一种新型一次性神经刺激器用于加速手部损伤周围神经再生的临床评价。

Christopher J Coroneos, Carolyn Levis, Michael P Willand, Katelyn Jw So, James R Bain
{"title":"一种新型一次性神经刺激器用于加速手部损伤周围神经再生的临床评价。","authors":"Christopher J Coroneos, Carolyn Levis, Michael P Willand, Katelyn Jw So, James R Bain","doi":"10.1186/s42234-025-00171-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preclinical and early clinical evidence demonstrates that electrical stimulation (ES) applied for one hour following surgical nerve intervention enhances axonal regeneration and functional outcomes. Wide clinical implementation however, has been hindered by a lack of suitably designed stimulators. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate sensory recovery, safety, tolerability, and RCT feasibility for the use of a novel single-use stimulator to deliver ES therapy in an acute nerve transection cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with complete transection of a proper digital nerve were included in the trial. An investigational version of PeriPulse<sup>TM</sup> was used with intraoperative electrode implantation and 1-hour ES therapy delivered postoperatively. Patient tolerance was assessed during stimulation and visual-analogue pain scores were collected at the first post-operative visit. At 3- and 6-months post-op, sensory recovery and quality of life were assessed using 2-point discrimination, monofilament tests, and the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 patients were enrolled. Intraoperative electrode placement did not impact operating room time, taking less than 5 minutes to implement. There were no related adverse events. Participants reported tolerable stimulation during ES therapy with no reports of pain. At the first post-operative visit patients had a mean visual-analogue pain score of 0.6 (range 0 - 1.9). Pressure threshold detection significantly improved between baseline, 3 months and 6 months. A greater proportion of ES treated patients (87.5%) had improved hand pressure thresholds (diminished light touch or diminished protective sensation) at 6 months compared to a historical comparator group. DASH scores improved over the timeline. Participants treated with ES therapy experienced minimal postoperative functional disability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of the PeriPulse<sup>TM</sup> prototype for the delivery of perioperative ES therapy was safe, well-tolerated, and usable. Sensory recovery was demonstrated and a larger RCT is feasible.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong> NCT04732936; 2021 - 01 - 29.</p>","PeriodicalId":72363,"journal":{"name":"Bioelectronic medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12023366/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical evaluation of a novel disposable neurostimulator used to accelerate regeneration of injured peripheral nerves in the hand.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher J Coroneos, Carolyn Levis, Michael P Willand, Katelyn Jw So, James R Bain\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42234-025-00171-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preclinical and early clinical evidence demonstrates that electrical stimulation (ES) applied for one hour following surgical nerve intervention enhances axonal regeneration and functional outcomes. Wide clinical implementation however, has been hindered by a lack of suitably designed stimulators. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate sensory recovery, safety, tolerability, and RCT feasibility for the use of a novel single-use stimulator to deliver ES therapy in an acute nerve transection cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with complete transection of a proper digital nerve were included in the trial. An investigational version of PeriPulse<sup>TM</sup> was used with intraoperative electrode implantation and 1-hour ES therapy delivered postoperatively. Patient tolerance was assessed during stimulation and visual-analogue pain scores were collected at the first post-operative visit. At 3- and 6-months post-op, sensory recovery and quality of life were assessed using 2-point discrimination, monofilament tests, and the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 patients were enrolled. Intraoperative electrode placement did not impact operating room time, taking less than 5 minutes to implement. There were no related adverse events. Participants reported tolerable stimulation during ES therapy with no reports of pain. At the first post-operative visit patients had a mean visual-analogue pain score of 0.6 (range 0 - 1.9). Pressure threshold detection significantly improved between baseline, 3 months and 6 months. A greater proportion of ES treated patients (87.5%) had improved hand pressure thresholds (diminished light touch or diminished protective sensation) at 6 months compared to a historical comparator group. DASH scores improved over the timeline. Participants treated with ES therapy experienced minimal postoperative functional disability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of the PeriPulse<sup>TM</sup> prototype for the delivery of perioperative ES therapy was safe, well-tolerated, and usable. Sensory recovery was demonstrated and a larger RCT is feasible.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong> NCT04732936; 2021 - 01 - 29.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioelectronic medicine\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12023366/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioelectronic medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42234-025-00171-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioelectronic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42234-025-00171-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床前和早期临床证据表明,电刺激(ES)在手术神经干预后1小时可增强轴突再生和功能结果。然而,由于缺乏适当设计的刺激器,广泛的临床实施受到阻碍。这项初步研究的目的是调查在急性神经横断队列中使用一种新型的一次性刺激器进行ES治疗的感觉恢复、安全性、耐受性和RCT可行性。方法:将指神经完全断裂的患者纳入试验。实验版本的PeriPulseTM被用于术中电极植入和术后1小时的ES治疗。在刺激期间评估患者耐受性,并在术后第一次就诊时收集视觉模拟疼痛评分。术后3个月和6个月,分别采用2点判别法、单丝试验和手臂、肩部和手部残疾(DASH)问卷评估感觉恢复和生活质量。结果:共纳入10例患者。术中电极放置不影响手术室时间,只需不到5分钟即可完成。没有相关的不良事件。在ES治疗期间,参与者报告了可耐受的刺激,没有疼痛的报告。在术后第一次就诊时,患者的平均视觉模拟疼痛评分为0.6(范围0 - 1.9)。在基线、3个月和6个月期间,压力阈值检测明显改善。与历史比较组相比,更大比例的ES治疗患者(87.5%)在6个月时手压阈值改善(轻触减少或保护性感觉减少)。随着时间的推移,DASH分数有所提高。接受ES治疗的参与者术后功能障碍最小。结论:使用PeriPulseTM原型进行围手术期ES治疗是安全、耐受性良好且可用的。感觉恢复被证实,更大的RCT是可行的。试验注册:NCT04732936;2021 - 01 - 29。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical evaluation of a novel disposable neurostimulator used to accelerate regeneration of injured peripheral nerves in the hand.

Background: Preclinical and early clinical evidence demonstrates that electrical stimulation (ES) applied for one hour following surgical nerve intervention enhances axonal regeneration and functional outcomes. Wide clinical implementation however, has been hindered by a lack of suitably designed stimulators. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate sensory recovery, safety, tolerability, and RCT feasibility for the use of a novel single-use stimulator to deliver ES therapy in an acute nerve transection cohort.

Methods: Patients with complete transection of a proper digital nerve were included in the trial. An investigational version of PeriPulseTM was used with intraoperative electrode implantation and 1-hour ES therapy delivered postoperatively. Patient tolerance was assessed during stimulation and visual-analogue pain scores were collected at the first post-operative visit. At 3- and 6-months post-op, sensory recovery and quality of life were assessed using 2-point discrimination, monofilament tests, and the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, respectively.

Results: A total of 10 patients were enrolled. Intraoperative electrode placement did not impact operating room time, taking less than 5 minutes to implement. There were no related adverse events. Participants reported tolerable stimulation during ES therapy with no reports of pain. At the first post-operative visit patients had a mean visual-analogue pain score of 0.6 (range 0 - 1.9). Pressure threshold detection significantly improved between baseline, 3 months and 6 months. A greater proportion of ES treated patients (87.5%) had improved hand pressure thresholds (diminished light touch or diminished protective sensation) at 6 months compared to a historical comparator group. DASH scores improved over the timeline. Participants treated with ES therapy experienced minimal postoperative functional disability.

Conclusions: The use of the PeriPulseTM prototype for the delivery of perioperative ES therapy was safe, well-tolerated, and usable. Sensory recovery was demonstrated and a larger RCT is feasible.

Trial registration:  NCT04732936; 2021 - 01 - 29.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信