Marcela Feltrin de Barros, Karolinne Maia Rocha, George O Waring, Marcony R Santhiago, Rupal H Trivedi
{"title":"紫光滤光衍射扩展焦深人工晶状体诱发散光的视觉影响。","authors":"Marcela Feltrin de Barros, Karolinne Maia Rocha, George O Waring, Marcony R Santhiago, Rupal H Trivedi","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20250317-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate tolerance to simulated astigmatism on distance visual acuity in pseudophakic eyes implanted with an extended depth of focus (EDOF) diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) with violet light filter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent cataract surgery with violet light-filtering diffractive EDOF IOL implantation. Cylinder defocus was induced with plus cylinder lenses from +0.50 to +2.00 diopters (D) in 0.50-D steps for each astigmatic orientation (against-the-rule [ATR], oblique, and with-the-rule [WTR]). The monocular distance visual acuity was measured after induced astigmatism was added to the patient's corrected distance manifest refraction. The magnitude of astigmatic tolerance was assessed by taking the difference between distance visual acuity at each defocus relative to corrected distance visual acuity without defocus. Quality of vision was evaluated using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients maintained 20/40 or better distance visual acuity with up to 1.00 D WTR astigmatism and 0.50 D ATR and oblique astigmatism. The median astigmatic defocus to maintain distance visual acuity within one-line reduction was 1.00 D with WTR and 0.50 D with ATR and oblique astigmatism. Within a two-line reduction, it was 1.50 D for WTR and 1.00 D for oblique and ATR. All patients reported excellent outcomes on the VFQ-25 questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The diffractive EDOF IOL with violet light filter demonstrated satisfactory distance vision tolerance to induced astigmatism. WTR astigmatism was better tolerated for distance vision than oblique and ATR astigmatism. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(5):e421-e426.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 5","pages":"e421-e426"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Visual Impact of Induced Astigmatism of a Violet Light-Filtering Diffractive Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens.\",\"authors\":\"Marcela Feltrin de Barros, Karolinne Maia Rocha, George O Waring, Marcony R Santhiago, Rupal H Trivedi\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/1081597X-20250317-04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate tolerance to simulated astigmatism on distance visual acuity in pseudophakic eyes implanted with an extended depth of focus (EDOF) diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) with violet light filter.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent cataract surgery with violet light-filtering diffractive EDOF IOL implantation. Cylinder defocus was induced with plus cylinder lenses from +0.50 to +2.00 diopters (D) in 0.50-D steps for each astigmatic orientation (against-the-rule [ATR], oblique, and with-the-rule [WTR]). The monocular distance visual acuity was measured after induced astigmatism was added to the patient's corrected distance manifest refraction. The magnitude of astigmatic tolerance was assessed by taking the difference between distance visual acuity at each defocus relative to corrected distance visual acuity without defocus. Quality of vision was evaluated using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients maintained 20/40 or better distance visual acuity with up to 1.00 D WTR astigmatism and 0.50 D ATR and oblique astigmatism. The median astigmatic defocus to maintain distance visual acuity within one-line reduction was 1.00 D with WTR and 0.50 D with ATR and oblique astigmatism. Within a two-line reduction, it was 1.50 D for WTR and 1.00 D for oblique and ATR. All patients reported excellent outcomes on the VFQ-25 questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The diffractive EDOF IOL with violet light filter demonstrated satisfactory distance vision tolerance to induced astigmatism. WTR astigmatism was better tolerated for distance vision than oblique and ATR astigmatism. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(5):e421-e426.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\"41 5\",\"pages\":\"e421-e426\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250317-04\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250317-04","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Visual Impact of Induced Astigmatism of a Violet Light-Filtering Diffractive Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens.
Purpose: To evaluate tolerance to simulated astigmatism on distance visual acuity in pseudophakic eyes implanted with an extended depth of focus (EDOF) diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) with violet light filter.
Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent cataract surgery with violet light-filtering diffractive EDOF IOL implantation. Cylinder defocus was induced with plus cylinder lenses from +0.50 to +2.00 diopters (D) in 0.50-D steps for each astigmatic orientation (against-the-rule [ATR], oblique, and with-the-rule [WTR]). The monocular distance visual acuity was measured after induced astigmatism was added to the patient's corrected distance manifest refraction. The magnitude of astigmatic tolerance was assessed by taking the difference between distance visual acuity at each defocus relative to corrected distance visual acuity without defocus. Quality of vision was evaluated using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25).
Results: Most patients maintained 20/40 or better distance visual acuity with up to 1.00 D WTR astigmatism and 0.50 D ATR and oblique astigmatism. The median astigmatic defocus to maintain distance visual acuity within one-line reduction was 1.00 D with WTR and 0.50 D with ATR and oblique astigmatism. Within a two-line reduction, it was 1.50 D for WTR and 1.00 D for oblique and ATR. All patients reported excellent outcomes on the VFQ-25 questionnaire.
Conclusions: The diffractive EDOF IOL with violet light filter demonstrated satisfactory distance vision tolerance to induced astigmatism. WTR astigmatism was better tolerated for distance vision than oblique and ATR astigmatism. [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(5):e421-e426.].
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as:
• Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics”
• Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles
• Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content
• Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.