[四种风险评价方法在金属矿山企业噪声性听力损失风险评价中的应用]。

Xin Wang, Ning Kang, Kai Liu, Kang Ning, Yiwen Dong, Meng Ye
{"title":"[四种风险评价方法在金属矿山企业噪声性听力损失风险评价中的应用]。","authors":"Xin Wang, Ning Kang, Kai Liu, Kang Ning, Yiwen Dong, Meng Ye","doi":"10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2025.02.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the application of four risk assessment methods in the noise-induced hearing loss risk assessment of metal mining enterprises.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using typical sampling method, 27 metal mining enterprises were selected in Guangdong, Shandong and Liaoning Provinces. Enterprises basic information and noise exposure data of key positions were collected by using on-site hygiene investigation and noise detecting method. Occupational hazard risk index method, classification of occupational exposure to noise, guidelines for risk management of occupational noise hazard, the International Council on Mining and Mentals&apos;(ICMM) risk rating table method were used to analyze the risk of noise-induced hearing loss in metal mining enterprises.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median individual noise exposure of metal mining positions was 83.0dB(A), and 36.5%(70/192) of the measured values exceeded 85 dB(A). The noise exposure levels of excavation workers(93.5 dB(A)), mill operators(90.4 dB(A)) and crusher operators(86.2 dB(A)) were higher relatively. Different mining method(underground and surface) had significant effects on noise exposure of workers(P&lt;0.05), and the noise exceeding standard rate of underground mining was higher(42.4%). According to the result of four risk assessment method, The overall occupational health risk level of noise-induced hearing loss was medium(weighted score 1.98) by ICMM risk rating table method, while the overall occupational health risk level of noise-induced hearing loss was low by occupational hazard risk index method, classification of occupational exposure to noise and guidelines for risk management of occupational noise hazard(weighted score 1.98, 1.73 and 1.86, respectively). The risk of excavation workers and mill operators were the highest, the risk of crusher operators was high, and the risk of air compressor operators, Screening operators, control workers, maintenance workers and pump operators were low or very low. The consistency of four risk assessment method was moderate(W=0.300, P&lt;0.001), The classification of occupational exposure to noise and the guidelines for risk management of occupational noise hazard showed that these two risk assessment method had strong consistencies(Kappa=0.789, P&lt;0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overall occupational health risk level of noise-induced hearing loss in metal mining enterprises in three provinces was low, and the highest risk positions were excavation workers and mill operators in 2019-2021. The classification of occupational exposure to noise and the guidelines for risk management of occupational noise hazard might overestimate the noise hazard risk when workers were equipped personal protection well. ICMM risk rating table method can distinguish the risk levels of different positions effectively and identify the high-risk hearing loss position as early warning. Occupational hazard risk index method was comprehensive and practical.</p>","PeriodicalId":57744,"journal":{"name":"卫生研究","volume":"54 2","pages":"301-309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Application of four risk assessment methods to risk assessment of noise-induced hearing loss in metal mining enterprises].\",\"authors\":\"Xin Wang, Ning Kang, Kai Liu, Kang Ning, Yiwen Dong, Meng Ye\",\"doi\":\"10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2025.02.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the application of four risk assessment methods in the noise-induced hearing loss risk assessment of metal mining enterprises.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using typical sampling method, 27 metal mining enterprises were selected in Guangdong, Shandong and Liaoning Provinces. Enterprises basic information and noise exposure data of key positions were collected by using on-site hygiene investigation and noise detecting method. Occupational hazard risk index method, classification of occupational exposure to noise, guidelines for risk management of occupational noise hazard, the International Council on Mining and Mentals&apos;(ICMM) risk rating table method were used to analyze the risk of noise-induced hearing loss in metal mining enterprises.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median individual noise exposure of metal mining positions was 83.0dB(A), and 36.5%(70/192) of the measured values exceeded 85 dB(A). The noise exposure levels of excavation workers(93.5 dB(A)), mill operators(90.4 dB(A)) and crusher operators(86.2 dB(A)) were higher relatively. Different mining method(underground and surface) had significant effects on noise exposure of workers(P&lt;0.05), and the noise exceeding standard rate of underground mining was higher(42.4%). According to the result of four risk assessment method, The overall occupational health risk level of noise-induced hearing loss was medium(weighted score 1.98) by ICMM risk rating table method, while the overall occupational health risk level of noise-induced hearing loss was low by occupational hazard risk index method, classification of occupational exposure to noise and guidelines for risk management of occupational noise hazard(weighted score 1.98, 1.73 and 1.86, respectively). The risk of excavation workers and mill operators were the highest, the risk of crusher operators was high, and the risk of air compressor operators, Screening operators, control workers, maintenance workers and pump operators were low or very low. The consistency of four risk assessment method was moderate(W=0.300, P&lt;0.001), The classification of occupational exposure to noise and the guidelines for risk management of occupational noise hazard showed that these two risk assessment method had strong consistencies(Kappa=0.789, P&lt;0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overall occupational health risk level of noise-induced hearing loss in metal mining enterprises in three provinces was low, and the highest risk positions were excavation workers and mill operators in 2019-2021. The classification of occupational exposure to noise and the guidelines for risk management of occupational noise hazard might overestimate the noise hazard risk when workers were equipped personal protection well. ICMM risk rating table method can distinguish the risk levels of different positions effectively and identify the high-risk hearing loss position as early warning. Occupational hazard risk index method was comprehensive and practical.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":57744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"卫生研究\",\"volume\":\"54 2\",\"pages\":\"301-309\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"卫生研究\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2025.02.019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"卫生研究","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2025.02.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较四种风险评价方法在金属矿山企业噪声性听力损失风险评价中的应用。方法:采用典型抽样方法,选取广东、山东、辽宁三省27家金属矿山企业。采用现场卫生调查和噪声检测方法,收集企业基本信息和重点岗位噪声暴露数据。采用职业危害风险指数法、职业噪声暴露分级法、职业噪声危害风险管理指南、国际矿业与心理理事会(ICMM)风险评定表法对金属矿山企业噪声性听力损失风险进行分析。结果:金属矿工位个体噪声暴露中位数为83.0dB(A),超过85 dB(A)的占36.5%(70/192)。挖掘工人(93.5 dB(A))、磨机操作员(90.4 dB(A))和破碎机操作员(86.2 dB(A))的噪声暴露水平相对较高。不同开采方式(地下开采和地表开采)对工人噪声暴露有显著影响(P<0.05),其中地下开采噪声超标率较高(42.4%)。根据四种风险评价方法的结果,ICMM风险评定表法得出噪声性听力损失的总体职业健康风险等级为中等(加权得分1.98),而职业危害风险指数法、职业接触噪声分类法和职业噪声危害风险管理指南的总体职业健康风险等级为低(加权得分分别为1.98、1.73和1.86)。挖掘工人和磨机操作员的风险最高,破碎机操作员的风险较高,空压机操作员、筛分操作员、控制工人、维修工人和泵操作员的风险较低或极低。四种风险评价方法的一致性为中等(W=0.300, P<0.001),职业噪声暴露分类和职业噪声危害风险管理指南显示两种风险评价方法具有较强的一致性(Kappa=0.789, P<0.001)。结论:2019-2021年三省金属矿山企业噪声性听力损失职业健康风险总体水平较低,风险最高的岗位为采掘工人和磨机操作人员。职业性噪声暴露的分类和职业性噪声危害风险管理指南可能会在工人个人防护较好的情况下高估噪声危害风险。ICMM风险评定表法可以有效区分不同部位的风险等级,识别听力损失高危部位作为预警。职业危害风险指数法具有综合性和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Application of four risk assessment methods to risk assessment of noise-induced hearing loss in metal mining enterprises].

Objective: To compare the application of four risk assessment methods in the noise-induced hearing loss risk assessment of metal mining enterprises.

Methods: Using typical sampling method, 27 metal mining enterprises were selected in Guangdong, Shandong and Liaoning Provinces. Enterprises basic information and noise exposure data of key positions were collected by using on-site hygiene investigation and noise detecting method. Occupational hazard risk index method, classification of occupational exposure to noise, guidelines for risk management of occupational noise hazard, the International Council on Mining and Mentals'(ICMM) risk rating table method were used to analyze the risk of noise-induced hearing loss in metal mining enterprises.

Results: The median individual noise exposure of metal mining positions was 83.0dB(A), and 36.5%(70/192) of the measured values exceeded 85 dB(A). The noise exposure levels of excavation workers(93.5 dB(A)), mill operators(90.4 dB(A)) and crusher operators(86.2 dB(A)) were higher relatively. Different mining method(underground and surface) had significant effects on noise exposure of workers(P<0.05), and the noise exceeding standard rate of underground mining was higher(42.4%). According to the result of four risk assessment method, The overall occupational health risk level of noise-induced hearing loss was medium(weighted score 1.98) by ICMM risk rating table method, while the overall occupational health risk level of noise-induced hearing loss was low by occupational hazard risk index method, classification of occupational exposure to noise and guidelines for risk management of occupational noise hazard(weighted score 1.98, 1.73 and 1.86, respectively). The risk of excavation workers and mill operators were the highest, the risk of crusher operators was high, and the risk of air compressor operators, Screening operators, control workers, maintenance workers and pump operators were low or very low. The consistency of four risk assessment method was moderate(W=0.300, P<0.001), The classification of occupational exposure to noise and the guidelines for risk management of occupational noise hazard showed that these two risk assessment method had strong consistencies(Kappa=0.789, P<0.001).

Conclusion: The overall occupational health risk level of noise-induced hearing loss in metal mining enterprises in three provinces was low, and the highest risk positions were excavation workers and mill operators in 2019-2021. The classification of occupational exposure to noise and the guidelines for risk management of occupational noise hazard might overestimate the noise hazard risk when workers were equipped personal protection well. ICMM risk rating table method can distinguish the risk levels of different positions effectively and identify the high-risk hearing loss position as early warning. Occupational hazard risk index method was comprehensive and practical.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8734
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信