Yunpeng Li, Shimin Tan, Xindi Wang, Nan Li, Yimeng Fan, Zhao Liu, Shengjian Mi
{"title":"SMILE中角膜中央间质厚度减少少于计划:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Yunpeng Li, Shimin Tan, Xindi Wang, Nan Li, Yimeng Fan, Zhao Liu, Shengjian Mi","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20250409-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the differences between the planned and achieved central corneal thickness (CT) reduction after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 426 eyes (426 patients) treated with SMILE. The central CT and corneal epithelial thickness (CET) were measured using the RTVue XR 100 optical coherence tomography device preoperatively and more than 6 months postoperatively. The central corneal stromal thickness (CST) was obtained by central (CT - CET). The planned and achieved thickness reductions were compared and the difference was defined as the planned-achieved difference (PAD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The achieved central CT reduction was 75.80 ± 16.24 µm, which was smaller than the planned (100.20 ± 20.46 µm, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Similarly, the central CST reduction, which excluded the influence of corneal epithelial proliferation, was overestimated by 19.91 ± 6.53 µm. Furthermore, the PAD of central CST reduction showed a positive correlation with preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) and with planned central CST reduction (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.906, <i>P</i> < .001). However, the PAD of central CST reduction did not influence postoperative visual acuity. When removing the nomogram adjustment, the overall overestimation of central CST reduction was narrowed to 12.09 ± 8.09 µm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Over 6 months postoperatively, the achieved central CT reduction after SMILE was less than the planned reduction. The difference was due to the overestimation of CST reduction, rather than corneal epithelial proliferation. Moreover, there was a greater disparity between the planned and achieved central CST reduction with higher MRSE, attesting to the safety of SMILE for patients with relatively high MRSE. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(5):e501-e509.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 5","pages":"e501-e509"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Achieved Central Corneal Stromal Thickness Reduction Less Than the Planned in SMILE: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yunpeng Li, Shimin Tan, Xindi Wang, Nan Li, Yimeng Fan, Zhao Liu, Shengjian Mi\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/1081597X-20250409-02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the differences between the planned and achieved central corneal thickness (CT) reduction after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 426 eyes (426 patients) treated with SMILE. The central CT and corneal epithelial thickness (CET) were measured using the RTVue XR 100 optical coherence tomography device preoperatively and more than 6 months postoperatively. The central corneal stromal thickness (CST) was obtained by central (CT - CET). The planned and achieved thickness reductions were compared and the difference was defined as the planned-achieved difference (PAD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The achieved central CT reduction was 75.80 ± 16.24 µm, which was smaller than the planned (100.20 ± 20.46 µm, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Similarly, the central CST reduction, which excluded the influence of corneal epithelial proliferation, was overestimated by 19.91 ± 6.53 µm. Furthermore, the PAD of central CST reduction showed a positive correlation with preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) and with planned central CST reduction (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.906, <i>P</i> < .001). However, the PAD of central CST reduction did not influence postoperative visual acuity. When removing the nomogram adjustment, the overall overestimation of central CST reduction was narrowed to 12.09 ± 8.09 µm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Over 6 months postoperatively, the achieved central CT reduction after SMILE was less than the planned reduction. The difference was due to the overestimation of CST reduction, rather than corneal epithelial proliferation. Moreover, there was a greater disparity between the planned and achieved central CST reduction with higher MRSE, attesting to the safety of SMILE for patients with relatively high MRSE. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(5):e501-e509.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\"41 5\",\"pages\":\"e501-e509\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250409-02\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250409-02","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评价小切口晶状体摘出术(SMILE)后计划与实际角膜中央厚度降低(CT)的差异。方法:采用SMILE治疗426只眼(426例患者)进行回顾性研究。术前和术后6个多月采用RTVue XR 100光学相干断层扫描仪测量中央CT和角膜上皮厚度(CET)。中央(CT - CET)测量角膜中央间质厚度(CST)。将计划和实现的厚度减少量进行比较,并将差异定义为计划实现差异(PAD)。结果:实现的中央CT缩小幅度为75.80±16.24µm,小于计划的100.20±20.46µm, P < 0.001)。同样,排除角膜上皮增生影响的中央CST降低值被高估了19.91±6.53µm。此外,中央CST复位的PAD与术前明显折射球当量(MRSE)和计划中央CST复位呈正相关(R2 = 0.906, P < 0.001)。然而,中央CST复位的PAD不影响术后视力。当剔除nomogram adjustment时,中央CST降低的总体高估值被缩小到12.09±8.09µm。结论:术后6个多月,SMILE术后中央CT复位低于计划复位。这种差异是由于高估了CST的减少,而不是角膜上皮的增殖。此外,在MRSE较高的患者中,计划和实现的中央CST降低之间存在更大的差异,证明SMILE对于MRSE相对较高的患者是安全的。[J].中华眼科杂志,2015;41(5):591 - 591。
The Achieved Central Corneal Stromal Thickness Reduction Less Than the Planned in SMILE: A Retrospective Study.
Purpose: To evaluate the differences between the planned and achieved central corneal thickness (CT) reduction after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
Methods: This retrospective study included 426 eyes (426 patients) treated with SMILE. The central CT and corneal epithelial thickness (CET) were measured using the RTVue XR 100 optical coherence tomography device preoperatively and more than 6 months postoperatively. The central corneal stromal thickness (CST) was obtained by central (CT - CET). The planned and achieved thickness reductions were compared and the difference was defined as the planned-achieved difference (PAD).
Results: The achieved central CT reduction was 75.80 ± 16.24 µm, which was smaller than the planned (100.20 ± 20.46 µm, P < 0.001). Similarly, the central CST reduction, which excluded the influence of corneal epithelial proliferation, was overestimated by 19.91 ± 6.53 µm. Furthermore, the PAD of central CST reduction showed a positive correlation with preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) and with planned central CST reduction (R2 = 0.906, P < .001). However, the PAD of central CST reduction did not influence postoperative visual acuity. When removing the nomogram adjustment, the overall overestimation of central CST reduction was narrowed to 12.09 ± 8.09 µm.
Conclusions: Over 6 months postoperatively, the achieved central CT reduction after SMILE was less than the planned reduction. The difference was due to the overestimation of CST reduction, rather than corneal epithelial proliferation. Moreover, there was a greater disparity between the planned and achieved central CST reduction with higher MRSE, attesting to the safety of SMILE for patients with relatively high MRSE. [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(5):e501-e509.].
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as:
• Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics”
• Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles
• Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content
• Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.