刺激前负性和P3反映了主要和次要任务之间的相对注意力分配量。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuroreport Pub Date : 2025-05-14 Epub Date: 2025-04-11 DOI:10.1097/WNR.0000000000002165
Yasunori Kotani, Atsushi Horai, Yoshimi Ohgami, Lucian Gheorghe
{"title":"刺激前负性和P3反映了主要和次要任务之间的相对注意力分配量。","authors":"Yasunori Kotani, Atsushi Horai, Yoshimi Ohgami, Lucian Gheorghe","doi":"10.1097/WNR.0000000000002165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined event-related potentials, particularly P3, in two attention states: a 'focused attention state', wherein attention was fully allocated to a primary task, and a 'poor attention state', wherein attention was disrupted by a secondary task, to elucidate attention allocation mechanisms during multitasking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>P3 was recorded under two conditions. The focus condition (focused attention state) involved only the primary task. The split-attention condition (poor attention state) included both primary and secondary tasks. Stimulus-preceding negativity (SPN) evoked by the secondary task was also recorded in the split-attention condition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>P3 amplitude was significantly higher in the focus condition than in the split-attention condition. Importantly, a novel finding revealed a negative correlation between SPN amplitude for the secondary task and P3 amplitude for the primary task, suggesting a trade-off in attention allocation. Source analysis of the P3 revealed that regions associated with attention shifting and inhibitory control were active during the focus condition. In contrast, regions linked to impaired cognitive-sensory integration and increased impulsivity were prominent during the split-attention condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights a new finding: SPN and P3 amplitudes are interrelated, reflecting relative attention allocation between tasks. In poor attention states, impaired attentional shifting and inhibitory control led to reduced P3 amplitude for the primary task and heightened SPN activity for the secondary task.</p>","PeriodicalId":19213,"journal":{"name":"Neuroreport","volume":" ","pages":"412-420"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12043257/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stimulus-preceding negativity and P3 reflecting relative amounts of attention allocation between primary and secondary tasks.\",\"authors\":\"Yasunori Kotani, Atsushi Horai, Yoshimi Ohgami, Lucian Gheorghe\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNR.0000000000002165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined event-related potentials, particularly P3, in two attention states: a 'focused attention state', wherein attention was fully allocated to a primary task, and a 'poor attention state', wherein attention was disrupted by a secondary task, to elucidate attention allocation mechanisms during multitasking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>P3 was recorded under two conditions. The focus condition (focused attention state) involved only the primary task. The split-attention condition (poor attention state) included both primary and secondary tasks. Stimulus-preceding negativity (SPN) evoked by the secondary task was also recorded in the split-attention condition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>P3 amplitude was significantly higher in the focus condition than in the split-attention condition. Importantly, a novel finding revealed a negative correlation between SPN amplitude for the secondary task and P3 amplitude for the primary task, suggesting a trade-off in attention allocation. Source analysis of the P3 revealed that regions associated with attention shifting and inhibitory control were active during the focus condition. In contrast, regions linked to impaired cognitive-sensory integration and increased impulsivity were prominent during the split-attention condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights a new finding: SPN and P3 amplitudes are interrelated, reflecting relative attention allocation between tasks. In poor attention states, impaired attentional shifting and inhibitory control led to reduced P3 amplitude for the primary task and heightened SPN activity for the secondary task.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroreport\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"412-420\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12043257/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroreport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000002165\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroreport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000002165","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究考察了两种注意状态下的事件相关电位,特别是P3,以阐明多任务处理过程中的注意分配机制。两种注意状态分别是:“注意力集中状态”(即注意力完全分配到主要任务上)和“注意力不集中状态”(即注意力被次要任务打断)。方法:在两种情况下记录P3。焦点条件(集中注意力状态)只涉及主要任务。注意力分散状态(注意力差状态)包括主要任务和次要任务。分散注意条件下,次要任务诱发的刺激前负性反应(SPN)也被记录下来。结果:P3振幅在集中状态下明显高于分散注意状态。重要的是,一项新的发现揭示了次要任务的SPN振幅与主要任务的P3振幅之间的负相关,这表明在注意力分配方面存在权衡。P3的来源分析显示,与注意力转移和抑制控制相关的区域在集中状态下是活跃的。相反,在注意力分散的情况下,与认知-感觉整合受损和冲动增加有关的区域非常突出。结论:本研究强调了一个新的发现:SPN和P3振幅是相互关联的,反映了任务之间的相对注意力分配。在注意力不佳状态下,注意转移和抑制控制受损导致主要任务的P3振幅降低,次要任务的SPN活性升高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stimulus-preceding negativity and P3 reflecting relative amounts of attention allocation between primary and secondary tasks.

Objective: This study examined event-related potentials, particularly P3, in two attention states: a 'focused attention state', wherein attention was fully allocated to a primary task, and a 'poor attention state', wherein attention was disrupted by a secondary task, to elucidate attention allocation mechanisms during multitasking.

Methods: P3 was recorded under two conditions. The focus condition (focused attention state) involved only the primary task. The split-attention condition (poor attention state) included both primary and secondary tasks. Stimulus-preceding negativity (SPN) evoked by the secondary task was also recorded in the split-attention condition.

Results: P3 amplitude was significantly higher in the focus condition than in the split-attention condition. Importantly, a novel finding revealed a negative correlation between SPN amplitude for the secondary task and P3 amplitude for the primary task, suggesting a trade-off in attention allocation. Source analysis of the P3 revealed that regions associated with attention shifting and inhibitory control were active during the focus condition. In contrast, regions linked to impaired cognitive-sensory integration and increased impulsivity were prominent during the split-attention condition.

Conclusion: This study highlights a new finding: SPN and P3 amplitudes are interrelated, reflecting relative attention allocation between tasks. In poor attention states, impaired attentional shifting and inhibitory control led to reduced P3 amplitude for the primary task and heightened SPN activity for the secondary task.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroreport
Neuroreport 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
150
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: NeuroReport is a channel for rapid communication of new findings in neuroscience. It is a forum for the publication of short but complete reports of important studies that require very fast publication. Papers are accepted on the basis of the novelty of their finding, on their significance for neuroscience and on a clear need for rapid publication. Preliminary communications are not suitable for the Journal. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. The core interest of the Journal is on studies that cast light on how the brain (and the whole of the nervous system) works. We aim to give authors a decision on their submission within 2-5 weeks, and all accepted articles appear in the next issue to press.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信