Matthew Young, Yuri Suico, Omid Kyle Vojdani, Janine McCready, Kevin Katz, Scarlett Pourmatin, Manija Rahimi, Christie Vermeiren, Jeff Powis, Christopher Kandel
{"title":"用于流感和呼吸道合胞病毒检测的口鼻标本采集的验证。","authors":"Matthew Young, Yuri Suico, Omid Kyle Vojdani, Janine McCready, Kevin Katz, Scarlett Pourmatin, Manija Rahimi, Christie Vermeiren, Jeff Powis, Christopher Kandel","doi":"10.1017/ash.2025.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Respiratory virus testing is routinely performed and ways to obtain specimens aside from a nasopharyngeal swab are needed for pandemic preparedness. The main objective is to validate a self-collected oral-nasal swab for the detection of Influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Diagnostic test validation of a self-collected oral nasal swab as compared to a provider-collected nasopharyngeal swab.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Emergency Department at Michael Garron Hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Consecutive individuals who presented to the Emergency Department with a suspected viral upper respiratory tract infection were included if they self-collected an oral-nasal swab. Individuals testing positive for Influenza or RSV along with randomly selected participants who tested negative were eligible for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>All participants had the paired oral-nasal swab tested using a multiplex respiratory virus polymerase chain reaction for the three respiratory pathogens and compared to the nasopharyngeal swab.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>48 individuals tested positive for Influenza, severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or RSV along with 80 who tested negative. 110 were symptomatic with the median time from symptom onset to testing of 1 day (interquartile range 2-5 days). Using the clinical nasopharyngeal swab as the reference standard, the sensitivity was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.43-0.95) and specificity was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.93-1.00) for RSV, sensitivity is 0.67 (95% CI, 0.49-0.81) and specificity is 0.96 (95% CI, 0.89-0.99) for Influenza.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiplex testing with a self-collected oral-nasal swab for Influenza and RSV is not an acceptable substitute for a healthcare provider collected nasopharyngeal swab primarily due to suboptimal Influenza test characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":72246,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","volume":"5 1","pages":"e99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of oral-nasal specimen collection for influenza and respiratory syncytial virus detection.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Young, Yuri Suico, Omid Kyle Vojdani, Janine McCready, Kevin Katz, Scarlett Pourmatin, Manija Rahimi, Christie Vermeiren, Jeff Powis, Christopher Kandel\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ash.2025.66\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Respiratory virus testing is routinely performed and ways to obtain specimens aside from a nasopharyngeal swab are needed for pandemic preparedness. The main objective is to validate a self-collected oral-nasal swab for the detection of Influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Diagnostic test validation of a self-collected oral nasal swab as compared to a provider-collected nasopharyngeal swab.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Emergency Department at Michael Garron Hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Consecutive individuals who presented to the Emergency Department with a suspected viral upper respiratory tract infection were included if they self-collected an oral-nasal swab. Individuals testing positive for Influenza or RSV along with randomly selected participants who tested negative were eligible for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>All participants had the paired oral-nasal swab tested using a multiplex respiratory virus polymerase chain reaction for the three respiratory pathogens and compared to the nasopharyngeal swab.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>48 individuals tested positive for Influenza, severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or RSV along with 80 who tested negative. 110 were symptomatic with the median time from symptom onset to testing of 1 day (interquartile range 2-5 days). Using the clinical nasopharyngeal swab as the reference standard, the sensitivity was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.43-0.95) and specificity was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.93-1.00) for RSV, sensitivity is 0.67 (95% CI, 0.49-0.81) and specificity is 0.96 (95% CI, 0.89-0.99) for Influenza.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiplex testing with a self-collected oral-nasal swab for Influenza and RSV is not an acceptable substitute for a healthcare provider collected nasopharyngeal swab primarily due to suboptimal Influenza test characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"e99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022927/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.66\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2025.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of oral-nasal specimen collection for influenza and respiratory syncytial virus detection.
Objective: Respiratory virus testing is routinely performed and ways to obtain specimens aside from a nasopharyngeal swab are needed for pandemic preparedness. The main objective is to validate a self-collected oral-nasal swab for the detection of Influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).
Design: Diagnostic test validation of a self-collected oral nasal swab as compared to a provider-collected nasopharyngeal swab.
Setting: Emergency Department at Michael Garron Hospital.
Participants: Consecutive individuals who presented to the Emergency Department with a suspected viral upper respiratory tract infection were included if they self-collected an oral-nasal swab. Individuals testing positive for Influenza or RSV along with randomly selected participants who tested negative were eligible for inclusion.
Interventions: All participants had the paired oral-nasal swab tested using a multiplex respiratory virus polymerase chain reaction for the three respiratory pathogens and compared to the nasopharyngeal swab.
Results: 48 individuals tested positive for Influenza, severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or RSV along with 80 who tested negative. 110 were symptomatic with the median time from symptom onset to testing of 1 day (interquartile range 2-5 days). Using the clinical nasopharyngeal swab as the reference standard, the sensitivity was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.43-0.95) and specificity was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.93-1.00) for RSV, sensitivity is 0.67 (95% CI, 0.49-0.81) and specificity is 0.96 (95% CI, 0.89-0.99) for Influenza.
Conclusions: Multiplex testing with a self-collected oral-nasal swab for Influenza and RSV is not an acceptable substitute for a healthcare provider collected nasopharyngeal swab primarily due to suboptimal Influenza test characteristics.