头孢菌素的产生与开放性骨折手术部位感染之间的关系:一项前瞻性队列研究。

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Zhenbang Yang, Hongyu Meng, Junyong Li, Pei Du, Hongzhi Lv, Kuo Zhao, Junzhe Zhang, Ming Li, Zhucheng Jin, Ziheng Peng, Dandan Ye, Kai Ding, Zhaohui Song, Juan Wang, Xin Xing, Yanbin Zhu, Yingze Zhang, Wei Chen
{"title":"头孢菌素的产生与开放性骨折手术部位感染之间的关系:一项前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Zhenbang Yang, Hongyu Meng, Junyong Li, Pei Du, Hongzhi Lv, Kuo Zhao, Junzhe Zhang, Ming Li, Zhucheng Jin, Ziheng Peng, Dandan Ye, Kai Ding, Zhaohui Song, Juan Wang, Xin Xing, Yanbin Zhu, Yingze Zhang, Wei Chen","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of cephalosporins for surgical site infection (SSI) prevention has become a clinical routine, however, high-level evidence regarding the optimal generation for open fractures is currently limited. This study aims to investigate the association between the generation of cephalosporins and SSI risk in open fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study used data from the Surgical Site Infection in Orthopedic Surgery (SSIOS), a prospectively maintained database, conducted at a tertiary orthopedic university hospital from October 2014 to December 2020. The primary outcome was occurrence of SSI within 1 year after operation, and its association with the generation of cephalosporins was examined using multivariable logistic regressions and generalized estimating equations. Generalized additive models were used to calculate the relative contribution of potential factors likely influencing SSI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3582 eligible patients, 74.6% males, with a mean age of 43.7 ± 14.1 years, were included. First-, second-, and third-generation cephalosporins were used in 1957 (54.6%), 1219 (34.0%), and 406 (11.3%) patients. Compared to first-generation cephalosporins, the use of second-generation cephalosporins was significantly associated with a higher risk of SSI (absolute risk difference [ARD] = 3.70%; 95% CI, 1.90%-5.51%; adjusted OR [aOR] = 1.604; 95% CI, 1.212-2.124), whereas third-generation cephalosporins were not (ARD = 1.02%; 95% CI, -1.78% to 3.82%; aOR = 1.234; 95% CI, 0.790-1.880). Among the 28 potential factors considered, the generation of cephalosporins was ranked 9th in terms of its impact on the risk of SSI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Perioperative use of higher-generation cephalosporins was not associated with a reduction in postoperative surgical site infections in open fractures. Our study supports existing guidelines that recommend the use of first-generation cephalosporins as the preferred agents for preventing SSIs in open fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between generation of cephalosporins and surgical site infection in open fractures: a prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Zhenbang Yang, Hongyu Meng, Junyong Li, Pei Du, Hongzhi Lv, Kuo Zhao, Junzhe Zhang, Ming Li, Zhucheng Jin, Ziheng Peng, Dandan Ye, Kai Ding, Zhaohui Song, Juan Wang, Xin Xing, Yanbin Zhu, Yingze Zhang, Wei Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of cephalosporins for surgical site infection (SSI) prevention has become a clinical routine, however, high-level evidence regarding the optimal generation for open fractures is currently limited. This study aims to investigate the association between the generation of cephalosporins and SSI risk in open fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study used data from the Surgical Site Infection in Orthopedic Surgery (SSIOS), a prospectively maintained database, conducted at a tertiary orthopedic university hospital from October 2014 to December 2020. The primary outcome was occurrence of SSI within 1 year after operation, and its association with the generation of cephalosporins was examined using multivariable logistic regressions and generalized estimating equations. Generalized additive models were used to calculate the relative contribution of potential factors likely influencing SSI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3582 eligible patients, 74.6% males, with a mean age of 43.7 ± 14.1 years, were included. First-, second-, and third-generation cephalosporins were used in 1957 (54.6%), 1219 (34.0%), and 406 (11.3%) patients. Compared to first-generation cephalosporins, the use of second-generation cephalosporins was significantly associated with a higher risk of SSI (absolute risk difference [ARD] = 3.70%; 95% CI, 1.90%-5.51%; adjusted OR [aOR] = 1.604; 95% CI, 1.212-2.124), whereas third-generation cephalosporins were not (ARD = 1.02%; 95% CI, -1.78% to 3.82%; aOR = 1.234; 95% CI, 0.790-1.880). Among the 28 potential factors considered, the generation of cephalosporins was ranked 9th in terms of its impact on the risk of SSI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Perioperative use of higher-generation cephalosporins was not associated with a reduction in postoperative surgical site infections in open fractures. Our study supports existing guidelines that recommend the use of first-generation cephalosporins as the preferred agents for preventing SSIs in open fractures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002371\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002371","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用头孢菌素预防手术部位感染(SSI)已成为临床常规,然而,目前关于开放性骨折最佳生成的高水平证据有限。本研究旨在探讨开放性骨折中头孢菌素的产生与SSI风险之间的关系。方法:这项前瞻性队列研究使用了2014年10月至2020年12月在某三级骨科大学医院进行的骨科手术部位感染(SSIOS)的前瞻性维护数据库的数据。主要预后指标为术后1年内SSI的发生情况,并采用多变量logistic回归和广义估计方程检验其与头孢菌素产生的关系。采用广义加性模型计算可能影响SSI的潜在因素的相对贡献。结果:共纳入3582例符合条件的患者,男性占74.6%,平均年龄43.7±14.1岁。第一代、第二代和第三代头孢菌素分别用于1957例(54.6%)、1219例(34.0%)和406例(11.3%)患者。与第一代头孢菌素相比,第二代头孢菌素的使用与更高的SSI风险显著相关(绝对风险差[ARD] = 3.70%;95% ci, 1.90%-5.51%;调整后OR [aOR] = 1.604;95% CI, 1.212-2.124),而第三代头孢菌素则没有(ARD = 1.02%;95% CI, -1.78% ~ 3.82%;aOR = 1.234;95% ci, 0.790-1.880)。在考虑的28个潜在因素中,头孢菌素的产生对SSI风险的影响排名第9位。结论:围手术期使用高代头孢菌素与开放性骨折术后手术部位感染的减少无关。我们的研究支持现有的指南,推荐使用第一代头孢菌素作为预防开放性骨折中ssi的首选药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between generation of cephalosporins and surgical site infection in open fractures: a prospective cohort study.

Background: The use of cephalosporins for surgical site infection (SSI) prevention has become a clinical routine, however, high-level evidence regarding the optimal generation for open fractures is currently limited. This study aims to investigate the association between the generation of cephalosporins and SSI risk in open fractures.

Methods: This prospective cohort study used data from the Surgical Site Infection in Orthopedic Surgery (SSIOS), a prospectively maintained database, conducted at a tertiary orthopedic university hospital from October 2014 to December 2020. The primary outcome was occurrence of SSI within 1 year after operation, and its association with the generation of cephalosporins was examined using multivariable logistic regressions and generalized estimating equations. Generalized additive models were used to calculate the relative contribution of potential factors likely influencing SSI.

Results: A total of 3582 eligible patients, 74.6% males, with a mean age of 43.7 ± 14.1 years, were included. First-, second-, and third-generation cephalosporins were used in 1957 (54.6%), 1219 (34.0%), and 406 (11.3%) patients. Compared to first-generation cephalosporins, the use of second-generation cephalosporins was significantly associated with a higher risk of SSI (absolute risk difference [ARD] = 3.70%; 95% CI, 1.90%-5.51%; adjusted OR [aOR] = 1.604; 95% CI, 1.212-2.124), whereas third-generation cephalosporins were not (ARD = 1.02%; 95% CI, -1.78% to 3.82%; aOR = 1.234; 95% CI, 0.790-1.880). Among the 28 potential factors considered, the generation of cephalosporins was ranked 9th in terms of its impact on the risk of SSI.

Conclusion: Perioperative use of higher-generation cephalosporins was not associated with a reduction in postoperative surgical site infections in open fractures. Our study supports existing guidelines that recommend the use of first-generation cephalosporins as the preferred agents for preventing SSIs in open fractures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信