全髋关节置换术中髋臼缺损自动重建与分析:一项计算模型研究。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Daniel Hopkins, Stuart A Callary, L Bogdan Solomon, Peter V S Lee, David C Ackland
{"title":"全髋关节置换术中髋臼缺损自动重建与分析:一项计算模型研究。","authors":"Daniel Hopkins, Stuart A Callary, L Bogdan Solomon, Peter V S Lee, David C Ackland","doi":"10.1002/jor.26086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) involving large acetabular defects is associated with high early failure rates, primarily due to cup loosening. Most acetabular defect classification systems used in surgical planning are based on planar radiographs and do not encapsulate three-dimensional geometry and morphology of the acetabular defect. This study aimed to develop an automated computational modeling pipeline for rapid generation of three-dimensional acetabular bone defect geometry. The framework employed artificial neural network segmentation of preoperative pelvic computed tomography (CT) images and statistical shape model generation for defect reconstruction in 60 rTHA patients. Regional acetabular absolute defect volumes (ADV), relative defect volumes (RDV) and defect depths (DD) were calculated and stratified within Paprosky classifications. Defect geometries from the automated modeling pipeline were validated against manually reconstructed models and were found to have a mean dice coefficient of 0.827 and a mean relative volume error of 16.4%. The mean ADV, RDV and DD of classification groups generally increased with defect severity. Except for superior RDV and ADV between 3A and 2A defects, and anterior RDV and DD between 3B and 3A defects, statistically significant differences in ADV, RDV or DD were only found between 3B and 2B-2C defects (p < 0.05). Poor correlations observed between ADV, RDV, and DD within Paprosky classifications suggest that quantitative measures are not unique to each Paprosky grade. The automated modeling tools developed may be useful in surgical planning and computational modeling of rTHA.</p>","PeriodicalId":16650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated Acetabular Defect Reconstruction and Analysis for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Computational Modeling Study.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Hopkins, Stuart A Callary, L Bogdan Solomon, Peter V S Lee, David C Ackland\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jor.26086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) involving large acetabular defects is associated with high early failure rates, primarily due to cup loosening. Most acetabular defect classification systems used in surgical planning are based on planar radiographs and do not encapsulate three-dimensional geometry and morphology of the acetabular defect. This study aimed to develop an automated computational modeling pipeline for rapid generation of three-dimensional acetabular bone defect geometry. The framework employed artificial neural network segmentation of preoperative pelvic computed tomography (CT) images and statistical shape model generation for defect reconstruction in 60 rTHA patients. Regional acetabular absolute defect volumes (ADV), relative defect volumes (RDV) and defect depths (DD) were calculated and stratified within Paprosky classifications. Defect geometries from the automated modeling pipeline were validated against manually reconstructed models and were found to have a mean dice coefficient of 0.827 and a mean relative volume error of 16.4%. The mean ADV, RDV and DD of classification groups generally increased with defect severity. Except for superior RDV and ADV between 3A and 2A defects, and anterior RDV and DD between 3B and 3A defects, statistically significant differences in ADV, RDV or DD were only found between 3B and 2B-2C defects (p < 0.05). Poor correlations observed between ADV, RDV, and DD within Paprosky classifications suggest that quantitative measures are not unique to each Paprosky grade. The automated modeling tools developed may be useful in surgical planning and computational modeling of rTHA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.26086\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.26086","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

涉及大髋臼缺损的翻修全髋关节置换术(rTHA)早期失败率高,主要是由于髋臼杯松动。在手术计划中使用的大多数髋臼缺损分类系统是基于平面x线片,而不是包含髋臼缺损的三维几何形状和形态。本研究旨在开发一种自动计算建模管道,用于快速生成三维髋臼骨缺损几何形状。该框架采用人工神经网络分割术前盆腔计算机断层扫描(CT)图像和统计形状模型生成对60例rTHA患者进行缺损重建。计算区域髋臼绝对缺损体积(ADV)、相对缺损体积(RDV)和缺损深度(DD),并按照papprosky分类进行分层。来自自动化建模管道的缺陷几何形状与人工重建的模型进行了验证,发现平均骰子系数为0.827,平均相对体积误差为16.4%。各分类组的平均ADV、RDV和DD均随缺陷严重程度的增加而增加。除3A和2A缺陷的RDV和ADV较优,3B和3A缺陷的RDV和DD较前外,只有3B和2B-2C缺陷的ADV、RDV和DD有统计学差异(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automated Acetabular Defect Reconstruction and Analysis for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Computational Modeling Study.

Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) involving large acetabular defects is associated with high early failure rates, primarily due to cup loosening. Most acetabular defect classification systems used in surgical planning are based on planar radiographs and do not encapsulate three-dimensional geometry and morphology of the acetabular defect. This study aimed to develop an automated computational modeling pipeline for rapid generation of three-dimensional acetabular bone defect geometry. The framework employed artificial neural network segmentation of preoperative pelvic computed tomography (CT) images and statistical shape model generation for defect reconstruction in 60 rTHA patients. Regional acetabular absolute defect volumes (ADV), relative defect volumes (RDV) and defect depths (DD) were calculated and stratified within Paprosky classifications. Defect geometries from the automated modeling pipeline were validated against manually reconstructed models and were found to have a mean dice coefficient of 0.827 and a mean relative volume error of 16.4%. The mean ADV, RDV and DD of classification groups generally increased with defect severity. Except for superior RDV and ADV between 3A and 2A defects, and anterior RDV and DD between 3B and 3A defects, statistically significant differences in ADV, RDV or DD were only found between 3B and 2B-2C defects (p < 0.05). Poor correlations observed between ADV, RDV, and DD within Paprosky classifications suggest that quantitative measures are not unique to each Paprosky grade. The automated modeling tools developed may be useful in surgical planning and computational modeling of rTHA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Journal of Orthopaedic Research® 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Research is the forum for the rapid publication of high quality reports of new information on the full spectrum of orthopaedic research, including life sciences, engineering, translational, and clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信