Zuhaad Hameed, Ved A Vengsarkar, Clare K Green, Bhavana Yalamuru, Adam L Shimer, Stephen D Lockey
{"title":"术前硬膜外注射类固醇会增加颈椎间盘置换术后并发症的风险吗?","authors":"Zuhaad Hameed, Ved A Vengsarkar, Clare K Green, Bhavana Yalamuru, Adam L Shimer, Stephen D Lockey","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective database analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether any associations exist between the use of preoperative epidural steroid injections (ESIs) and postoperative complications following cervical disc replacement (CDR).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Preoperative ESIs are a commonly used modality for patients with cervical spine pathology. Previous studies have demonstrated cervical ESIs to be associated with higher complications after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. To date, there is little known about the impact of cervical ESIs on the postoperative outcomes after CDR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PearlDiver Database was queried for patients who underwent CDR between 2010 and 2022. Patients were stratified based on ESI use within 90 days prior to surgery. Propensity-score matching was used to account for baseline differences. Outcomes collected included 90-day complications, readmissions, and 2-year reoperation rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients receiving preoperative ESI had significantly higher rates of postoperative urinary tract infections (3.2% vs. 1.6%, OR=2.03, P<0.001). Recurrent radiculopathy was more prevalent in the ESI group (63.1% vs. 16.1%, OR=9.02, P<0.001), and ESI patients experienced a higher rate of revision surgery within 2 years compared to control patients (7.8% vs. 2.4%, OR=3.50, P<0.001). Additionally, ESI patients experienced higher rates of emergency department visits at 30 days (6.2% vs. 4.8%, OR=1.31, P=0.020), and readmission rates at both 30 days (2.8% vs. 1.1%, OR=2.52, P<0.001) and 90 days (9.7% vs. 2.0%, OR=5.29, P<0.001) postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative ESI within 90 days of surgery is associated with increased rates of postoperative complications, readmissions, and reoperation following CDR.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Preoperative Epidural Steroid Injections Increase the Risk of Postoperative Complications Following Cervical Disc Replacement?\",\"authors\":\"Zuhaad Hameed, Ved A Vengsarkar, Clare K Green, Bhavana Yalamuru, Adam L Shimer, Stephen D Lockey\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective database analysis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether any associations exist between the use of preoperative epidural steroid injections (ESIs) and postoperative complications following cervical disc replacement (CDR).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Preoperative ESIs are a commonly used modality for patients with cervical spine pathology. Previous studies have demonstrated cervical ESIs to be associated with higher complications after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. To date, there is little known about the impact of cervical ESIs on the postoperative outcomes after CDR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PearlDiver Database was queried for patients who underwent CDR between 2010 and 2022. Patients were stratified based on ESI use within 90 days prior to surgery. Propensity-score matching was used to account for baseline differences. Outcomes collected included 90-day complications, readmissions, and 2-year reoperation rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients receiving preoperative ESI had significantly higher rates of postoperative urinary tract infections (3.2% vs. 1.6%, OR=2.03, P<0.001). Recurrent radiculopathy was more prevalent in the ESI group (63.1% vs. 16.1%, OR=9.02, P<0.001), and ESI patients experienced a higher rate of revision surgery within 2 years compared to control patients (7.8% vs. 2.4%, OR=3.50, P<0.001). Additionally, ESI patients experienced higher rates of emergency department visits at 30 days (6.2% vs. 4.8%, OR=1.31, P=0.020), and readmission rates at both 30 days (2.8% vs. 1.1%, OR=2.52, P<0.001) and 90 days (9.7% vs. 2.0%, OR=5.29, P<0.001) postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative ESI within 90 days of surgery is associated with increased rates of postoperative complications, readmissions, and reoperation following CDR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005376\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005376","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究设计:回顾性数据库分析。目的:探讨术前硬膜外类固醇注射(ESIs)与颈椎间盘置换术(CDR)术后并发症之间是否存在关联。背景资料总结:术前穿刺是颈椎病变患者常用的一种方式。先前的研究表明,颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术后的并发症较高。迄今为止,关于宫颈穿刺对CDR术后预后的影响知之甚少。方法:查询PearlDiver数据库中2010 - 2022年间接受CDR的患者。根据术前90天内ESI的使用情况对患者进行分层。倾向得分匹配用于解释基线差异。收集的结果包括90天的并发症、再入院率和2年的再手术率。结果:术前接受ESI的患者术后尿路感染发生率明显较高(3.2% vs. 1.6%, OR=2.03, p)。结论:手术后90天内术前ESI与CDR术后并发症、再入院和再手术发生率增加相关。
Do Preoperative Epidural Steroid Injections Increase the Risk of Postoperative Complications Following Cervical Disc Replacement?
Study design: Retrospective database analysis.
Objective: To determine whether any associations exist between the use of preoperative epidural steroid injections (ESIs) and postoperative complications following cervical disc replacement (CDR).
Summary of background data: Preoperative ESIs are a commonly used modality for patients with cervical spine pathology. Previous studies have demonstrated cervical ESIs to be associated with higher complications after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. To date, there is little known about the impact of cervical ESIs on the postoperative outcomes after CDR.
Methods: The PearlDiver Database was queried for patients who underwent CDR between 2010 and 2022. Patients were stratified based on ESI use within 90 days prior to surgery. Propensity-score matching was used to account for baseline differences. Outcomes collected included 90-day complications, readmissions, and 2-year reoperation rates.
Results: Patients receiving preoperative ESI had significantly higher rates of postoperative urinary tract infections (3.2% vs. 1.6%, OR=2.03, P<0.001). Recurrent radiculopathy was more prevalent in the ESI group (63.1% vs. 16.1%, OR=9.02, P<0.001), and ESI patients experienced a higher rate of revision surgery within 2 years compared to control patients (7.8% vs. 2.4%, OR=3.50, P<0.001). Additionally, ESI patients experienced higher rates of emergency department visits at 30 days (6.2% vs. 4.8%, OR=1.31, P=0.020), and readmission rates at both 30 days (2.8% vs. 1.1%, OR=2.52, P<0.001) and 90 days (9.7% vs. 2.0%, OR=5.29, P<0.001) postoperatively.
Conclusion: Preoperative ESI within 90 days of surgery is associated with increased rates of postoperative complications, readmissions, and reoperation following CDR.
期刊介绍:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store.
Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.