剖宫产后产后出血对体力活动有何影响?

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Mina Felfeli, Samuel Lehn, Meghan Tveit, Devin Hill, Homa K Ahmadzia
{"title":"剖宫产后产后出血对体力活动有何影响?","authors":"Mina Felfeli, Samuel Lehn, Meghan Tveit, Devin Hill, Homa K Ahmadzia","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.70072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study introduces a novel approach, utilizing activity tracking devices (ATDs), such as Fitbit, to monitor mobility during cesarean recovery and investigate the relationship between physical activity (PA) and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective cohort study involving postpartum patients aged 18-50 years who delivered at George Washington University and underwent a scheduled or emergent cesarean from December 2022 to September 2023. The primary outcome was assessing the relationship between PPH and PA for 2 weeks postpartum using the Fitbit. Data from all patients were extracted from the electronic medical records. The Fitbit Model of Inspire was used to monitor patients' PA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistical analyses of the relationship between quantitative blood loss (QBL) during cesarean delivery and average steps per day postpartum found statistically non-significant results (Δ1.16 [1.16%], P = 0.817) for the collective cohort. Excluding one outlier from the patient cohort, analysis of the relationship between the same two variables found statistically significant results (Δ1.83 [1.83%], P = 0.023). A coefficient of 1.83 (1.83%) on the QBL variable was found, signifying that an increase of 1 mL in QBL corresponds to an average decrease of 1.83 (1.83%) in average steps per day postpartum.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study's findings underscore the potential clinical relevance of monitoring PA to identify and address postpartum complications. Further research could explore interventions to mitigate the observed decline in mobility associated with PPH, ultimately enhancing maternal healthcare outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the effect of postpartum hemorrhage on physical activity after cesarean?\",\"authors\":\"Mina Felfeli, Samuel Lehn, Meghan Tveit, Devin Hill, Homa K Ahmadzia\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijgo.70072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study introduces a novel approach, utilizing activity tracking devices (ATDs), such as Fitbit, to monitor mobility during cesarean recovery and investigate the relationship between physical activity (PA) and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective cohort study involving postpartum patients aged 18-50 years who delivered at George Washington University and underwent a scheduled or emergent cesarean from December 2022 to September 2023. The primary outcome was assessing the relationship between PPH and PA for 2 weeks postpartum using the Fitbit. Data from all patients were extracted from the electronic medical records. The Fitbit Model of Inspire was used to monitor patients' PA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistical analyses of the relationship between quantitative blood loss (QBL) during cesarean delivery and average steps per day postpartum found statistically non-significant results (Δ1.16 [1.16%], P = 0.817) for the collective cohort. Excluding one outlier from the patient cohort, analysis of the relationship between the same two variables found statistically significant results (Δ1.83 [1.83%], P = 0.023). A coefficient of 1.83 (1.83%) on the QBL variable was found, signifying that an increase of 1 mL in QBL corresponds to an average decrease of 1.83 (1.83%) in average steps per day postpartum.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study's findings underscore the potential clinical relevance of monitoring PA to identify and address postpartum complications. Further research could explore interventions to mitigate the observed decline in mobility associated with PPH, ultimately enhancing maternal healthcare outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70072\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究介绍了一种新颖的方法,利用活动追踪装置(ATDs),如Fitbit,监测剖宫产恢复过程中的活动能力,探讨体力活动(PA)与产后出血(PPH)的关系。方法:我们对2022年12月至2023年9月在乔治华盛顿大学分娩并接受计划或紧急剖宫产的18-50岁产后患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。主要结果是使用Fitbit评估产后2周PPH和PA之间的关系。所有患者的数据均从电子病历中提取。使用Inspire的Fitbit模型监测患者PA。结果:对集体队列剖宫产定量失血量(QBL)与产后日均步数的关系进行统计分析,结果无统计学意义(Δ1.16 [1.16%], P = 0.817)。在患者队列中排除1个异常值后,对相同两个变量之间的关系进行分析,结果具有统计学意义(Δ1.83 [1.83%], P = 0.023)。QBL变量的系数为1.83(1.83%),表明QBL增加1 mL对应于产后每天平均步数平均减少1.83(1.83%)。结论:本研究结果强调了监测PA识别和处理产后并发症的潜在临床意义。进一步的研究可以探索干预措施,以减轻观察到的与PPH相关的流动性下降,最终提高孕产妇保健结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What is the effect of postpartum hemorrhage on physical activity after cesarean?

Objectives: This study introduces a novel approach, utilizing activity tracking devices (ATDs), such as Fitbit, to monitor mobility during cesarean recovery and investigate the relationship between physical activity (PA) and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH).

Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study involving postpartum patients aged 18-50 years who delivered at George Washington University and underwent a scheduled or emergent cesarean from December 2022 to September 2023. The primary outcome was assessing the relationship between PPH and PA for 2 weeks postpartum using the Fitbit. Data from all patients were extracted from the electronic medical records. The Fitbit Model of Inspire was used to monitor patients' PA.

Results: Statistical analyses of the relationship between quantitative blood loss (QBL) during cesarean delivery and average steps per day postpartum found statistically non-significant results (Δ1.16 [1.16%], P = 0.817) for the collective cohort. Excluding one outlier from the patient cohort, analysis of the relationship between the same two variables found statistically significant results (Δ1.83 [1.83%], P = 0.023). A coefficient of 1.83 (1.83%) on the QBL variable was found, signifying that an increase of 1 mL in QBL corresponds to an average decrease of 1.83 (1.83%) in average steps per day postpartum.

Conclusion: This study's findings underscore the potential clinical relevance of monitoring PA to identify and address postpartum complications. Further research could explore interventions to mitigate the observed decline in mobility associated with PPH, ultimately enhancing maternal healthcare outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信