{"title":"对“从遗留资源中溶解P动员的概念模型”的勘误。","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.70030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nash, D. M., Mc Dowell, R.W., Kleinman, P. J. A., Moore, P. A., Duncan, J. M., Haygarth, P. M., Smith, D. R., & Iho, A. (2025). A conceptual model for dissolved P mobilization from legacy sources. <i>Journal of Environmental Quality, 54</i>, 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.70003</p><p>The section 3 heading “Phosphorus Indices and Assessing the Risk of Phopsphorus Exports” has a spelling error. The heading should have read “Phosphorus Indices and Assessing the Risk of Phosphorus Exports.” In the fifth paragraph under this heading (and in the corresponding reference in the reference list), the reference “U.S. Department of Agriculture—National Nesource Conservation Service, 2012” should have read “U.S. Department of Agriculture—National Resource Conservation Service, 2012.” In the reference list, there are two spelling errors: in the Greenwood and McKenzie (2001) reference, “properries” should be “properties” and in the Vaze et al. (2011) reference, “Capitalm” should be “Capital.”</p><p>We apologize for these errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":15732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental quality","volume":"54 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeq2.70030","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Erratum to “A conceptual model for dissolved P mobilization from legacy sources”\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jeq2.70030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Nash, D. M., Mc Dowell, R.W., Kleinman, P. J. A., Moore, P. A., Duncan, J. M., Haygarth, P. M., Smith, D. R., & Iho, A. (2025). A conceptual model for dissolved P mobilization from legacy sources. <i>Journal of Environmental Quality, 54</i>, 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.70003</p><p>The section 3 heading “Phosphorus Indices and Assessing the Risk of Phopsphorus Exports” has a spelling error. The heading should have read “Phosphorus Indices and Assessing the Risk of Phosphorus Exports.” In the fifth paragraph under this heading (and in the corresponding reference in the reference list), the reference “U.S. Department of Agriculture—National Nesource Conservation Service, 2012” should have read “U.S. Department of Agriculture—National Resource Conservation Service, 2012.” In the reference list, there are two spelling errors: in the Greenwood and McKenzie (2001) reference, “properries” should be “properties” and in the Vaze et al. (2011) reference, “Capitalm” should be “Capital.”</p><p>We apologize for these errors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of environmental quality\",\"volume\":\"54 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeq2.70030\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of environmental quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeq2.70030\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental quality","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeq2.70030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
纳什,D. M,麦克道尔,R. w .,克莱曼,P. J. A.,摩尔,P. A.,邓肯,J. M.,海加斯,P. M.,史密斯,D. R.,和Iho, A.(2025)。从遗留资源中动员溶解磷的概念模型。环境科学学报,2004,26(4):393 - 398。https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.70003The第三节标题“磷指数和磷出口风险评估”有一个拼写错误。标题应该是“磷指数与磷出口风险评估”。在本标题下的第5段(以及参考文献清单中相应的参考文献)中,“美国农业部-国家资源保护局,2012年“应该读成”美国农业部-国家资源保护局,2012。在参考文献列表中,有两个拼写错误:在Greenwood和McKenzie(2001)的参考文献中,“properties”应该是“properties”,在Vaze et al.(2011)的参考文献中,“Capitalm”应该是“Capital”。我们为这些错误道歉。
Erratum to “A conceptual model for dissolved P mobilization from legacy sources”
Nash, D. M., Mc Dowell, R.W., Kleinman, P. J. A., Moore, P. A., Duncan, J. M., Haygarth, P. M., Smith, D. R., & Iho, A. (2025). A conceptual model for dissolved P mobilization from legacy sources. Journal of Environmental Quality, 54, 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.70003
The section 3 heading “Phosphorus Indices and Assessing the Risk of Phopsphorus Exports” has a spelling error. The heading should have read “Phosphorus Indices and Assessing the Risk of Phosphorus Exports.” In the fifth paragraph under this heading (and in the corresponding reference in the reference list), the reference “U.S. Department of Agriculture—National Nesource Conservation Service, 2012” should have read “U.S. Department of Agriculture—National Resource Conservation Service, 2012.” In the reference list, there are two spelling errors: in the Greenwood and McKenzie (2001) reference, “properries” should be “properties” and in the Vaze et al. (2011) reference, “Capitalm” should be “Capital.”
期刊介绍:
Articles in JEQ cover various aspects of anthropogenic impacts on the environment, including agricultural, terrestrial, atmospheric, and aquatic systems, with emphasis on the understanding of underlying processes. To be acceptable for consideration in JEQ, a manuscript must make a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge or toward a better understanding of existing concepts. The study should define principles of broad applicability, be related to problems over a sizable geographic area, or be of potential interest to a representative number of scientists. Emphasis is given to the understanding of underlying processes rather than to monitoring.
Contributions are accepted from all disciplines for consideration by the editorial board. Manuscripts may be volunteered, invited, or coordinated as a special section or symposium.