与缝合x线摄影相比,缝位扫描技术在全脊柱x线成像中具有相同的图像质量和减少的辐射暴露。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Hendrik Liebscher, Mechthild Scherzer, Christoph Meißner, Stefan Zwingenberger, Uwe Platz, Patricia Hahlbohm, Felix Schön, Jens-Peter Kühn, Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann, Sophia Freya Ulrike Blum
{"title":"与缝合x线摄影相比,缝位扫描技术在全脊柱x线成像中具有相同的图像质量和减少的辐射暴露。","authors":"Hendrik Liebscher, Mechthild Scherzer, Christoph Meißner, Stefan Zwingenberger, Uwe Platz, Patricia Hahlbohm, Felix Schön, Jens-Peter Kühn, Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann, Sophia Freya Ulrike Blum","doi":"10.1055/a-2564-0580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Repeated whole-spine imaging in children and adolescents with scoliosis causes significant cumulative radiation exposure. Low-dose slot-scanning imaging can reduce radiation exposure. The aim of this study was to compare whole-spine imaging using the slot-scanning technique (SST) with conventional stitched radiography (SR) with regard to image quality and radiation dose.We recruited 30 patients with a clinical indication for whole-spine imaging by SST, who had prior whole-spine imaging by SR available. 41 images acquired using both techniques were analyzed. The dose area product (DAP) and patient age, weight, height, and body-mass index were recorded. Image quality was assessed for 28 anatomical landmarks on a 4-point Likert scale by 4 raters. Group-wise comparisons were performed using paired t-tests. Interrater rating reliability was assessed using the interrater correlation coefficient.The mean DAP was significantly lower for SST than for SR (SST 8.0 ± 5.7 cGy · cm², SR 32.5 ± 34.5 cGy · cm², p < 0.001). The image quality was rated good for both modalities (means: SST 2.8 ± 0.6, SR 2.7 ± 0.5, p = 0.38). There was no significant difference in image quality ratings between both modalities. The inter-rater reliability was excellent with an inter-rater correlation coefficient of 0.86. Orthopedic surgeons rated the image quality of SST significantly better than that of SR.This study shows a significant reduction in radiation exposure for slot-scanning whole-spine imaging compared to stitched radiography with equal image quality, which facilitates the reduction of radiation exposure for repeated whole-spine imaging in children and adolescents to 25%. · Image quality is comparable between slot-scanning and stitched whole-spine imaging.. · The slot-scanning technique had a significantly lower dose area product compared with stitched radiographs.. · Orthopedic surgeons rated the image quality of slot-scanning significantly better than that of stitching.. · Radiation exposure in scoliosis whole-spine imaging can be reduced to 25%.. · Liebscher H, Scherzer M, Meißner C et al. Equal image quality and reduced radiation exposure in whole-spine X-ray imaging with slot-scanning technique compared with stitched radiography. Rofo 2025; DOI 10.1055/a-2564-0580.</p>","PeriodicalId":21490,"journal":{"name":"Rofo-fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgebenden Verfahren","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equal image quality and reduced radiation exposure in whole-spine X-ray imaging with slot-scanning technique compared with stitched radiography.\",\"authors\":\"Hendrik Liebscher, Mechthild Scherzer, Christoph Meißner, Stefan Zwingenberger, Uwe Platz, Patricia Hahlbohm, Felix Schön, Jens-Peter Kühn, Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann, Sophia Freya Ulrike Blum\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2564-0580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Repeated whole-spine imaging in children and adolescents with scoliosis causes significant cumulative radiation exposure. Low-dose slot-scanning imaging can reduce radiation exposure. The aim of this study was to compare whole-spine imaging using the slot-scanning technique (SST) with conventional stitched radiography (SR) with regard to image quality and radiation dose.We recruited 30 patients with a clinical indication for whole-spine imaging by SST, who had prior whole-spine imaging by SR available. 41 images acquired using both techniques were analyzed. The dose area product (DAP) and patient age, weight, height, and body-mass index were recorded. Image quality was assessed for 28 anatomical landmarks on a 4-point Likert scale by 4 raters. Group-wise comparisons were performed using paired t-tests. Interrater rating reliability was assessed using the interrater correlation coefficient.The mean DAP was significantly lower for SST than for SR (SST 8.0 ± 5.7 cGy · cm², SR 32.5 ± 34.5 cGy · cm², p < 0.001). The image quality was rated good for both modalities (means: SST 2.8 ± 0.6, SR 2.7 ± 0.5, p = 0.38). There was no significant difference in image quality ratings between both modalities. The inter-rater reliability was excellent with an inter-rater correlation coefficient of 0.86. Orthopedic surgeons rated the image quality of SST significantly better than that of SR.This study shows a significant reduction in radiation exposure for slot-scanning whole-spine imaging compared to stitched radiography with equal image quality, which facilitates the reduction of radiation exposure for repeated whole-spine imaging in children and adolescents to 25%. · Image quality is comparable between slot-scanning and stitched whole-spine imaging.. · The slot-scanning technique had a significantly lower dose area product compared with stitched radiographs.. · Orthopedic surgeons rated the image quality of slot-scanning significantly better than that of stitching.. · Radiation exposure in scoliosis whole-spine imaging can be reduced to 25%.. · Liebscher H, Scherzer M, Meißner C et al. Equal image quality and reduced radiation exposure in whole-spine X-ray imaging with slot-scanning technique compared with stitched radiography. Rofo 2025; DOI 10.1055/a-2564-0580.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rofo-fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgebenden Verfahren\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rofo-fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgebenden Verfahren\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2564-0580\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rofo-fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiet Der Rontgenstrahlen Und Der Bildgebenden Verfahren","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2564-0580","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿童和青少年脊柱侧凸的反复全脊柱成像导致显著的累积辐射暴露。低剂量缝隙扫描成像可以减少辐射暴露。本研究的目的是比较使用缝隙扫描技术(SST)和传统缝合放射照相(SR)的全脊柱成像在图像质量和辐射剂量方面的差异。我们招募了30例有SST全脊柱成像临床指征的患者,他们之前有SR全脊柱成像。分析了使用这两种技术获得的41张图像。记录剂量面积积(DAP)和患者年龄、体重、身高、体质指数。图像质量由4位评分者按4点李克特量表对28个解剖标志进行评估。采用配对t检验进行组间比较。用间相关系数评估间评信度。SST的平均DAP显著低于SR (SST 8.0±5.7 cGy·cm²,SR 32.5±34.5 cGy·cm²,p < 0.001)。两种方式的图像质量均被评为良好(平均值:SST 2.8±0.6,SR 2.7±0.5,p = 0.38)。两种方式的图像质量评分无显著差异。评估间信度极好,评估间相关系数为0.86。骨科医生认为SST的图像质量明显优于sr。这项研究表明,在相同的图像质量下,与缝片放射照相相比,缝片扫描全脊柱成像的辐射暴露明显减少,这有助于将儿童和青少年重复全脊柱成像的辐射暴露减少25%。·缝隙扫描和缝合全脊柱成像的图像质量相当。·与缝片相比,缝片扫描技术的剂量面积积明显更低。·骨科医生认为缝位扫描的图像质量明显优于缝合。·脊柱侧凸全脊柱成像中的辐射暴露可降低至25%。·Liebscher H, Scherzer M, Meißner C等。与缝合x线摄影相比,缝位扫描技术在全脊柱x线成像中具有相同的图像质量和减少的辐射暴露。Rofo 2025;DOI 10.1055 / - 2564 - 0580。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Equal image quality and reduced radiation exposure in whole-spine X-ray imaging with slot-scanning technique compared with stitched radiography.

Repeated whole-spine imaging in children and adolescents with scoliosis causes significant cumulative radiation exposure. Low-dose slot-scanning imaging can reduce radiation exposure. The aim of this study was to compare whole-spine imaging using the slot-scanning technique (SST) with conventional stitched radiography (SR) with regard to image quality and radiation dose.We recruited 30 patients with a clinical indication for whole-spine imaging by SST, who had prior whole-spine imaging by SR available. 41 images acquired using both techniques were analyzed. The dose area product (DAP) and patient age, weight, height, and body-mass index were recorded. Image quality was assessed for 28 anatomical landmarks on a 4-point Likert scale by 4 raters. Group-wise comparisons were performed using paired t-tests. Interrater rating reliability was assessed using the interrater correlation coefficient.The mean DAP was significantly lower for SST than for SR (SST 8.0 ± 5.7 cGy · cm², SR 32.5 ± 34.5 cGy · cm², p < 0.001). The image quality was rated good for both modalities (means: SST 2.8 ± 0.6, SR 2.7 ± 0.5, p = 0.38). There was no significant difference in image quality ratings between both modalities. The inter-rater reliability was excellent with an inter-rater correlation coefficient of 0.86. Orthopedic surgeons rated the image quality of SST significantly better than that of SR.This study shows a significant reduction in radiation exposure for slot-scanning whole-spine imaging compared to stitched radiography with equal image quality, which facilitates the reduction of radiation exposure for repeated whole-spine imaging in children and adolescents to 25%. · Image quality is comparable between slot-scanning and stitched whole-spine imaging.. · The slot-scanning technique had a significantly lower dose area product compared with stitched radiographs.. · Orthopedic surgeons rated the image quality of slot-scanning significantly better than that of stitching.. · Radiation exposure in scoliosis whole-spine imaging can be reduced to 25%.. · Liebscher H, Scherzer M, Meißner C et al. Equal image quality and reduced radiation exposure in whole-spine X-ray imaging with slot-scanning technique compared with stitched radiography. Rofo 2025; DOI 10.1055/a-2564-0580.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
340
期刊介绍: Die RöFo veröffentlicht Originalarbeiten, Übersichtsartikel und Fallberichte aus dem Bereich der Radiologie und den weiteren bildgebenden Verfahren in der Medizin. Es dürfen nur Arbeiten eingereicht werden, die noch nicht veröffentlicht sind und die auch nicht gleichzeitig einer anderen Zeitschrift zur Veröffentlichung angeboten wurden. Alle eingereichten Beiträge unterliegen einer sorgfältigen fachlichen Begutachtung. Gegründet 1896 – nur knapp 1 Jahr nach der Entdeckung der Röntgenstrahlen durch C.W. Röntgen – blickt die RöFo auf über 100 Jahre Erfahrung als wichtigstes Publikationsmedium in der deutschsprachigen Radiologie zurück. Sie ist damit die älteste radiologische Fachzeitschrift und schafft es erfolgreich, lange Kontinuität mit dem Anspruch an wissenschaftliches Publizieren auf internationalem Niveau zu verbinden. Durch ihren zentralen Platz im Verlagsprogramm stellte die RöFo die Basis für das heute umfassende und erfolgreiche Radiologie-Medienangebot im Georg Thieme Verlag. Besonders eng verbunden ist die RöFo mit der Geschichte der Röntgengesellschaften in Deutschland und Österreich. Sie ist offizielles Organ von DRG und ÖRG und die Mitglieder der Fachgesellschaften erhalten die Zeitschrift im Rahmen ihrer Mitgliedschaft. Mit ihrem wissenschaftlichen Kernteil und dem eigenen Mitteilungsteil der Fachgesellschaften bietet die RöFo Monat für Monat ein Forum für den Austausch von Inhalten und Botschaften der radiologischen Community im deutschsprachigen Raum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信