农场小牛呼吸道疾病诊断方法与胸片的比较

IF 1.9 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Veterinary Medicine International Pub Date : 2025-04-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/vmi/5539202
João Paulo Andrade, Gabriela Anteveli, Bárbara de Andrade Alves, Layanne D Ferreira, Filipe L M Mendonça, Rafael J Silva, Jerusa Catarina Camillo, Markus V V Araújo, Luana C A Ferreira, Anelise Carvalho Nepomuceno, Rafael Resende Faleiros, Tiago Facury Moreira, Elias Jorge Facury Filho, Rodrigo Melo Meneses, Antônio Último de Carvalho
{"title":"农场小牛呼吸道疾病诊断方法与胸片的比较","authors":"João Paulo Andrade, Gabriela Anteveli, Bárbara de Andrade Alves, Layanne D Ferreira, Filipe L M Mendonça, Rafael J Silva, Jerusa Catarina Camillo, Markus V V Araújo, Luana C A Ferreira, Anelise Carvalho Nepomuceno, Rafael Resende Faleiros, Tiago Facury Moreira, Elias Jorge Facury Filho, Rodrigo Melo Meneses, Antônio Último de Carvalho","doi":"10.1155/vmi/5539202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The most commonly used techniques in the field are the pulmonary auscultation, Wisconsin score (WI), California score (CA), and pulmonary ultrasonography. However, with the exception of the latter, no studies have compared thoracic radiography with other possible techniques in calves. Therefore, the objective of the study was to compare and verify the agreement between clinical score techniques, pulmonary auscultation, and ultrasonographic and radiographic evaluations, considering the latter as reference test. Thirty-three calves were evaluated from 17 to 60 days of age using pulmonary auscultation, Wisconsin score (WI), California score (CA), thoracic radiography, and pulmonary ultrasonography at five preestablished moments and at any time when presenting clinical respiratory disease. Of the 160 evaluations, 21% were positive for thoracic radiography, 21% for ultrasonography, 10% for pulmonary auscultation, 16% for CA score, and 14% for WI score. In the concordance analysis, there was a moderate correlation between thoracic radiography and ultrasonography (<i>k</i> = 0.6035) and between pulmonary auscultation and WI score (<i>k</i> = 0.5833) and CA score (<i>k</i> = 0.5277), and substantial between the WI and CA score methods (<i>k</i> = 0.7258). All techniques used in the study were useful for the diagnosis of pneumonia; however, due to high accuracy and practicality, ultrasonography proved to be an interesting method to be implemented on farms.</p>","PeriodicalId":23503,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Medicine International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"5539202"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12043388/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Diagnostic Methods for Respiratory Disease in Calves Used on Farms With Thoracic Radiography.\",\"authors\":\"João Paulo Andrade, Gabriela Anteveli, Bárbara de Andrade Alves, Layanne D Ferreira, Filipe L M Mendonça, Rafael J Silva, Jerusa Catarina Camillo, Markus V V Araújo, Luana C A Ferreira, Anelise Carvalho Nepomuceno, Rafael Resende Faleiros, Tiago Facury Moreira, Elias Jorge Facury Filho, Rodrigo Melo Meneses, Antônio Último de Carvalho\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/vmi/5539202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The most commonly used techniques in the field are the pulmonary auscultation, Wisconsin score (WI), California score (CA), and pulmonary ultrasonography. However, with the exception of the latter, no studies have compared thoracic radiography with other possible techniques in calves. Therefore, the objective of the study was to compare and verify the agreement between clinical score techniques, pulmonary auscultation, and ultrasonographic and radiographic evaluations, considering the latter as reference test. Thirty-three calves were evaluated from 17 to 60 days of age using pulmonary auscultation, Wisconsin score (WI), California score (CA), thoracic radiography, and pulmonary ultrasonography at five preestablished moments and at any time when presenting clinical respiratory disease. Of the 160 evaluations, 21% were positive for thoracic radiography, 21% for ultrasonography, 10% for pulmonary auscultation, 16% for CA score, and 14% for WI score. In the concordance analysis, there was a moderate correlation between thoracic radiography and ultrasonography (<i>k</i> = 0.6035) and between pulmonary auscultation and WI score (<i>k</i> = 0.5833) and CA score (<i>k</i> = 0.5277), and substantial between the WI and CA score methods (<i>k</i> = 0.7258). All techniques used in the study were useful for the diagnosis of pneumonia; however, due to high accuracy and practicality, ultrasonography proved to be an interesting method to be implemented on farms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Medicine International\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"5539202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12043388/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Medicine International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/vmi/5539202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Medicine International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/vmi/5539202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该领域最常用的技术是肺听诊、威斯康星评分(WI)、加利福尼亚评分(CA)和肺超声检查。然而,除了后者之外,没有研究将胸片与其他可能的小牛技术进行比较。因此,本研究的目的是比较和验证临床评分技术、肺听诊、超声和影像学评价之间的一致性,并将后者作为参考检查。在预先设定的5个时刻和出现临床呼吸系统疾病的任何时间,使用肺部听诊、威斯康星评分(WI)、加利福尼亚评分(CA)、胸部x线摄影和肺部超声检查对33头犊牛进行评估,时间为17至60日龄。在160次评估中,21%的胸部x线片阳性,21%的超声检查阳性,10%的肺听诊阳性,16%的CA评分阳性,14%的WI评分阳性。在一致性分析中,胸片与超声检查、肺听诊与WI评分(k = 0.5833)、CA评分(k = 0.5277)之间存在中度相关性(k = 0.6035), WI评分与CA评分方法之间存在显著相关性(k = 0.7258)。研究中使用的所有技术都对肺炎的诊断有用;然而,由于准确性高和实用性,超声检查被证明是一种有趣的方法,可以在农场实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Diagnostic Methods for Respiratory Disease in Calves Used on Farms With Thoracic Radiography.

The most commonly used techniques in the field are the pulmonary auscultation, Wisconsin score (WI), California score (CA), and pulmonary ultrasonography. However, with the exception of the latter, no studies have compared thoracic radiography with other possible techniques in calves. Therefore, the objective of the study was to compare and verify the agreement between clinical score techniques, pulmonary auscultation, and ultrasonographic and radiographic evaluations, considering the latter as reference test. Thirty-three calves were evaluated from 17 to 60 days of age using pulmonary auscultation, Wisconsin score (WI), California score (CA), thoracic radiography, and pulmonary ultrasonography at five preestablished moments and at any time when presenting clinical respiratory disease. Of the 160 evaluations, 21% were positive for thoracic radiography, 21% for ultrasonography, 10% for pulmonary auscultation, 16% for CA score, and 14% for WI score. In the concordance analysis, there was a moderate correlation between thoracic radiography and ultrasonography (k = 0.6035) and between pulmonary auscultation and WI score (k = 0.5833) and CA score (k = 0.5277), and substantial between the WI and CA score methods (k = 0.7258). All techniques used in the study were useful for the diagnosis of pneumonia; however, due to high accuracy and practicality, ultrasonography proved to be an interesting method to be implemented on farms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary Medicine International
Veterinary Medicine International Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
55
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Medicine International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles and review articles in all areas of veterinary research. The journal will consider articles on the biological basis of disease, as well as diagnosis, prevention, treatment, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信