用中子Bragg粉末衍射和中子干涉法重新研究锂及其同位素的束缚相干中子散射长度。

IF 2.6 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 PHYSICS, CONDENSED MATTER
Florian Gehlhaar, Henry E Fischer, Hartmut Lemmel, Kristina Brix, Ralf Kautenburger, Thomas C Hansen, Vanessa Peterson, Holger Kohlmann
{"title":"用中子Bragg粉末衍射和中子干涉法重新研究锂及其同位素的束缚相干中子散射长度。","authors":"Florian Gehlhaar, Henry E Fischer, Hartmut Lemmel, Kristina Brix, Ralf Kautenburger, Thomas C Hansen, Vanessa Peterson, Holger Kohlmann","doi":"10.1088/1361-648X/add3a6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The quality of neutron scattering studies relies upon accurately determined bound coherent neutron scattering lengths<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>, whose standard tabulated values can be in need of review. We have measured integrated Bragg peak intensities via neutron diffraction from LiF powders, as well as scattering-length densities via neutron interferometry on LiF aqueous solutions, to accurately redetermine the<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>values for the lithium isotopes<sup>6</sup>Li and<sup>7</sup>Li, as well as that for naturally occurring elemental Li as a mix of these two isotopes. As compared to earlier studies going back to 1986, our measurements make use of considerably improved instrumentation, and careful attention was given to the experimental procedure as well as to data analysis, in particular to aspects of systematic error. From the neutron diffraction measurements we obtain<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>6</sup>Li)<sub>NPD</sub>= 2.27(2) fm,<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>7</sup>Li)<sub>NPD</sub>= -2.28(2) fm and<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>nat</sup>Li)<sub>NPD</sub>= -1.94(2) fm, in excellent agreement with our interferometry results of<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>6</sup>Li)<sub>INT</sub>= 2.28(4) fm,<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>7</sup>Li)<sub>INT</sub>= -2.28(3) fm and<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>nat</sup>Li)<sub>INT</sub>= -1.93(3) fm, allowing to average them together and to propose recommended values of<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>6</sup>Li)<sub>Rec</sub>. = 2.27(2) fm,<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>7</sup>Li)<sub>Rec</sub>. = -2.28(2) fm and<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>nat</sup>Li)<sub>Rec</sub>= -1.93(2) fm, where all values correspond to pure isotopes or the standard terrestrial isotopic composition of<sup>nat</sup>Li. Compared to standard literature values of<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>6</sup>Li)<sub>Lit.</sub>= 2.0(1) fm,<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>7</sup>Li)<sub>Lit.</sub>= -2.22(2) fm, and<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>nat</sup>Li)<sub>Lit.</sub>= -1.90(3) fm, we note in particular that our recommended value for<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>6</sup>Li) is 14% greater in magnitude, which is well outside of experimental uncertainties. Having obtained nearly identical results using two independent experimental techniques with qualitatively different possible sources of systematic error, we have confidence in our recommended<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>values. We discuss reasons for the observed discrepancies with respect to previously tabulated values, as well as the relative merits of the various methods to measure bound coherent neutron scattering lengths.</p>","PeriodicalId":16776,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reinvestigation of the bound coherent neutron scattering lengths of lithium and its isotopes using neutron Bragg powder diffraction and neutron interferometry.\",\"authors\":\"Florian Gehlhaar, Henry E Fischer, Hartmut Lemmel, Kristina Brix, Ralf Kautenburger, Thomas C Hansen, Vanessa Peterson, Holger Kohlmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-648X/add3a6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The quality of neutron scattering studies relies upon accurately determined bound coherent neutron scattering lengths<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>, whose standard tabulated values can be in need of review. We have measured integrated Bragg peak intensities via neutron diffraction from LiF powders, as well as scattering-length densities via neutron interferometry on LiF aqueous solutions, to accurately redetermine the<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>values for the lithium isotopes<sup>6</sup>Li and<sup>7</sup>Li, as well as that for naturally occurring elemental Li as a mix of these two isotopes. As compared to earlier studies going back to 1986, our measurements make use of considerably improved instrumentation, and careful attention was given to the experimental procedure as well as to data analysis, in particular to aspects of systematic error. From the neutron diffraction measurements we obtain<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>6</sup>Li)<sub>NPD</sub>= 2.27(2) fm,<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>7</sup>Li)<sub>NPD</sub>= -2.28(2) fm and<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>nat</sup>Li)<sub>NPD</sub>= -1.94(2) fm, in excellent agreement with our interferometry results of<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>6</sup>Li)<sub>INT</sub>= 2.28(4) fm,<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>7</sup>Li)<sub>INT</sub>= -2.28(3) fm and<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>nat</sup>Li)<sub>INT</sub>= -1.93(3) fm, allowing to average them together and to propose recommended values of<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>6</sup>Li)<sub>Rec</sub>. = 2.27(2) fm,<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>7</sup>Li)<sub>Rec</sub>. = -2.28(2) fm and<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>nat</sup>Li)<sub>Rec</sub>= -1.93(2) fm, where all values correspond to pure isotopes or the standard terrestrial isotopic composition of<sup>nat</sup>Li. Compared to standard literature values of<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>6</sup>Li)<sub>Lit.</sub>= 2.0(1) fm,<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>7</sup>Li)<sub>Lit.</sub>= -2.22(2) fm, and<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>nat</sup>Li)<sub>Lit.</sub>= -1.90(3) fm, we note in particular that our recommended value for<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>(<sup>6</sup>Li) is 14% greater in magnitude, which is well outside of experimental uncertainties. Having obtained nearly identical results using two independent experimental techniques with qualitatively different possible sources of systematic error, we have confidence in our recommended<i>b</i><sub>c</sub>values. We discuss reasons for the observed discrepancies with respect to previously tabulated values, as well as the relative merits of the various methods to measure bound coherent neutron scattering lengths.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/add3a6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, CONDENSED MATTER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/add3a6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, CONDENSED MATTER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中子散射研究的质量取决于精确确定的束缚相干中子散射长度bc,其标准制表值可能需要审查。我们通过对LiF粉末的中子衍射测量了积分布拉格峰强度,并通过中子干涉测量了LiF水溶液的散射长度密度,以准确地重新确定锂同位素6Li和7Li的bc值,以及作为这两种同位素混合物的自然存在元素Li的bc值。与1986年的早期研究相比,我们的测量使用了大大改进的仪器,并对实验过程和数据分析给予了仔细的关注,特别是对系统误差的方面。从中子衍射测量中,我们得到bc(6Li)NPD = 2.27(2) fm, bc(7Li)NPD = -2.28(2) fm和bc(natLi)NPD = 1.94(2) fm,与我们的干涉测量结果bc(6Li)INT = 2.28(4) fm, bc(7Li)INT = -2.28(3) fm和bc(natLi)INT = -1.93(3) fm非常吻合,可以将它们平均起来并提出bc(6Li)Rec的推荐值。= 2.27(2) fm, bc(7Li)Rec。= -2.28(2) fm和bc(natLi)Rec。= -1.93(2) fm,其中所有值都对应于natLi的纯同位素或标准陆地同位素组成。比较bc(6Li)文学的标准文学价值。= 2.0(1) fm, bc(7Li)Lit。= -2.22(2) fm,和bc(natLi)Lit。= -1.90(3) fm,我们特别注意到bc(6Li)的推荐值在量级上要大14%,这远远超出了实验的不确定性。我们使用两种独立的实验技术获得了几乎相同的结果,但在质量上可能存在不同的系统误差来源,因此我们对推荐的bc值有信心。我们讨论了观测到的差异与先前制表值的原因,以及测量束缚相干中子散射长度的各种方法的相对优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reinvestigation of the bound coherent neutron scattering lengths of lithium and its isotopes using neutron Bragg powder diffraction and neutron interferometry.

The quality of neutron scattering studies relies upon accurately determined bound coherent neutron scattering lengthsbc, whose standard tabulated values can be in need of review. We have measured integrated Bragg peak intensities via neutron diffraction from LiF powders, as well as scattering-length densities via neutron interferometry on LiF aqueous solutions, to accurately redetermine thebcvalues for the lithium isotopes6Li and7Li, as well as that for naturally occurring elemental Li as a mix of these two isotopes. As compared to earlier studies going back to 1986, our measurements make use of considerably improved instrumentation, and careful attention was given to the experimental procedure as well as to data analysis, in particular to aspects of systematic error. From the neutron diffraction measurements we obtainbc(6Li)NPD= 2.27(2) fm,bc(7Li)NPD= -2.28(2) fm andbc(natLi)NPD= -1.94(2) fm, in excellent agreement with our interferometry results ofbc(6Li)INT= 2.28(4) fm,bc(7Li)INT= -2.28(3) fm andbc(natLi)INT= -1.93(3) fm, allowing to average them together and to propose recommended values ofbc(6Li)Rec. = 2.27(2) fm,bc(7Li)Rec. = -2.28(2) fm andbc(natLi)Rec= -1.93(2) fm, where all values correspond to pure isotopes or the standard terrestrial isotopic composition ofnatLi. Compared to standard literature values ofbc(6Li)Lit.= 2.0(1) fm,bc(7Li)Lit.= -2.22(2) fm, andbc(natLi)Lit.= -1.90(3) fm, we note in particular that our recommended value forbc(6Li) is 14% greater in magnitude, which is well outside of experimental uncertainties. Having obtained nearly identical results using two independent experimental techniques with qualitatively different possible sources of systematic error, we have confidence in our recommendedbcvalues. We discuss reasons for the observed discrepancies with respect to previously tabulated values, as well as the relative merits of the various methods to measure bound coherent neutron scattering lengths.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 物理-物理:凝聚态物理
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
1288
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter covers the whole of condensed matter physics including soft condensed matter and nanostructures. Papers may report experimental, theoretical and simulation studies. Note that papers must contain fundamental condensed matter science: papers reporting methods of materials preparation or properties of materials without novel condensed matter content will not be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信