皮肤化学烧伤:水冲洗急救改善短期结果。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Hayley Chai, Lisa Martin, Rachel Kornhaber, Leila Cuttle, Mark Fear, Fiona Wood
{"title":"皮肤化学烧伤:水冲洗急救改善短期结果。","authors":"Hayley Chai, Lisa Martin, Rachel Kornhaber, Leila Cuttle, Mark Fear, Fiona Wood","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>First aid recommendations for chemical burns include copious water irrigation for 30 minutes to 2 hours after removal of the substance from skin. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to assess the efficacy of water irrigation on short-term outcomes for chemical burn injuries. Data from the Australian and New Zealand Burn registry (2009-2020) were analysed to categorize the application of running water for first aid for presence, timing of application post-injury and duration. The timing of first aid application was classified into whether the application was prehospital or in-hospital. Multivariate regression analyses then evaluated how water irrigation affected hospital stay, ICU admission, and the necessity for acute surgery for wound closure. Among 1,549 chemical burn patients, for those who received in-hospital first aid their stay was reduced by about 18% compared to those who did not. Patients receiving pre-hospital or in-hospital first aid had 37% and 31% lower odds, respectively, of needing acute care surgery for wound closure compared to those who did not. There was no evidence that first aid provision influenced the need for intensive care admission. Water irrigation is associated with shorter hospital stays and reduced acute care surgery for wound closure following chemical burns, without impacting intensive care admission rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cutaneous chemical burns: Water irrigation first aid improves short term outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Hayley Chai, Lisa Martin, Rachel Kornhaber, Leila Cuttle, Mark Fear, Fiona Wood\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/iraf079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>First aid recommendations for chemical burns include copious water irrigation for 30 minutes to 2 hours after removal of the substance from skin. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to assess the efficacy of water irrigation on short-term outcomes for chemical burn injuries. Data from the Australian and New Zealand Burn registry (2009-2020) were analysed to categorize the application of running water for first aid for presence, timing of application post-injury and duration. The timing of first aid application was classified into whether the application was prehospital or in-hospital. Multivariate regression analyses then evaluated how water irrigation affected hospital stay, ICU admission, and the necessity for acute surgery for wound closure. Among 1,549 chemical burn patients, for those who received in-hospital first aid their stay was reduced by about 18% compared to those who did not. Patients receiving pre-hospital or in-hospital first aid had 37% and 31% lower odds, respectively, of needing acute care surgery for wound closure compared to those who did not. There was no evidence that first aid provision influenced the need for intensive care admission. Water irrigation is associated with shorter hospital stays and reduced acute care surgery for wound closure following chemical burns, without impacting intensive care admission rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf079\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

化学烧伤的急救建议包括在清除皮肤上的物质后,用大量的水冲洗30分钟至2小时。本回顾性分析的目的是评估水灌溉对化学烧伤短期预后的影响。对澳大利亚和新西兰烧伤登记处(2009-2020年)的数据进行了分析,以分类自来水在急救中的应用情况、伤后应用时间和持续时间。急救时间分为院前急救和院内急救。多变量回归分析评估了灌溉如何影响住院时间、ICU住院时间和紧急手术缝合伤口的必要性。在1,549名化学烧伤患者中,接受了住院急救的患者的住院时间比没有接受急救的患者缩短了约18%。与未接受院前或院内急救的患者相比,接受院前或院内急救的患者需要紧急护理手术缝合伤口的几率分别降低了37%和31%。没有证据表明急救措施影响重症监护入院的需要。水灌溉与缩短住院时间和减少化学烧伤后伤口愈合的急性护理手术有关,而不影响重症监护住院率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cutaneous chemical burns: Water irrigation first aid improves short term outcomes.

First aid recommendations for chemical burns include copious water irrigation for 30 minutes to 2 hours after removal of the substance from skin. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to assess the efficacy of water irrigation on short-term outcomes for chemical burn injuries. Data from the Australian and New Zealand Burn registry (2009-2020) were analysed to categorize the application of running water for first aid for presence, timing of application post-injury and duration. The timing of first aid application was classified into whether the application was prehospital or in-hospital. Multivariate regression analyses then evaluated how water irrigation affected hospital stay, ICU admission, and the necessity for acute surgery for wound closure. Among 1,549 chemical burn patients, for those who received in-hospital first aid their stay was reduced by about 18% compared to those who did not. Patients receiving pre-hospital or in-hospital first aid had 37% and 31% lower odds, respectively, of needing acute care surgery for wound closure compared to those who did not. There was no evidence that first aid provision influenced the need for intensive care admission. Water irrigation is associated with shorter hospital stays and reduced acute care surgery for wound closure following chemical burns, without impacting intensive care admission rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信