混合hyrax面罩与mentoplate对生长中的III类患者的长期三维骨骼影响:一项随机对照试验。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 Dentistry
Joeri Meyns, Jindanil Thanatchaporn, Sohaib Shujaat, Constantinus Politis, Reinhilde Jacobs
{"title":"混合hyrax面罩与mentoplate对生长中的III类患者的长期三维骨骼影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Joeri Meyns, Jindanil Thanatchaporn, Sohaib Shujaat, Constantinus Politis, Reinhilde Jacobs","doi":"10.1186/s40510-025-00561-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early intervention in Class III malocclusion aims to prevent the need for surgery in adulthood by enhancing upper jaw growth while limiting lower jaw development. Although traditional facemask treatment remain common, bone-anchored devices are increasingly used, claiming better skeletal control and patient compliance. However, strong evidence supporting these advantages is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation ratio.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong> 28 growing Class III patients (mean age 9.7 ± 1.3 years) in mixed dentition with skeletal class III malocclusion.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong> Patients were randomly assigned to either hybrid hyrax with facemask (HH + FM, n = 14) or hybrid hyrax with mentoplate (HH + MP, n = 14). All received Alt-RAMEC protocol expansion. FM group used 360-400 g/side elastic traction 12-14 h daily; MP group used 185 g/side continuous traction.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong> To compare 5-year three-dimensional (3D) skeletal effects between HH + FM and HH + MP protocols.</p><p><strong>Outcome: </strong> Primary outcome was 3D volumetric changes of upper and lower jaw at 1 year (T1) and 5 years (T2) post-treatment, measured using low-dose CT scans.</p><p><strong>Randomization: </strong>28 patients were allocated to either treatment-protocols using sequentially numbered opaque, sealed envelopes. The randomization sequence was generated with a 1:1 allocation ratio.</p><p><strong>Blinding: </strong>Due to the nature of the trial, the operator and children could not be blinded to the treatment allocation. However, blinding was used when assessing the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Follow-up: one patient was lost at the one-year follow-up and an additional three patients were lost at the 5-year-follow-up.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>At T2 (5 years), maxillary advancement was identical between both groups (0.85 mm ± 0.5). Mandibular growth control showed minimal difference (FM: - 0.01 mm ± 0.24; MP: 0.10 mm ± 0.33). No significant differences were found between groups for any skeletal measurements (p > 0.05). Male patients showed lager mandibular changes both signed (p < 0.03) and unsigned (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Harms: </strong>minor harms were encountered with the anchor hooks (fracture or mucosal irritation), however none led to treatment cessation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both protocols demonstrated comparable long-term skeletal effects in Class III correction. Treatment choice should be based on individual patient factors rather than assumed mechanical advantages.</p>","PeriodicalId":56071,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Orthodontics","volume":"26 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12009789/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term three-dimensional skeletal effects of hybrid hyrax with facemask versus mentoplate in growing Class III patients: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Joeri Meyns, Jindanil Thanatchaporn, Sohaib Shujaat, Constantinus Politis, Reinhilde Jacobs\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40510-025-00561-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early intervention in Class III malocclusion aims to prevent the need for surgery in adulthood by enhancing upper jaw growth while limiting lower jaw development. Although traditional facemask treatment remain common, bone-anchored devices are increasingly used, claiming better skeletal control and patient compliance. However, strong evidence supporting these advantages is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation ratio.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong> 28 growing Class III patients (mean age 9.7 ± 1.3 years) in mixed dentition with skeletal class III malocclusion.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong> Patients were randomly assigned to either hybrid hyrax with facemask (HH + FM, n = 14) or hybrid hyrax with mentoplate (HH + MP, n = 14). All received Alt-RAMEC protocol expansion. FM group used 360-400 g/side elastic traction 12-14 h daily; MP group used 185 g/side continuous traction.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong> To compare 5-year three-dimensional (3D) skeletal effects between HH + FM and HH + MP protocols.</p><p><strong>Outcome: </strong> Primary outcome was 3D volumetric changes of upper and lower jaw at 1 year (T1) and 5 years (T2) post-treatment, measured using low-dose CT scans.</p><p><strong>Randomization: </strong>28 patients were allocated to either treatment-protocols using sequentially numbered opaque, sealed envelopes. The randomization sequence was generated with a 1:1 allocation ratio.</p><p><strong>Blinding: </strong>Due to the nature of the trial, the operator and children could not be blinded to the treatment allocation. However, blinding was used when assessing the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Follow-up: one patient was lost at the one-year follow-up and an additional three patients were lost at the 5-year-follow-up.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>At T2 (5 years), maxillary advancement was identical between both groups (0.85 mm ± 0.5). Mandibular growth control showed minimal difference (FM: - 0.01 mm ± 0.24; MP: 0.10 mm ± 0.33). No significant differences were found between groups for any skeletal measurements (p > 0.05). Male patients showed lager mandibular changes both signed (p < 0.03) and unsigned (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Harms: </strong>minor harms were encountered with the anchor hooks (fracture or mucosal irritation), however none led to treatment cessation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both protocols demonstrated comparable long-term skeletal effects in Class III correction. Treatment choice should be based on individual patient factors rather than assumed mechanical advantages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12009789/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-025-00561-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-025-00561-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早期干预III类错牙合的目的是通过促进上颌生长,限制下颌发育,以防止成年后需要手术。尽管传统的面罩治疗仍然很常见,骨锚定装置越来越多地使用,声称更好的骨骼控制和患者依从性。然而,支持这些优势的有力证据是有限的。方法:单中心、平行组、随机对照试验,比例为1:1。参与者:28例生长III类患者(平均年龄9.7±1.3岁),混合牙列伴骨骼III类错牙合。干预措施:患者被随机分配到混合面罩hyrax组(HH + FM, n = 14)或混合面罩hyrax组(HH + MP, n = 14)。均接受Alt-RAMEC协议扩展。FM组采用360 ~ 400 g/侧弹性牵引,每天12 ~ 14 h;MP组采用185 g/侧连续牵引。目的:比较HH + FM和HH + MP方案5年三维骨骼效果。结果:主要结果是治疗后1年(T1)和5年(T2)上颌和下颌的三维体积变化,使用低剂量CT扫描测量。随机化:28名患者被分配到使用顺序编号的不透明密封信封的两种治疗方案中。随机化序列按1:1的分配比例生成。盲法:由于试验的性质,操作者和儿童不能对治疗分配盲法。然而,在评估结果时使用了盲法。结果:随访:1年随访丢失1例,5年随访丢失3例。结果:在T2(5年)时,两组上颌前移相同(0.85 mm±0.5)。下颌生长控制差异极小(FM: - 0.01 mm±0.24;MP: 0.10 mm±0.33)。各组间骨骼测量均无显著差异(p < 0.05)。男性患者表现出更大的下颌变化,这两种变化都有明显的危害:锚钩会造成轻微的伤害(骨折或粘膜刺激),但没有导致治疗停止。结论:两种方案在III类矫正中表现出相当的长期骨骼效果。治疗选择应基于个体患者的因素,而不是假设的机械优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term three-dimensional skeletal effects of hybrid hyrax with facemask versus mentoplate in growing Class III patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Early intervention in Class III malocclusion aims to prevent the need for surgery in adulthood by enhancing upper jaw growth while limiting lower jaw development. Although traditional facemask treatment remain common, bone-anchored devices are increasingly used, claiming better skeletal control and patient compliance. However, strong evidence supporting these advantages is limited.

Methods: Single-center, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation ratio.

Participants:  28 growing Class III patients (mean age 9.7 ± 1.3 years) in mixed dentition with skeletal class III malocclusion.

Interventions:  Patients were randomly assigned to either hybrid hyrax with facemask (HH + FM, n = 14) or hybrid hyrax with mentoplate (HH + MP, n = 14). All received Alt-RAMEC protocol expansion. FM group used 360-400 g/side elastic traction 12-14 h daily; MP group used 185 g/side continuous traction.

Objective:  To compare 5-year three-dimensional (3D) skeletal effects between HH + FM and HH + MP protocols.

Outcome:  Primary outcome was 3D volumetric changes of upper and lower jaw at 1 year (T1) and 5 years (T2) post-treatment, measured using low-dose CT scans.

Randomization: 28 patients were allocated to either treatment-protocols using sequentially numbered opaque, sealed envelopes. The randomization sequence was generated with a 1:1 allocation ratio.

Blinding: Due to the nature of the trial, the operator and children could not be blinded to the treatment allocation. However, blinding was used when assessing the outcomes.

Results: Follow-up: one patient was lost at the one-year follow-up and an additional three patients were lost at the 5-year-follow-up.

Outcomes: At T2 (5 years), maxillary advancement was identical between both groups (0.85 mm ± 0.5). Mandibular growth control showed minimal difference (FM: - 0.01 mm ± 0.24; MP: 0.10 mm ± 0.33). No significant differences were found between groups for any skeletal measurements (p > 0.05). Male patients showed lager mandibular changes both signed (p < 0.03) and unsigned (p < 0.01).

Harms: minor harms were encountered with the anchor hooks (fracture or mucosal irritation), however none led to treatment cessation.

Conclusions: Both protocols demonstrated comparable long-term skeletal effects in Class III correction. Treatment choice should be based on individual patient factors rather than assumed mechanical advantages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Orthodontics
Progress in Orthodontics Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
45
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Orthodontics is a fully open access, international journal owned by the Italian Society of Orthodontics and published under the brand SpringerOpen. The Society is currently covering all publication costs so there are no article processing charges for authors. It is a premier journal of international scope that fosters orthodontic research, including both basic research and development of innovative clinical techniques, with an emphasis on the following areas: • Mechanisms to improve orthodontics • Clinical studies and control animal studies • Orthodontics and genetics, genomics • Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) control clinical trials • Efficacy of orthodontic appliances and animal models • Systematic reviews and meta analyses • Mechanisms to speed orthodontic treatment Progress in Orthodontics will consider for publication only meritorious and original contributions. These may be: • Original articles reporting the findings of clinical trials, clinically relevant basic scientific investigations, or novel therapeutic or diagnostic systems • Review articles on current topics • Articles on novel techniques and clinical tools • Articles of contemporary interest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信