{"title":"视觉和听觉认知任务对平滑追踪眼动的差异影响。","authors":"Geoffrey Kaye, Edan Johnston, Jaiden Burke, Natalie Gasson, Welber Marinovic","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM) are important to gather visual information that guides our interactions with moving objects (e.g., tracking a tennis ball, or following a car when driving). In many neurological conditions, from Parkinson's disease to stroke, the voluntary control of SPEM can be compromised. Therefore, SPEMs can serve as sensitive proxies for assessing cognitive and sensorimotor function. Prior research has shown that SPEMs are influenced by attention and working memory load, yet it remains unclear how the sensory modality of concurrent tasks interacts with these effects. Here, we conducted a 3 (working memory load: no load, easy [low load], and hard [high load]) × 2 (sensory modality: visual vs. auditory) experiment to examine how working memory load and secondary task modality interact to affect SPEM in healthy young adults. Participants tracked a moving circle while simultaneously performing an arithmetic task, where they added either constant (1) or variable (1-5) numbers which were presented visually or auditorily. Our results showed that a secondary auditory task increased tracking variability during high cognitive load. In contrast, we found that the visual task improved tracking, reducing variability irrespective of cognitive load. We interpret our results as evidence that auditory processing requires additional top-down control that is critical for the control of smooth pursuit, diverting resources required for smooth pursuit and, consequently, increasing SPEM variability. These findings emphasize the importance of sensory modality in understanding the interactions between working memory and oculomotor control. We suggest that auditory secondary cognitive tasks may provide a more sensitive test of sensorimotor control deficits in future research with clinical populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 5","pages":"e70069"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12051362/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential Effects of Visual and Auditory Cognitive Tasks on Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements.\",\"authors\":\"Geoffrey Kaye, Edan Johnston, Jaiden Burke, Natalie Gasson, Welber Marinovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/psyp.70069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM) are important to gather visual information that guides our interactions with moving objects (e.g., tracking a tennis ball, or following a car when driving). In many neurological conditions, from Parkinson's disease to stroke, the voluntary control of SPEM can be compromised. Therefore, SPEMs can serve as sensitive proxies for assessing cognitive and sensorimotor function. Prior research has shown that SPEMs are influenced by attention and working memory load, yet it remains unclear how the sensory modality of concurrent tasks interacts with these effects. Here, we conducted a 3 (working memory load: no load, easy [low load], and hard [high load]) × 2 (sensory modality: visual vs. auditory) experiment to examine how working memory load and secondary task modality interact to affect SPEM in healthy young adults. Participants tracked a moving circle while simultaneously performing an arithmetic task, where they added either constant (1) or variable (1-5) numbers which were presented visually or auditorily. Our results showed that a secondary auditory task increased tracking variability during high cognitive load. In contrast, we found that the visual task improved tracking, reducing variability irrespective of cognitive load. We interpret our results as evidence that auditory processing requires additional top-down control that is critical for the control of smooth pursuit, diverting resources required for smooth pursuit and, consequently, increasing SPEM variability. These findings emphasize the importance of sensory modality in understanding the interactions between working memory and oculomotor control. We suggest that auditory secondary cognitive tasks may provide a more sensitive test of sensorimotor control deficits in future research with clinical populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"volume\":\"62 5\",\"pages\":\"e70069\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12051362/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70069\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Differential Effects of Visual and Auditory Cognitive Tasks on Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements.
Smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM) are important to gather visual information that guides our interactions with moving objects (e.g., tracking a tennis ball, or following a car when driving). In many neurological conditions, from Parkinson's disease to stroke, the voluntary control of SPEM can be compromised. Therefore, SPEMs can serve as sensitive proxies for assessing cognitive and sensorimotor function. Prior research has shown that SPEMs are influenced by attention and working memory load, yet it remains unclear how the sensory modality of concurrent tasks interacts with these effects. Here, we conducted a 3 (working memory load: no load, easy [low load], and hard [high load]) × 2 (sensory modality: visual vs. auditory) experiment to examine how working memory load and secondary task modality interact to affect SPEM in healthy young adults. Participants tracked a moving circle while simultaneously performing an arithmetic task, where they added either constant (1) or variable (1-5) numbers which were presented visually or auditorily. Our results showed that a secondary auditory task increased tracking variability during high cognitive load. In contrast, we found that the visual task improved tracking, reducing variability irrespective of cognitive load. We interpret our results as evidence that auditory processing requires additional top-down control that is critical for the control of smooth pursuit, diverting resources required for smooth pursuit and, consequently, increasing SPEM variability. These findings emphasize the importance of sensory modality in understanding the interactions between working memory and oculomotor control. We suggest that auditory secondary cognitive tasks may provide a more sensitive test of sensorimotor control deficits in future research with clinical populations.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.