杂交黑麦青贮产量及其替代大麦青贮对生长肥育阉牛采食量、生长性能和胴体品质的影响。

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Translational Animal Science Pub Date : 2025-04-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/tas/txaf048
Fuquan Zhang, Rebecca S Brattain, Herman Wehrle, Vern Baron, Gabriel O Ribeiro, Gregory B Penner
{"title":"杂交黑麦青贮产量及其替代大麦青贮对生长肥育阉牛采食量、生长性能和胴体品质的影响。","authors":"Fuquan Zhang, Rebecca S Brattain, Herman Wehrle, Vern Baron, Gabriel O Ribeiro, Gregory B Penner","doi":"10.1093/tas/txaf048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared the yield of barley and hybrid rye when harvested for silage, and evaluated the effects of replacing barley silage (BARS) with hybrid rye silage (HRS) on dry matter intake (DMI), growth, and carcass characteristics of feedlot steers. The whole-plant hybrid rye (late milk) and barley (soft dough) were each harvested from 3 replicate 7.85-ha plots in 2022 and 2023 and ensiled (n = 3/treatment/yr). In each year, 192 steers were allocated to 1 of 16 pens in a completely randomized block design for growing (4 pens/treatment/yr) and finishing (5 or 6 pens/treatment/yr) phases. Treatments during the growing phase (84 d) included a control diet (GCON) that contained 60% BARS, and in the remaining treatments HRS replaced 33 (GLOW), 67 (GMED), or 100% (GHIGH) of the BARS (DM basis). Steers were then re-randomized and allocated to 1 of 16 pens for the finishing phase with diets that contained (DM basis) 10% BARS (FCON) or diets where HRS replaced 50% (FMED) or 100% (FHIGH) of the BARS. Steers were fed for 112 d. Forage DM yield did not differ between whole plant hybrid rye and barley (3.96 vs. 3.70 mT/ha). During the growing phase, increasing the HRS inclusion at the expense of BARS decreased DMI (quadratic, <i>P </i>= 0.02), average daily gain (ADG; quadratic, <i>P</i> < 0.01), and final BW (quadratic, <i>P</i> = 0.02) with the magnitude of the response increasing with increasing HRS inclusion. In addition, the gain:feed (G:F) ratio linearly decreased (<i>P </i>< 0.01) with increasing HRS inclusion. During finishing, DMI tended to linearly decrease (<i>P </i>= 0.06), ADG decreased and then increased (quadratic, <i>P </i>= 0.04) with the lowest ADG observed for FMED, while G:F was unaffected. Carcass weight for steers fed FMED and FHIGH did not differ but were lighter (quadratic, <i>P</i> = 0.02) than FCON, and dressing percentage decreased linearly from 58.81 to 58.34% (<i>P</i> = 0.03) as HRS inclusion increased. Carcass yield grade and marbling were unaffected. Increasing HRS inclusion at the expense of BARS linearly decreased the proportion of steers with minor (<i>P </i>= 0.02) and severe (<i>P </i>= 0.04) liver abscesses. In conclusion, while forage yield may not differ between hybrid rye and barley, increasing the inclusion rate of HRS in diets for growing steers reduced DMI and ADG. During finishing, increasing the inclusion of HRS may decrease DMI and resulted in lighter hot carcass weight without affecting carcass yield grade or marbling.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":"9 ","pages":"txaf048"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12057561/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Yield of hybrid rye silage and its use as a replacement for barley silage on feed intake, growth performance, and carcass quality of growing and finishing steers.\",\"authors\":\"Fuquan Zhang, Rebecca S Brattain, Herman Wehrle, Vern Baron, Gabriel O Ribeiro, Gregory B Penner\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tas/txaf048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study compared the yield of barley and hybrid rye when harvested for silage, and evaluated the effects of replacing barley silage (BARS) with hybrid rye silage (HRS) on dry matter intake (DMI), growth, and carcass characteristics of feedlot steers. The whole-plant hybrid rye (late milk) and barley (soft dough) were each harvested from 3 replicate 7.85-ha plots in 2022 and 2023 and ensiled (n = 3/treatment/yr). In each year, 192 steers were allocated to 1 of 16 pens in a completely randomized block design for growing (4 pens/treatment/yr) and finishing (5 or 6 pens/treatment/yr) phases. Treatments during the growing phase (84 d) included a control diet (GCON) that contained 60% BARS, and in the remaining treatments HRS replaced 33 (GLOW), 67 (GMED), or 100% (GHIGH) of the BARS (DM basis). Steers were then re-randomized and allocated to 1 of 16 pens for the finishing phase with diets that contained (DM basis) 10% BARS (FCON) or diets where HRS replaced 50% (FMED) or 100% (FHIGH) of the BARS. Steers were fed for 112 d. Forage DM yield did not differ between whole plant hybrid rye and barley (3.96 vs. 3.70 mT/ha). During the growing phase, increasing the HRS inclusion at the expense of BARS decreased DMI (quadratic, <i>P </i>= 0.02), average daily gain (ADG; quadratic, <i>P</i> < 0.01), and final BW (quadratic, <i>P</i> = 0.02) with the magnitude of the response increasing with increasing HRS inclusion. In addition, the gain:feed (G:F) ratio linearly decreased (<i>P </i>< 0.01) with increasing HRS inclusion. During finishing, DMI tended to linearly decrease (<i>P </i>= 0.06), ADG decreased and then increased (quadratic, <i>P </i>= 0.04) with the lowest ADG observed for FMED, while G:F was unaffected. Carcass weight for steers fed FMED and FHIGH did not differ but were lighter (quadratic, <i>P</i> = 0.02) than FCON, and dressing percentage decreased linearly from 58.81 to 58.34% (<i>P</i> = 0.03) as HRS inclusion increased. Carcass yield grade and marbling were unaffected. Increasing HRS inclusion at the expense of BARS linearly decreased the proportion of steers with minor (<i>P </i>= 0.02) and severe (<i>P </i>= 0.04) liver abscesses. In conclusion, while forage yield may not differ between hybrid rye and barley, increasing the inclusion rate of HRS in diets for growing steers reduced DMI and ADG. During finishing, increasing the inclusion of HRS may decrease DMI and resulted in lighter hot carcass weight without affecting carcass yield grade or marbling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"txaf048\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12057561/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaf048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaf048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究比较了青贮收获大麦和杂交黑麦的产量,评价了用杂交黑麦青贮替代大麦青贮对饲用阉牛干物质采食量、生长和胴体特性的影响。全株杂交黑麦(晚乳)和大麦(软面团)分别于2022年和2023年在3个7.85 ha的重复地块上收获,并青贮(n = 3个/处理/年)。每年,采用完全随机区组设计,将192头阉牛分配到16个栏中的1个栏中,分为生长期(4个栏/处理/年)和育肥期(5或6个栏/处理/年)。在生长阶段(84 d),对照组饲粮(GCON)中含有60%的BARS,其余处理中HRS替代33% (GLOW)、67% (GMED)或100% (GHIGH)的BARS (DM基础)。然后将阉牛重新随机分配到育肥期16个栏中的1个栏中,饲粮中含有(DM基础)10%的BARS (FCON)或HRS替代50% (FMED)或100% (FHIGH) BARS的饲粮。饲喂112 d。全株杂交黑麦和大麦的饲用DM产量无显著差异(3.96 mT/ha vs 3.70 mT/ha)。在生长期,以bar为代价增加HRS含量降低了DMI(二次曲线,P = 0.02)、平均日增重(ADG);二次型,P P = 0.02),随HRS纳入量的增加,响应幅度增大。增重与料重比(G:F)呈线性降低(P = 0.06),平均日增重先降低后升高(P = 0.04),其中FMED组平均日增重最低,而G:F不受影响。饲喂FMED和FHIGH的肉牛胴体重无显著差异,但较FCON轻(二次曲线,P = 0.02),屠宰率随HRS添加量的增加呈线性下降(P = 0.03),从58.81下降至58.34%。胴体产量等级和大理石花纹未受影响。以BARS为代价增加HRS纳入,轻度(P = 0.02)和重度(P = 0.04)肝脓肿的比例线性降低。综上所述,杂种黑麦和大麦的产草量可能没有差异,但饲粮中HRS添加率的提高降低了生长阉牛的DMI和ADG。在肥育期间,增加HRS添加量可以降低DMI,降低热胴体重,但不影响胴体成品率和大理石纹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Yield of hybrid rye silage and its use as a replacement for barley silage on feed intake, growth performance, and carcass quality of growing and finishing steers.

This study compared the yield of barley and hybrid rye when harvested for silage, and evaluated the effects of replacing barley silage (BARS) with hybrid rye silage (HRS) on dry matter intake (DMI), growth, and carcass characteristics of feedlot steers. The whole-plant hybrid rye (late milk) and barley (soft dough) were each harvested from 3 replicate 7.85-ha plots in 2022 and 2023 and ensiled (n = 3/treatment/yr). In each year, 192 steers were allocated to 1 of 16 pens in a completely randomized block design for growing (4 pens/treatment/yr) and finishing (5 or 6 pens/treatment/yr) phases. Treatments during the growing phase (84 d) included a control diet (GCON) that contained 60% BARS, and in the remaining treatments HRS replaced 33 (GLOW), 67 (GMED), or 100% (GHIGH) of the BARS (DM basis). Steers were then re-randomized and allocated to 1 of 16 pens for the finishing phase with diets that contained (DM basis) 10% BARS (FCON) or diets where HRS replaced 50% (FMED) or 100% (FHIGH) of the BARS. Steers were fed for 112 d. Forage DM yield did not differ between whole plant hybrid rye and barley (3.96 vs. 3.70 mT/ha). During the growing phase, increasing the HRS inclusion at the expense of BARS decreased DMI (quadratic, P = 0.02), average daily gain (ADG; quadratic, P < 0.01), and final BW (quadratic, P = 0.02) with the magnitude of the response increasing with increasing HRS inclusion. In addition, the gain:feed (G:F) ratio linearly decreased (P < 0.01) with increasing HRS inclusion. During finishing, DMI tended to linearly decrease (P = 0.06), ADG decreased and then increased (quadratic, P = 0.04) with the lowest ADG observed for FMED, while G:F was unaffected. Carcass weight for steers fed FMED and FHIGH did not differ but were lighter (quadratic, P = 0.02) than FCON, and dressing percentage decreased linearly from 58.81 to 58.34% (P = 0.03) as HRS inclusion increased. Carcass yield grade and marbling were unaffected. Increasing HRS inclusion at the expense of BARS linearly decreased the proportion of steers with minor (P = 0.02) and severe (P = 0.04) liver abscesses. In conclusion, while forage yield may not differ between hybrid rye and barley, increasing the inclusion rate of HRS in diets for growing steers reduced DMI and ADG. During finishing, increasing the inclusion of HRS may decrease DMI and resulted in lighter hot carcass weight without affecting carcass yield grade or marbling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信