Lisa Becker, Jens Hausmann, Rieke Wellpott, Anna-Maria Hartmann
{"title":"高度保守的离子结合位点在小鼠KCC4中并不都具有功能相关性。","authors":"Lisa Becker, Jens Hausmann, Rieke Wellpott, Anna-Maria Hartmann","doi":"10.3389/fmolb.2025.1556250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The potassium chloride cotransporter 4 (KCC4) is expressed in various tissues and plays an important role in distal renal acidification and hearing development. Although KCCs transport K<sup>+</sup> and Cl<sup>-</sup> in a 1:1 stoichiometry, two Cl<sup>-</sup> coordination sites were indicated via cryo-electron microscopy (CryoEM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a comprehensive analysis, we analyzed here the consequences of point mutation of residues coordinating potassium, and chloride in the first (Cl<sub>1</sub>) and second (Cl<sub>2</sub>) coordinating site in KCC4 using Tl<sup>+</sup> based flux measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surprisingly, not all highly conserved coordination sites in KCC4 are essential. Three out of five residues (N<sup>131</sup>, Y<sup>216</sup>, and T<sup>432</sup>) are functionally relevant for potassium coordination. For chloride coordination in Cl<sub>1</sub>, all three residues (G<sup>134</sup>, V<sup>135</sup>, and I<sup>136</sup>) are important, whereas three out of four residues (G<sup>433</sup>, M<sup>435</sup>, and Y<sup>589</sup>) are relevant for chloride binding in Cl<sub>2</sub>. As all ion coordination sites are important in KCC2, this indicates that there is a certain flexibility in the stringency of ion coordination in KCC4. One possible reason for the different relevance of ion coordination sites could be the large extracellular loop (LEL). The LEL is structured differently within KCCs and is directly linked to the transmembrane domain (TM) 6, where most of the coordination sites reside. Substitution of ion coordination sites in the KCC2<sub>2-4-2</sub> chimera, in which the LEL from mouse KCC4 is exchanged with the LEL of rat KCC2, have the same effect as substitutions in rat KCC2. An exception is the substitution of the potassium coordination site I<sup>111</sup> in TM1, which shows enhanced activity in the KCC2<sub>2-4-2</sub> chimera compared to the impaired activity in rat KCC2 and not affected activity in mouse KCC4.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thus, the different relevance of the ion coordination sites between KCC2 and KCC4 cannot be attributed solely to the different structured LEL; other structural elements must also be involved here.</p>","PeriodicalId":12465,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences","volume":"12 ","pages":"1556250"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11994965/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Highly conserved ion binding sites are not all functionally relevant in mouse KCC4.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Becker, Jens Hausmann, Rieke Wellpott, Anna-Maria Hartmann\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmolb.2025.1556250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The potassium chloride cotransporter 4 (KCC4) is expressed in various tissues and plays an important role in distal renal acidification and hearing development. Although KCCs transport K<sup>+</sup> and Cl<sup>-</sup> in a 1:1 stoichiometry, two Cl<sup>-</sup> coordination sites were indicated via cryo-electron microscopy (CryoEM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a comprehensive analysis, we analyzed here the consequences of point mutation of residues coordinating potassium, and chloride in the first (Cl<sub>1</sub>) and second (Cl<sub>2</sub>) coordinating site in KCC4 using Tl<sup>+</sup> based flux measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surprisingly, not all highly conserved coordination sites in KCC4 are essential. Three out of five residues (N<sup>131</sup>, Y<sup>216</sup>, and T<sup>432</sup>) are functionally relevant for potassium coordination. For chloride coordination in Cl<sub>1</sub>, all three residues (G<sup>134</sup>, V<sup>135</sup>, and I<sup>136</sup>) are important, whereas three out of four residues (G<sup>433</sup>, M<sup>435</sup>, and Y<sup>589</sup>) are relevant for chloride binding in Cl<sub>2</sub>. As all ion coordination sites are important in KCC2, this indicates that there is a certain flexibility in the stringency of ion coordination in KCC4. One possible reason for the different relevance of ion coordination sites could be the large extracellular loop (LEL). The LEL is structured differently within KCCs and is directly linked to the transmembrane domain (TM) 6, where most of the coordination sites reside. Substitution of ion coordination sites in the KCC2<sub>2-4-2</sub> chimera, in which the LEL from mouse KCC4 is exchanged with the LEL of rat KCC2, have the same effect as substitutions in rat KCC2. An exception is the substitution of the potassium coordination site I<sup>111</sup> in TM1, which shows enhanced activity in the KCC2<sub>2-4-2</sub> chimera compared to the impaired activity in rat KCC2 and not affected activity in mouse KCC4.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thus, the different relevance of the ion coordination sites between KCC2 and KCC4 cannot be attributed solely to the different structured LEL; other structural elements must also be involved here.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1556250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11994965/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2025.1556250\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2025.1556250","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Highly conserved ion binding sites are not all functionally relevant in mouse KCC4.
Introduction: The potassium chloride cotransporter 4 (KCC4) is expressed in various tissues and plays an important role in distal renal acidification and hearing development. Although KCCs transport K+ and Cl- in a 1:1 stoichiometry, two Cl- coordination sites were indicated via cryo-electron microscopy (CryoEM).
Methods: In a comprehensive analysis, we analyzed here the consequences of point mutation of residues coordinating potassium, and chloride in the first (Cl1) and second (Cl2) coordinating site in KCC4 using Tl+ based flux measurements.
Results: Surprisingly, not all highly conserved coordination sites in KCC4 are essential. Three out of five residues (N131, Y216, and T432) are functionally relevant for potassium coordination. For chloride coordination in Cl1, all three residues (G134, V135, and I136) are important, whereas three out of four residues (G433, M435, and Y589) are relevant for chloride binding in Cl2. As all ion coordination sites are important in KCC2, this indicates that there is a certain flexibility in the stringency of ion coordination in KCC4. One possible reason for the different relevance of ion coordination sites could be the large extracellular loop (LEL). The LEL is structured differently within KCCs and is directly linked to the transmembrane domain (TM) 6, where most of the coordination sites reside. Substitution of ion coordination sites in the KCC22-4-2 chimera, in which the LEL from mouse KCC4 is exchanged with the LEL of rat KCC2, have the same effect as substitutions in rat KCC2. An exception is the substitution of the potassium coordination site I111 in TM1, which shows enhanced activity in the KCC22-4-2 chimera compared to the impaired activity in rat KCC2 and not affected activity in mouse KCC4.
Conclusion: Thus, the different relevance of the ion coordination sites between KCC2 and KCC4 cannot be attributed solely to the different structured LEL; other structural elements must also be involved here.
期刊介绍:
Much of contemporary investigation in the life sciences is devoted to the molecular-scale understanding of the relationships between genes and the environment — in particular, dynamic alterations in the levels, modifications, and interactions of cellular effectors, including proteins. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences offers an international publication platform for basic as well as applied research; we encourage contributions spanning both established and emerging areas of biology. To this end, the journal draws from empirical disciplines such as structural biology, enzymology, biochemistry, and biophysics, capitalizing as well on the technological advancements that have enabled metabolomics and proteomics measurements in massively parallel throughput, and the development of robust and innovative computational biology strategies. We also recognize influences from medicine and technology, welcoming studies in molecular genetics, molecular diagnostics and therapeutics, and nanotechnology.
Our ultimate objective is the comprehensive illustration of the molecular mechanisms regulating proteins, nucleic acids, carbohydrates, lipids, and small metabolites in organisms across all branches of life.
In addition to interesting new findings, techniques, and applications, Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences will consider new testable hypotheses to inspire different perspectives and stimulate scientific dialogue. The integration of in silico, in vitro, and in vivo approaches will benefit endeavors across all domains of the life sciences.