质子泵抑制剂与口服抗凝剂使用者胃肠道出血风险之间的关系。

npj Cardiovascular Health Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-12 DOI:10.1038/s44325-024-00037-3
Zixuan Wang, Qiuyan Yu, Charlotte Warren-Gash, Krishnan Bhaskaran, Clémence Leyrat, Ka Shing Cheung, Celine S L Chui, Esther W Chan, Ian C K Wong, Amitava Banerjee, Liam Smeeth, Ian J Douglas, Angel Y S Wong
{"title":"质子泵抑制剂与口服抗凝剂使用者胃肠道出血风险之间的关系。","authors":"Zixuan Wang, Qiuyan Yu, Charlotte Warren-Gash, Krishnan Bhaskaran, Clémence Leyrat, Ka Shing Cheung, Celine S L Chui, Esther W Chan, Ian C K Wong, Amitava Banerjee, Liam Smeeth, Ian J Douglas, Angel Y S Wong","doi":"10.1038/s44325-024-00037-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current evidence of whether proton pump inhibitor (PPI) reduces the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) associated with oral anticoagulants (OACs) is limited. Propensity score-weighted cohort and case-crossover studies were conducted separately in England and Hong Kong between 2011.01.01 and 2019.12.31. In the cohort design, we compared the hazards of hospitalised GIB in <b><i>OAC</i></b>  +  <b><i>PPI</i></b> users with <b><i>OAC only</i></b> users in people with atrial fibrillation and found higher hazard of GIB in <b><i>OAC</i></b>  +  <b><i>PPI</i></b> users in both settings. In the case-crossover design, elevated odds of exposure to <b><i>PPI only</i></b> , <b><i>OAC only</i></b> and <b><i>OAC</i></b>  +  <b><i>PPI</i></b> associated with GIB between 30-day hazard and referent periods were similarly found in both settings. Overall, the evidence of an elevated risk of <b><i>OAC</i></b>  +  <b><i>PPI</i></b> associated with GIB compared with <b><i>OAC only</i></b> was modest in the cohort study. Our case-crossover study suggested that residual confounding is likely to explain the association, suggesting that concomitant prescription of PPI with OAC did not modify GIB.</p>","PeriodicalId":501706,"journal":{"name":"npj Cardiovascular Health","volume":"2 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11993357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association between proton pump inhibitors and the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in oral anticoagulants users.\",\"authors\":\"Zixuan Wang, Qiuyan Yu, Charlotte Warren-Gash, Krishnan Bhaskaran, Clémence Leyrat, Ka Shing Cheung, Celine S L Chui, Esther W Chan, Ian C K Wong, Amitava Banerjee, Liam Smeeth, Ian J Douglas, Angel Y S Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s44325-024-00037-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Current evidence of whether proton pump inhibitor (PPI) reduces the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) associated with oral anticoagulants (OACs) is limited. Propensity score-weighted cohort and case-crossover studies were conducted separately in England and Hong Kong between 2011.01.01 and 2019.12.31. In the cohort design, we compared the hazards of hospitalised GIB in <b><i>OAC</i></b>  +  <b><i>PPI</i></b> users with <b><i>OAC only</i></b> users in people with atrial fibrillation and found higher hazard of GIB in <b><i>OAC</i></b>  +  <b><i>PPI</i></b> users in both settings. In the case-crossover design, elevated odds of exposure to <b><i>PPI only</i></b> , <b><i>OAC only</i></b> and <b><i>OAC</i></b>  +  <b><i>PPI</i></b> associated with GIB between 30-day hazard and referent periods were similarly found in both settings. Overall, the evidence of an elevated risk of <b><i>OAC</i></b>  +  <b><i>PPI</i></b> associated with GIB compared with <b><i>OAC only</i></b> was modest in the cohort study. Our case-crossover study suggested that residual confounding is likely to explain the association, suggesting that concomitant prescription of PPI with OAC did not modify GIB.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"npj Cardiovascular Health\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11993357/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"npj Cardiovascular Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44325-024-00037-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Cardiovascular Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44325-024-00037-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前关于质子泵抑制剂(PPI)是否降低与口服抗凝剂(OACs)相关的胃肠道出血(GIB)风险的证据有限。倾向评分加权队列和病例交叉研究分别于2011.01.01至2019.12.31在英国和香港进行。在队列设计中,我们比较了房颤患者中OAC + PPI使用者与仅使用OAC的房颤患者住院GIB的风险,发现两种情况下OAC + PPI使用者的GIB风险更高。在病例交叉设计中,在这两种情况下,在30天的危险期和参考期内,仅暴露于PPI、仅暴露于OAC和OAC + PPI与GIB相关的几率也同样升高。总体而言,在队列研究中,与OAC相比,OAC + PPI与GIB相关的风险升高的证据并不明显。我们的病例交叉研究表明,残留的混杂因素可能解释了这种关联,表明PPI与OAC合用并没有改变GIB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The association between proton pump inhibitors and the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in oral anticoagulants users.

Current evidence of whether proton pump inhibitor (PPI) reduces the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) associated with oral anticoagulants (OACs) is limited. Propensity score-weighted cohort and case-crossover studies were conducted separately in England and Hong Kong between 2011.01.01 and 2019.12.31. In the cohort design, we compared the hazards of hospitalised GIB in OAC  +  PPI users with OAC only users in people with atrial fibrillation and found higher hazard of GIB in OAC  +  PPI users in both settings. In the case-crossover design, elevated odds of exposure to PPI only , OAC only and OAC  +  PPI associated with GIB between 30-day hazard and referent periods were similarly found in both settings. Overall, the evidence of an elevated risk of OAC  +  PPI associated with GIB compared with OAC only was modest in the cohort study. Our case-crossover study suggested that residual confounding is likely to explain the association, suggesting that concomitant prescription of PPI with OAC did not modify GIB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信