疫苗不平等给我们的启示:从理想和非理想理论的角度看前进的道路。

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Global Bioethics Pub Date : 2025-05-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/11287462.2025.2497602
Florencia Luna, Felicitas Holzer
{"title":"疫苗不平等给我们的启示:从理想和非理想理论的角度看前进的道路。","authors":"Florencia Luna, Felicitas Holzer","doi":"10.1080/11287462.2025.2497602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The equitable distribution of vaccines has emerged as a major issue in pandemic treaty negotiations following the COVID-19 pandemic. Failures in global procurement and distribution have been attributed to ineffective allocation mechanisms and a general lack of cooperation. More than four years after the onset of the pandemic, this article presents a perspective on how to achieve a more equitable global allocation of medical supplies for future pandemics, drawing on the distinction between \"ideal\" and \"non-ideal\" schemes of cooperation. We will consider two perspectives: first, improving solutions under current, non-ideal circumstances where non-cooperation dominates in the short and medium term, given the challenges of an uncooperative international landscape; and second, implementing long-term policies that aim at ideal proposals, assuming an increased level of cooperation in the future. This evaluation will address the past successes and shortcomings of the COVAX facility, and also the negotiations on a pandemic treaty led by the World Health Organizations, to better address future pandemics. We will discuss key issues that ought to be of central concern when moving towards more cooperative solutions in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":36835,"journal":{"name":"Global Bioethics","volume":"36 1","pages":"2497602"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064108/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What vaccine inequity has taught us: a way forward through the lens of ideal and non-ideal theory.\",\"authors\":\"Florencia Luna, Felicitas Holzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/11287462.2025.2497602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The equitable distribution of vaccines has emerged as a major issue in pandemic treaty negotiations following the COVID-19 pandemic. Failures in global procurement and distribution have been attributed to ineffective allocation mechanisms and a general lack of cooperation. More than four years after the onset of the pandemic, this article presents a perspective on how to achieve a more equitable global allocation of medical supplies for future pandemics, drawing on the distinction between \\\"ideal\\\" and \\\"non-ideal\\\" schemes of cooperation. We will consider two perspectives: first, improving solutions under current, non-ideal circumstances where non-cooperation dominates in the short and medium term, given the challenges of an uncooperative international landscape; and second, implementing long-term policies that aim at ideal proposals, assuming an increased level of cooperation in the future. This evaluation will address the past successes and shortcomings of the COVAX facility, and also the negotiations on a pandemic treaty led by the World Health Organizations, to better address future pandemics. We will discuss key issues that ought to be of central concern when moving towards more cooperative solutions in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Bioethics\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"2497602\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064108/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Bioethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2025.2497602\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2025.2497602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2019冠状病毒病大流行之后,公平分配疫苗已成为大流行条约谈判中的一个主要问题。全球采购和分配失败的原因是分配机制无效和普遍缺乏合作。在大流行爆发四年多后,本文根据“理想”和“非理想”合作计划之间的区别,提出了一个关于如何实现更公平的全球医疗用品分配以应对未来大流行的观点。我们将考虑两个方面:首先,考虑到不合作的国际格局所带来的挑战,在当前不合作占主导地位的短期和中期非理想情况下,改进解决方案;第二,实施以理想提案为目标的长期政策,假设未来合作水平提高。这次评估将讨论全球获取疫苗机制过去的成功和不足,以及由世界卫生组织领导的关于大流行病条约的谈判,以便更好地应对未来的大流行病。我们将讨论在今后走向更加合作的解决办法时应当成为中心关注的关键问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What vaccine inequity has taught us: a way forward through the lens of ideal and non-ideal theory.

The equitable distribution of vaccines has emerged as a major issue in pandemic treaty negotiations following the COVID-19 pandemic. Failures in global procurement and distribution have been attributed to ineffective allocation mechanisms and a general lack of cooperation. More than four years after the onset of the pandemic, this article presents a perspective on how to achieve a more equitable global allocation of medical supplies for future pandemics, drawing on the distinction between "ideal" and "non-ideal" schemes of cooperation. We will consider two perspectives: first, improving solutions under current, non-ideal circumstances where non-cooperation dominates in the short and medium term, given the challenges of an uncooperative international landscape; and second, implementing long-term policies that aim at ideal proposals, assuming an increased level of cooperation in the future. This evaluation will address the past successes and shortcomings of the COVAX facility, and also the negotiations on a pandemic treaty led by the World Health Organizations, to better address future pandemics. We will discuss key issues that ought to be of central concern when moving towards more cooperative solutions in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Bioethics
Global Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信