Xiaoxiao Hu, Yang Li, Hongwen Ma, Lina Xiong, Jiping Tan, Yanfei Jin
{"title":"中国癌症人群癌症患者健康行为量表的心理测量特征及测量不变性","authors":"Xiaoxiao Hu, Yang Li, Hongwen Ma, Lina Xiong, Jiping Tan, Yanfei Jin","doi":"10.1186/s12955-025-02368-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health behavior plays a major role in the development, progression, and prognosis of cancer. The Health Behavior Scale for Cancer Patients (HBSCP) can be used to assess the level of health behavior in cancer patients. This study aimed to explore its psychometric properties and Measurement Invariance (MI) in the Chinese cancer population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal study was conducted with 567 cancer patients across two hospitals, and 428 participants underwent a second assessment three months later. Analyses were performed to evaluate reliability (internal consistency), validity (structural validity, convergent validity, and criterion-related validity), and MI of the Chinese version of the HBSCP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two-factor structural model of the 9-item scale demonstrated an excellent fit in Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Psychometric analyses indicated strong internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from 0.846 to 0.899 and McDonald's Omega values between 0.847 and 0.897. Convergent validity was supported by Composite Reliability (CR > 0.70) and Average Variance Extracted (AVE > 0.50). Criterion-related validity was established via significant correlations with the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II; r = 0.653 ~ 0.760). Multi-group CFA further confirmed MI across cancer types (ΔCFI&TLI < 0.01; ΔRMSEA < 0.015) and time groups (3-month interval).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides longitudinal evidence supporting the adequate psychometric properties and temporal stability of the Chinese version of the HBSCP, thus validating its utility for measuring health behavior in Chinese cancer populations. The Chinese HBSCP can serve as a tool for healthcare providers to assess the current status and changes in health behavior among cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12980,"journal":{"name":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","volume":"23 1","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12001631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the health behavior scale for cancer patients in Chinese cancer population.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoxiao Hu, Yang Li, Hongwen Ma, Lina Xiong, Jiping Tan, Yanfei Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12955-025-02368-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health behavior plays a major role in the development, progression, and prognosis of cancer. The Health Behavior Scale for Cancer Patients (HBSCP) can be used to assess the level of health behavior in cancer patients. This study aimed to explore its psychometric properties and Measurement Invariance (MI) in the Chinese cancer population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal study was conducted with 567 cancer patients across two hospitals, and 428 participants underwent a second assessment three months later. Analyses were performed to evaluate reliability (internal consistency), validity (structural validity, convergent validity, and criterion-related validity), and MI of the Chinese version of the HBSCP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two-factor structural model of the 9-item scale demonstrated an excellent fit in Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Psychometric analyses indicated strong internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from 0.846 to 0.899 and McDonald's Omega values between 0.847 and 0.897. Convergent validity was supported by Composite Reliability (CR > 0.70) and Average Variance Extracted (AVE > 0.50). Criterion-related validity was established via significant correlations with the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II; r = 0.653 ~ 0.760). Multi-group CFA further confirmed MI across cancer types (ΔCFI&TLI < 0.01; ΔRMSEA < 0.015) and time groups (3-month interval).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides longitudinal evidence supporting the adequate psychometric properties and temporal stability of the Chinese version of the HBSCP, thus validating its utility for measuring health behavior in Chinese cancer populations. The Chinese HBSCP can serve as a tool for healthcare providers to assess the current status and changes in health behavior among cancer patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12001631/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-025-02368-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Quality of Life Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-025-02368-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the health behavior scale for cancer patients in Chinese cancer population.
Background: Health behavior plays a major role in the development, progression, and prognosis of cancer. The Health Behavior Scale for Cancer Patients (HBSCP) can be used to assess the level of health behavior in cancer patients. This study aimed to explore its psychometric properties and Measurement Invariance (MI) in the Chinese cancer population.
Methods: A longitudinal study was conducted with 567 cancer patients across two hospitals, and 428 participants underwent a second assessment three months later. Analyses were performed to evaluate reliability (internal consistency), validity (structural validity, convergent validity, and criterion-related validity), and MI of the Chinese version of the HBSCP.
Results: The two-factor structural model of the 9-item scale demonstrated an excellent fit in Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Psychometric analyses indicated strong internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from 0.846 to 0.899 and McDonald's Omega values between 0.847 and 0.897. Convergent validity was supported by Composite Reliability (CR > 0.70) and Average Variance Extracted (AVE > 0.50). Criterion-related validity was established via significant correlations with the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP-II; r = 0.653 ~ 0.760). Multi-group CFA further confirmed MI across cancer types (ΔCFI&TLI < 0.01; ΔRMSEA < 0.015) and time groups (3-month interval).
Conclusions: This study provides longitudinal evidence supporting the adequate psychometric properties and temporal stability of the Chinese version of the HBSCP, thus validating its utility for measuring health behavior in Chinese cancer populations. The Chinese HBSCP can serve as a tool for healthcare providers to assess the current status and changes in health behavior among cancer patients.
期刊介绍:
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes is an open access, peer-reviewed, journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain.
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes considers original manuscripts on the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) assessment for evaluation of medical and psychosocial interventions. It also considers approaches and studies on psychometric properties of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures, including cultural validation of instruments if they provide information about the impact of interventions. The journal publishes study protocols and reviews summarising the present state of knowledge concerning a particular aspect of HRQOL and patient reported outcome measures. Reviews should generally follow systematic review methodology. Comments on articles and letters to the editor are welcome.