利用综合卫生系统专业药房模型的儿科和青少年丙型肝炎护理级联和现实世界治疗结果。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Alicia B Carver, Cori Edmonds, Kristen Whelchel, Ryan Moore, Leena Choi, Lynette A Gillis
{"title":"利用综合卫生系统专业药房模型的儿科和青少年丙型肝炎护理级联和现实世界治疗结果。","authors":"Alicia B Carver, Cori Edmonds, Kristen Whelchel, Ryan Moore, Leena Choi, Lynette A Gillis","doi":"10.1093/jpids/piaf042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the cascade of care (CoC) and real-world efficacy of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for hepatitis C treatment in pediatric and adolescent patients utilizing an integrated health system specialty pharmacy (HSSP) to assist with medication selection, insurance approval, swallowing practice, initiation, and monitoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study included chronic hepatitis C patients <18 years old evaluated by pediatric hepatologists at an academic health system between 1/1/2017 and 9/30/2022. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response (SVR) ≥12 weeks following treatment completion in patients initiating DAAs. Secondary endpoints were CoC advancement, variables impacting DAA initiation, patient-reported side effects, and adherence. An ordinal logistic regression model assessed whether initiation time was associated with a patient's ability to swallow, prior authorization outcome, and medication availability to HSSP at referral. The odds ratio reflects the likelihood of a shift in time to initiation for a given group relative to its respective reference group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 98 patients evaluated by a hepatologist, 73 (75%) were referred to the HSSP. Loss to follow-up was the primary reason (88%; 22/25) for non-referral, most commonly (73%; 16/22) in those aged ≤5 years. Following HSSP referral, 88% (64/73) initiated DAA and 92% (59/64) of those achieved SVR. Time from HSSP referral to medication initiation was impacted by DAA availability [OR=41.47; 95% CI: 9.51, 180.87; p<0.001] and inability to swallow the dosage form at evaluation [OR=3.94; 95% CI: 1.56, 9.98; p=0.004]. Over half (53%; 34/64) of patients initiating DAA reported ≥1 adverse event; none discontinued treatment. Most (69%; 44/64) reported no missed doses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The largest CoC drop-off occurred following initial clinic evaluation, primarily in children ≤5 years. Enhanced linkage to care efforts are needed in these patients. Conversely, nearly all patients referred to the HSSP were initiated on DAA, completed therapy, and achieved SVR.</p>","PeriodicalId":17374,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pediatric and Adolescent Hepatitis C Care Cascade and Real-World Treatment Outcomes Utilizing an Integrated Health System Specialty Pharmacy Model.\",\"authors\":\"Alicia B Carver, Cori Edmonds, Kristen Whelchel, Ryan Moore, Leena Choi, Lynette A Gillis\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jpids/piaf042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study evaluated the cascade of care (CoC) and real-world efficacy of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for hepatitis C treatment in pediatric and adolescent patients utilizing an integrated health system specialty pharmacy (HSSP) to assist with medication selection, insurance approval, swallowing practice, initiation, and monitoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study included chronic hepatitis C patients <18 years old evaluated by pediatric hepatologists at an academic health system between 1/1/2017 and 9/30/2022. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response (SVR) ≥12 weeks following treatment completion in patients initiating DAAs. Secondary endpoints were CoC advancement, variables impacting DAA initiation, patient-reported side effects, and adherence. An ordinal logistic regression model assessed whether initiation time was associated with a patient's ability to swallow, prior authorization outcome, and medication availability to HSSP at referral. The odds ratio reflects the likelihood of a shift in time to initiation for a given group relative to its respective reference group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 98 patients evaluated by a hepatologist, 73 (75%) were referred to the HSSP. Loss to follow-up was the primary reason (88%; 22/25) for non-referral, most commonly (73%; 16/22) in those aged ≤5 years. Following HSSP referral, 88% (64/73) initiated DAA and 92% (59/64) of those achieved SVR. Time from HSSP referral to medication initiation was impacted by DAA availability [OR=41.47; 95% CI: 9.51, 180.87; p<0.001] and inability to swallow the dosage form at evaluation [OR=3.94; 95% CI: 1.56, 9.98; p=0.004]. Over half (53%; 34/64) of patients initiating DAA reported ≥1 adverse event; none discontinued treatment. Most (69%; 44/64) reported no missed doses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The largest CoC drop-off occurred following initial clinic evaluation, primarily in children ≤5 years. Enhanced linkage to care efforts are needed in these patients. Conversely, nearly all patients referred to the HSSP were initiated on DAA, completed therapy, and achieved SVR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpids/piaf042\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpids/piaf042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究评估了直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)在儿科和青少年丙型肝炎患者治疗中的级联治疗(CoC)和实际疗效,利用综合卫生系统专业药房(HSSP)协助药物选择、保险批准、吞咽练习、起始治疗和监测。方法:这项单中心、回顾性、观察性队列研究纳入了慢性丙型肝炎患者。结果:在肝病学家评估的98例患者中,73例(75%)被转诊到HSSP。失去随访是主要原因(88%;22/25),最常见的是不转诊(73%;16/22)。在HSSP转诊后,88%(64/73)的患者开始DAA治疗,92%(59/64)的患者达到SVR。从HSSP转诊到开始用药的时间受到DAA可用性的影响[OR=41.47;95% ci: 9.51, 180.87;结论:CoC的最大下降发生在最初的临床评估之后,主要发生在≤5岁的儿童中。这些患者需要加强与护理工作的联系。相反,几乎所有接受HSSP治疗的患者都开始接受DAA治疗,完成治疗并达到SVR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pediatric and Adolescent Hepatitis C Care Cascade and Real-World Treatment Outcomes Utilizing an Integrated Health System Specialty Pharmacy Model.

Objectives: This study evaluated the cascade of care (CoC) and real-world efficacy of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for hepatitis C treatment in pediatric and adolescent patients utilizing an integrated health system specialty pharmacy (HSSP) to assist with medication selection, insurance approval, swallowing practice, initiation, and monitoring.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study included chronic hepatitis C patients <18 years old evaluated by pediatric hepatologists at an academic health system between 1/1/2017 and 9/30/2022. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response (SVR) ≥12 weeks following treatment completion in patients initiating DAAs. Secondary endpoints were CoC advancement, variables impacting DAA initiation, patient-reported side effects, and adherence. An ordinal logistic regression model assessed whether initiation time was associated with a patient's ability to swallow, prior authorization outcome, and medication availability to HSSP at referral. The odds ratio reflects the likelihood of a shift in time to initiation for a given group relative to its respective reference group.

Results: Of 98 patients evaluated by a hepatologist, 73 (75%) were referred to the HSSP. Loss to follow-up was the primary reason (88%; 22/25) for non-referral, most commonly (73%; 16/22) in those aged ≤5 years. Following HSSP referral, 88% (64/73) initiated DAA and 92% (59/64) of those achieved SVR. Time from HSSP referral to medication initiation was impacted by DAA availability [OR=41.47; 95% CI: 9.51, 180.87; p<0.001] and inability to swallow the dosage form at evaluation [OR=3.94; 95% CI: 1.56, 9.98; p=0.004]. Over half (53%; 34/64) of patients initiating DAA reported ≥1 adverse event; none discontinued treatment. Most (69%; 44/64) reported no missed doses.

Conclusion: The largest CoC drop-off occurred following initial clinic evaluation, primarily in children ≤5 years. Enhanced linkage to care efforts are needed in these patients. Conversely, nearly all patients referred to the HSSP were initiated on DAA, completed therapy, and achieved SVR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society
Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
179
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (JPIDS), the official journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, is dedicated to perinatal, childhood, and adolescent infectious diseases. The journal is a high-quality source of original research articles, clinical trial reports, guidelines, and topical reviews, with particular attention to the interests and needs of the global pediatric infectious diseases communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信