high-dimensional dataset from a large community sample. A cross-sectional analytic dataset of first visit clinical-protocol MSLTs (without shift workers) was developed from the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort Study, a community-based longitudinal study of middle-aged to older adults in Wisconsin, USA. Fifty predictors captured demographics, medical and psychiatric health, sleep (diary; polysomnography [PSG]) and circadian characteristics. The random forest (RF) algorithm identified the 10 most important predictors, which underwent subsequent regression analyses. Primary analyses focused on MSLT MSL, whereas secondary analyses centred on nap-specific sleep latencies. Post hoc analyses further explored the relationship between circadian preference and MSLT MSL. The primary sample (n = 301) of middle-aged adults (mean age = 57.5 ± 7.71 years) was predominantly non-Hispanic White (97%) and nearly equal across sexes (percentage female = 51.8%). RF model showed low explanatory value for MSLT MSL (R2 = 12%) with PSG sleep onset latency, circadian preference, daily caffeine use and Epworth Sleepiness Scale emerging as the most important predictors of MSLT MSL in the dataset. Top predictors varied across nap-specific sleep latency. Morning preference displayed significantly longer MSLT MSL, relative to neither and evening preferences. The low explanatory value observed in our high-dimensional RF models seemingly reflects the complexity and variability of the MSLT. Additionally, our results underscore the importance and challenge of accounting for circadian characteristics when utilising the MSLT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sleep Research
Journal of Sleep Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sleep Research is dedicated to basic and clinical sleep research. The Journal publishes original research papers and invited reviews in all areas of sleep research (including biological rhythms). The Journal aims to promote the exchange of ideas between basic and clinical sleep researchers coming from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines. The Journal will achieve this by publishing papers which use multidisciplinary and novel approaches to answer important questions about sleep, as well as its disorders and the treatment thereof.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信