serpluliumab联合nab -紫杉醇加卡铂与nab -紫杉醇加卡铂作为一线治疗晚期鳞状非小细胞肺癌的成本-效果分析

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-04-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S506976
Hongting Yao, Kai Xu, Man Yu, Xiaoye Wang, Yingzhi Lu, Xin Li, Hong Wu
{"title":"serpluliumab联合nab -紫杉醇加卡铂与nab -紫杉醇加卡铂作为一线治疗晚期鳞状非小细胞肺癌的成本-效果分析","authors":"Hongting Yao, Kai Xu, Man Yu, Xiaoye Wang, Yingzhi Lu, Xin Li, Hong Wu","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S506976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The ASTRUM-004 trial demonstrated the efficacy of serplulimab combined with nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy in untreated patients with advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this combination therapy compared to that of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy alone for advanced squamous NSCLC patients from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A partitioned survival model based on the survival data of the ASTRUM-004 trial was constructed to assess the cost-effectiveness. The direct medical costs and utilities were derived from published literature and real-world medical institutions. The total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. Sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The base-case analysis revealed that serplulimab combined with nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy provided 0.53 incremental QALYs at an incremental cost of $60,790.77, with an ICER of $114,207.24/QALY. The ICER significantly exceeded the Chinese willingness-to-pay threshold ($37,743.79/QALY). Body weight, the utility value of progression-free survival stage, and the price of serplulimab were the main influencing factors of the ICER. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that there was no possibility of cost-effectiveness under the current threshold. Scenario analyses revealed that this combination therapy would only be cost-effective if the price of serplulimab fell by at least 80.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy alone, serplulimab combined with nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy might not be economical for advanced squamous NSCLC patients in China under current pricing conditions. This study suggests that future price reductions for serplulimab could make this therapy more economically viable and provide guidance for drug pricing decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"1309-1321"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12009117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Serplulimab Combined with Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin Compared to Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin Alone as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in China.\",\"authors\":\"Hongting Yao, Kai Xu, Man Yu, Xiaoye Wang, Yingzhi Lu, Xin Li, Hong Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S506976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The ASTRUM-004 trial demonstrated the efficacy of serplulimab combined with nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy in untreated patients with advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this combination therapy compared to that of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy alone for advanced squamous NSCLC patients from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A partitioned survival model based on the survival data of the ASTRUM-004 trial was constructed to assess the cost-effectiveness. The direct medical costs and utilities were derived from published literature and real-world medical institutions. The total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. Sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The base-case analysis revealed that serplulimab combined with nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy provided 0.53 incremental QALYs at an incremental cost of $60,790.77, with an ICER of $114,207.24/QALY. The ICER significantly exceeded the Chinese willingness-to-pay threshold ($37,743.79/QALY). Body weight, the utility value of progression-free survival stage, and the price of serplulimab were the main influencing factors of the ICER. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that there was no possibility of cost-effectiveness under the current threshold. Scenario analyses revealed that this combination therapy would only be cost-effective if the price of serplulimab fell by at least 80.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy alone, serplulimab combined with nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy might not be economical for advanced squamous NSCLC patients in China under current pricing conditions. This study suggests that future price reductions for serplulimab could make this therapy more economically viable and provide guidance for drug pricing decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"1309-1321\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12009117/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S506976\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S506976","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:ASTRUM-004试验证明了serpluliumab联合nab-紫杉醇加卡铂化疗治疗未经治疗的晚期鳞状非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的疗效。我们的研究旨在从中国医疗系统的角度评估该联合治疗晚期鳞状NSCLC患者的成本-效果,并与单用nab-紫杉醇加卡铂化疗进行比较。患者和方法:基于ASTRUM-004试验的生存数据构建分区生存模型,评估成本-效果。直接医疗费用和效用来源于已发表的文献和现实世界的医疗机构。计算总成本、质量调整寿命年(QALYs)和增量成本-效果比(ICERs)。通过敏感性分析和情景分析来评估模型的稳健性。结果:基础病例分析显示,serplulimab联合nab-紫杉醇加卡铂化疗提供0.53个增量QALY,增量成本为60,790.77美元,ICER为114,207.24美元/QALY。ICER明显超过了中国人的支付意愿阈值(37,743.79美元/QALY)。体重、无进展生存期的实用价值和serplulimab的价格是影响ICER的主要因素。概率敏感性分析显示,在目前的阈值下不可能产生成本效益。情景分析显示,只有当serplulimab的价格下降至少80.3%时,这种联合治疗才具有成本效益。结论:与单用nab-紫杉醇加卡铂化疗相比,在目前的价格条件下,serpluliumab联合nab-紫杉醇加卡铂化疗对中国晚期鳞状NSCLC患者可能并不经济。这项研究表明,未来serplulimab的降价可能使这种疗法在经济上更可行,并为药物定价决策提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Serplulimab Combined with Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin Compared to Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin Alone as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in China.

Purpose: The ASTRUM-004 trial demonstrated the efficacy of serplulimab combined with nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy in untreated patients with advanced squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this combination therapy compared to that of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy alone for advanced squamous NSCLC patients from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.

Patients and methods: A partitioned survival model based on the survival data of the ASTRUM-004 trial was constructed to assess the cost-effectiveness. The direct medical costs and utilities were derived from published literature and real-world medical institutions. The total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. Sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the model.

Results: The base-case analysis revealed that serplulimab combined with nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy provided 0.53 incremental QALYs at an incremental cost of $60,790.77, with an ICER of $114,207.24/QALY. The ICER significantly exceeded the Chinese willingness-to-pay threshold ($37,743.79/QALY). Body weight, the utility value of progression-free survival stage, and the price of serplulimab were the main influencing factors of the ICER. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that there was no possibility of cost-effectiveness under the current threshold. Scenario analyses revealed that this combination therapy would only be cost-effective if the price of serplulimab fell by at least 80.3%.

Conclusion: Compared to nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy alone, serplulimab combined with nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy might not be economical for advanced squamous NSCLC patients in China under current pricing conditions. This study suggests that future price reductions for serplulimab could make this therapy more economically viable and provide guidance for drug pricing decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信