提高软骨修复评估的可靠性:一种基于体积的简化方法。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Jani Puhakka, Teemu Paatela, Eve Salonius, Virpi Muhonen, Anna Meller, Anna Vasara, Hannu Kautiainen, Jussi Kosola, Ilkka Kiviranta
{"title":"提高软骨修复评估的可靠性:一种基于体积的简化方法。","authors":"Jani Puhakka, Teemu Paatela, Eve Salonius, Virpi Muhonen, Anna Meller, Anna Vasara, Hannu Kautiainen, Jussi Kosola, Ilkka Kiviranta","doi":"10.1002/jor.26096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to explore methods for enhancing the reliability of arthroscopic cartilage repair evaluation. We compared a new volume-based scoring technique that assessed the extent of high-quality cartilage repair tissue in four quadrants of the repair tissue with the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score. Using a porcine cartilage repair model, we evaluated the inter- and intrarater reliability of the new volume-based technique. Nine defects were treated with a recombinant human Type III collagen/polylactide scaffold, whereas nine were left to heal spontaneously. The reliability of the volume-based score was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and external validation was performed by comparing the score with histological ICRS II results. The volume-based score demonstrated moderate to good interrater reliability (ICC 0.67-0.78) and intrarater reliability (ICC 0.58-0.84), outperforming the ICRS score in consistency. Moderate positive correlations were observed between the volume-based score and histological ICRS II subscores (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.62-0.64, p < 0.001). These findings suggest that the volume-based approach may improve the reliability of arthroscopic cartilage repair assessment without significantly compromising the alignment with histological evaluations. Although the simplified system offers advantages in reproducibility, further refinement is necessary to balance reliability with the need for comprehensive tissue evaluation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostics, Level III (based on comparative studies in an animal model with blinding between observers). STATEMENT OF CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides insights into improving the reliability of arthroscopic cartilage repair evaluations, potentially leading to more consistent and accurate assessments in both clinical and research settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing the Reliability of Cartilage Repair Evaluation: A Simplified Volume-Based Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Jani Puhakka, Teemu Paatela, Eve Salonius, Virpi Muhonen, Anna Meller, Anna Vasara, Hannu Kautiainen, Jussi Kosola, Ilkka Kiviranta\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jor.26096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to explore methods for enhancing the reliability of arthroscopic cartilage repair evaluation. We compared a new volume-based scoring technique that assessed the extent of high-quality cartilage repair tissue in four quadrants of the repair tissue with the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score. Using a porcine cartilage repair model, we evaluated the inter- and intrarater reliability of the new volume-based technique. Nine defects were treated with a recombinant human Type III collagen/polylactide scaffold, whereas nine were left to heal spontaneously. The reliability of the volume-based score was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and external validation was performed by comparing the score with histological ICRS II results. The volume-based score demonstrated moderate to good interrater reliability (ICC 0.67-0.78) and intrarater reliability (ICC 0.58-0.84), outperforming the ICRS score in consistency. Moderate positive correlations were observed between the volume-based score and histological ICRS II subscores (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.62-0.64, p < 0.001). These findings suggest that the volume-based approach may improve the reliability of arthroscopic cartilage repair assessment without significantly compromising the alignment with histological evaluations. Although the simplified system offers advantages in reproducibility, further refinement is necessary to balance reliability with the need for comprehensive tissue evaluation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostics, Level III (based on comparative studies in an animal model with blinding between observers). STATEMENT OF CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides insights into improving the reliability of arthroscopic cartilage repair evaluations, potentially leading to more consistent and accurate assessments in both clinical and research settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.26096\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.26096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨提高关节镜下软骨修复评估可靠性的方法。我们比较了一种新的基于体积的评分技术,该技术评估了修复组织的四个象限中高质量软骨修复组织的程度与国际软骨修复协会(ICRS)评分。利用猪软骨修复模型,我们评估了基于体积的新技术在体内和体内的可靠性。用重组人III型胶原/聚乳酸支架治疗9个缺损,其余9个自行愈合。采用类内相关系数(ICCs)分析容积评分的信度,并通过将评分与组织学ICRS II结果进行比较进行外部验证。基于体积的评分表现出中等至良好的量表间信度(ICC 0.67-0.78)和量表内信度(ICC 0.58-0.84),在一致性方面优于ICRS评分。体积评分与组织学ICRS II评分呈正相关(rs = 0.62-0.64, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing the Reliability of Cartilage Repair Evaluation: A Simplified Volume-Based Approach.

The purpose of this study was to explore methods for enhancing the reliability of arthroscopic cartilage repair evaluation. We compared a new volume-based scoring technique that assessed the extent of high-quality cartilage repair tissue in four quadrants of the repair tissue with the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) score. Using a porcine cartilage repair model, we evaluated the inter- and intrarater reliability of the new volume-based technique. Nine defects were treated with a recombinant human Type III collagen/polylactide scaffold, whereas nine were left to heal spontaneously. The reliability of the volume-based score was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and external validation was performed by comparing the score with histological ICRS II results. The volume-based score demonstrated moderate to good interrater reliability (ICC 0.67-0.78) and intrarater reliability (ICC 0.58-0.84), outperforming the ICRS score in consistency. Moderate positive correlations were observed between the volume-based score and histological ICRS II subscores (rs = 0.62-0.64, p < 0.001). These findings suggest that the volume-based approach may improve the reliability of arthroscopic cartilage repair assessment without significantly compromising the alignment with histological evaluations. Although the simplified system offers advantages in reproducibility, further refinement is necessary to balance reliability with the need for comprehensive tissue evaluation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostics, Level III (based on comparative studies in an animal model with blinding between observers). STATEMENT OF CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides insights into improving the reliability of arthroscopic cartilage repair evaluations, potentially leading to more consistent and accurate assessments in both clinical and research settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Journal of Orthopaedic Research® 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Research is the forum for the rapid publication of high quality reports of new information on the full spectrum of orthopaedic research, including life sciences, engineering, translational, and clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信