某学术医疗中心快速伴侣治疗的评估与实施。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Sexual health Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1071/SH25035
Alena Kathryn Hoover, Leroy R Thacker, Frances E Casey
{"title":"某学术医疗中心快速伴侣治疗的评估与实施。","authors":"Alena Kathryn Hoover, Leroy R Thacker, Frances E Casey","doi":"10.1071/SH25035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Expedited Partner Therapy (EPT) is the practice of treating sexual partner(s) of patients diagnosed with STIs without examining the partner(s) and is effective in reducing reinfection. It has been permissible in Virginia since 2020. This study aimed to assess knowledge and practices surrounding prescription of EPT at an academic medical center in Virginia before and after an online learning module. Methods Data were obtained via online anonymous RedCap surveys. The first was distributed via e-mail to providers who regularly diagnose and treat STIs at an academic medical center in Virginia. The survey assessed provider knowledge and practices regarding EPT and preference of future education. On the basis of the results, an online learning module with information on EPT was created and distributed to the same population of providers. The module contained pre- and post-module surveys evaluating participant knowledge of the legal status, methods of prescription, and attitudes surrounding EPT. Results The initial survey showed that 10% of participants were aware of the new legal status of EPT. In terms of EPT prescription, 4% always prescribed EPT, 14% prescribed it sometimes, and 61% never prescribed it. In the pre-module survey, 31% of respondents correctly identified one option for prescription of EPT. Knowledge surrounding the legal status and prescription methods was significantly improved in the post-module responses, with 100% of participants able to identify one correct prescription option. Conclusion These results show knowledge gaps surrounding the Virginia EPT provision and policy change. These gaps improved with the implementation of an online learning module. Further evaluation is needed to assess the continued implementation of EPT.</p>","PeriodicalId":22165,"journal":{"name":"Sexual health","volume":"22 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment and implementation of Expedited Partner Therapy at an academic medical center.\",\"authors\":\"Alena Kathryn Hoover, Leroy R Thacker, Frances E Casey\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/SH25035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Expedited Partner Therapy (EPT) is the practice of treating sexual partner(s) of patients diagnosed with STIs without examining the partner(s) and is effective in reducing reinfection. It has been permissible in Virginia since 2020. This study aimed to assess knowledge and practices surrounding prescription of EPT at an academic medical center in Virginia before and after an online learning module. Methods Data were obtained via online anonymous RedCap surveys. The first was distributed via e-mail to providers who regularly diagnose and treat STIs at an academic medical center in Virginia. The survey assessed provider knowledge and practices regarding EPT and preference of future education. On the basis of the results, an online learning module with information on EPT was created and distributed to the same population of providers. The module contained pre- and post-module surveys evaluating participant knowledge of the legal status, methods of prescription, and attitudes surrounding EPT. Results The initial survey showed that 10% of participants were aware of the new legal status of EPT. In terms of EPT prescription, 4% always prescribed EPT, 14% prescribed it sometimes, and 61% never prescribed it. In the pre-module survey, 31% of respondents correctly identified one option for prescription of EPT. Knowledge surrounding the legal status and prescription methods was significantly improved in the post-module responses, with 100% of participants able to identify one correct prescription option. Conclusion These results show knowledge gaps surrounding the Virginia EPT provision and policy change. These gaps improved with the implementation of an online learning module. Further evaluation is needed to assess the continued implementation of EPT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexual health\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexual health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/SH25035\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/SH25035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:快速伴侣治疗(EPT)是在不检查性传播感染患者的性伴侣的情况下治疗性传播感染患者的一种方法,可有效减少再感染。自2020年以来,这在弗吉尼亚州是允许的。本研究旨在评估弗吉尼亚州一家学术医疗中心在在线学习模块前后关于EPT处方的知识和实践。方法通过在线匿名RedCap调查获取数据。第一份是通过电子邮件发送给弗吉尼亚州一家学术医疗中心定期诊断和治疗性传播感染的医生。该调查评估了提供者对EPT的知识和实践以及对未来教育的偏好。根据结果,创建了一个包含EPT信息的在线学习模块,并将其分发给相同的提供者群体。该模块包括模块前和模块后的调查,评估参与者对EPT的法律地位、处方方法和态度的了解。结果初步调查显示,10%的参与者了解EPT的新法律地位。在EPT处方方面,4%的患者经常使用EPT, 14%的患者有时使用EPT, 61%的患者从不使用EPT。在模块前的调查中,31%的受访者正确地确定了EPT处方的一种选择。在模块后的回答中,关于法律地位和处方方法的知识得到了显着提高,100%的参与者能够识别一个正确的处方选项。结论这些结果显示了弗吉尼亚州EPT规定和政策变化的知识差距。这些差距随着在线学习模块的实施而得到改善。需要进一步的评估来评估EPT的持续实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment and implementation of Expedited Partner Therapy at an academic medical center.

Background Expedited Partner Therapy (EPT) is the practice of treating sexual partner(s) of patients diagnosed with STIs without examining the partner(s) and is effective in reducing reinfection. It has been permissible in Virginia since 2020. This study aimed to assess knowledge and practices surrounding prescription of EPT at an academic medical center in Virginia before and after an online learning module. Methods Data were obtained via online anonymous RedCap surveys. The first was distributed via e-mail to providers who regularly diagnose and treat STIs at an academic medical center in Virginia. The survey assessed provider knowledge and practices regarding EPT and preference of future education. On the basis of the results, an online learning module with information on EPT was created and distributed to the same population of providers. The module contained pre- and post-module surveys evaluating participant knowledge of the legal status, methods of prescription, and attitudes surrounding EPT. Results The initial survey showed that 10% of participants were aware of the new legal status of EPT. In terms of EPT prescription, 4% always prescribed EPT, 14% prescribed it sometimes, and 61% never prescribed it. In the pre-module survey, 31% of respondents correctly identified one option for prescription of EPT. Knowledge surrounding the legal status and prescription methods was significantly improved in the post-module responses, with 100% of participants able to identify one correct prescription option. Conclusion These results show knowledge gaps surrounding the Virginia EPT provision and policy change. These gaps improved with the implementation of an online learning module. Further evaluation is needed to assess the continued implementation of EPT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual health
Sexual health 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexual Health publishes original and significant contributions to the fields of sexual health including HIV/AIDS, Sexually transmissible infections, issues of sexuality and relevant areas of reproductive health. This journal is directed towards those working in sexual health as clinicians, public health practitioners, researchers in behavioural, clinical, laboratory, public health or social, sciences. The journal publishes peer reviewed original research, editorials, review articles, topical debates, case reports and critical correspondence. Officially sponsored by: The Australasian Chapter of Sexual Health Medicine of RACP Sexual Health Society of Queensland Sexual Health is the official journal of the International Union against Sexually Transmitted Infections (IUSTI), Asia-Pacific, and the Asia-Oceania Federation of Sexology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信