急诊科和COVID-19大流行压力测试:两个欧洲环境的比较。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Laura Tomaino, Ilaria Roncarati, Silvia Rodríguez-Mireles, Eva Rivas-Wagner, Beatriz González López-Valcárcel, Carlo La Vecchia, Eva Negri, Valerio Di Maio, Susanna Contucci, Lorenzo Falsetti, Gianluca Moroncini, Lluís Serra-Majem
{"title":"急诊科和COVID-19大流行压力测试:两个欧洲环境的比较。","authors":"Laura Tomaino, Ilaria Roncarati, Silvia Rodríguez-Mireles, Eva Rivas-Wagner, Beatriz González López-Valcárcel, Carlo La Vecchia, Eva Negri, Valerio Di Maio, Susanna Contucci, Lorenzo Falsetti, Gianluca Moroncini, Lluís Serra-Majem","doi":"10.1159/000546166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the changes in the Emergency Department (ED) activity of two hospitals during the 2020 lockdown and corresponding timeframes in 2019 and 2021 to assess whether a more structured primary healthcare service could have influenced the COVID-19 pressure on the ED.</p><p><strong>Subject and methods: </strong>This is a multicenter, retrospective study on adult subjects registered to the selected ED during the timeframes considered. Patients <16 years old and women with obstetric or gynecological complaints were excluded.</p><p><strong>Study period: </strong>March 09 to May 03 for the Italian ED (55 days) and March 14 to May 10 for the Spanish ED (57 days) in 2019, 2020 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Primary outcome: </strong>difference in the number of ED admissions.</p><p><strong>Secondary outcomes: </strong>differences in hospital admission rates, priority code at triage, and disease group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, a greater number of patients flowed through the Spanish ED (14,034 vs 8,569 in 2019, 7,208 vs 3,101 in 2020, and 13,214 vs 5,555 in 2021), with smaller proportional declines and lower admission rates (13% vs 16.9% in 2019, 19.6% vs 34.3% in 2020, and 14.3% vs 26.3% in 2021) observed. Most referrals were for non-emergency conditions, followed by trauma and intoxications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In comparison to the Italian setting, the Spanish ED showed increased activity alongside lower hospitalization rates. Further investigation is required to evaluate the potential role of more structured primary healthcare assistance in enhancing the discharge rate to homecare or primary healthcare facilities during the specified timeframes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18455,"journal":{"name":"Medical Principles and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency Department and COVID-19 Pandemic Stress Test: A Comparison between Two European Settings.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Tomaino, Ilaria Roncarati, Silvia Rodríguez-Mireles, Eva Rivas-Wagner, Beatriz González López-Valcárcel, Carlo La Vecchia, Eva Negri, Valerio Di Maio, Susanna Contucci, Lorenzo Falsetti, Gianluca Moroncini, Lluís Serra-Majem\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000546166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the changes in the Emergency Department (ED) activity of two hospitals during the 2020 lockdown and corresponding timeframes in 2019 and 2021 to assess whether a more structured primary healthcare service could have influenced the COVID-19 pressure on the ED.</p><p><strong>Subject and methods: </strong>This is a multicenter, retrospective study on adult subjects registered to the selected ED during the timeframes considered. Patients <16 years old and women with obstetric or gynecological complaints were excluded.</p><p><strong>Study period: </strong>March 09 to May 03 for the Italian ED (55 days) and March 14 to May 10 for the Spanish ED (57 days) in 2019, 2020 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Primary outcome: </strong>difference in the number of ED admissions.</p><p><strong>Secondary outcomes: </strong>differences in hospital admission rates, priority code at triage, and disease group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, a greater number of patients flowed through the Spanish ED (14,034 vs 8,569 in 2019, 7,208 vs 3,101 in 2020, and 13,214 vs 5,555 in 2021), with smaller proportional declines and lower admission rates (13% vs 16.9% in 2019, 19.6% vs 34.3% in 2020, and 14.3% vs 26.3% in 2021) observed. Most referrals were for non-emergency conditions, followed by trauma and intoxications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In comparison to the Italian setting, the Spanish ED showed increased activity alongside lower hospitalization rates. Further investigation is required to evaluate the potential role of more structured primary healthcare assistance in enhancing the discharge rate to homecare or primary healthcare facilities during the specified timeframes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Principles and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Principles and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546166\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Principles and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546166","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析两家医院在2020年封锁期间以及2019年和2021年相应时间框架内急诊科(ED)活动的变化,以评估更结构化的初级卫生保健服务是否会影响急诊科的COVID-19压力。受试者和方法:这是一项多中心回顾性研究,研究对象是在考虑的时间框架内在选定的急诊科登记的成人受试者。研究期:2019年、2020年和2021年,意大利急诊科为3月09日至5月03日(55天),西班牙急诊科为3月14日至5月10日(57天)。主要结果:ED入院人数的差异。次要结局:住院率、分诊时的优先编码和疾病组的差异。结果:总体而言,通过西班牙急诊科的患者数量增加(2019年为14034人对8569人,2020年为7208人对3101人,2021年为13214人对5555人),比例下降较小,入院率较低(2019年为13%对16.9%,2020年为19.6%对34.3%,2021年为14.3%对26.3%)。大多数转介是非紧急情况,其次是创伤和中毒。结论:与意大利相比,西班牙急诊科的活动增加,住院率更低。需要进一步调查,以评估更有组织的初级保健援助在提高家庭护理或初级保健设施在规定时间内的出院率方面的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emergency Department and COVID-19 Pandemic Stress Test: A Comparison between Two European Settings.

Objective: To analyze the changes in the Emergency Department (ED) activity of two hospitals during the 2020 lockdown and corresponding timeframes in 2019 and 2021 to assess whether a more structured primary healthcare service could have influenced the COVID-19 pressure on the ED.

Subject and methods: This is a multicenter, retrospective study on adult subjects registered to the selected ED during the timeframes considered. Patients <16 years old and women with obstetric or gynecological complaints were excluded.

Study period: March 09 to May 03 for the Italian ED (55 days) and March 14 to May 10 for the Spanish ED (57 days) in 2019, 2020 and 2021.

Primary outcome: difference in the number of ED admissions.

Secondary outcomes: differences in hospital admission rates, priority code at triage, and disease group.

Results: Overall, a greater number of patients flowed through the Spanish ED (14,034 vs 8,569 in 2019, 7,208 vs 3,101 in 2020, and 13,214 vs 5,555 in 2021), with smaller proportional declines and lower admission rates (13% vs 16.9% in 2019, 19.6% vs 34.3% in 2020, and 14.3% vs 26.3% in 2021) observed. Most referrals were for non-emergency conditions, followed by trauma and intoxications.

Conclusions: In comparison to the Italian setting, the Spanish ED showed increased activity alongside lower hospitalization rates. Further investigation is required to evaluate the potential role of more structured primary healthcare assistance in enhancing the discharge rate to homecare or primary healthcare facilities during the specified timeframes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Principles and Practice
Medical Principles and Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Medical Principles and Practice'', as the journal of the Health Sciences Centre, Kuwait University, aims to be a publication of international repute that will be a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the health sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信