转移性上皮样血管内皮瘤患者的一线帕唑帕尼:一项回顾性单中心分析

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Anton Burkhard-Meier, Vera Valerie Rechenauer, Vindi Jurinovic, Markus Albertsmeier, Michael Hoberger, Hans Roland Dürr, Alexander Klein, Thomas Knösel, Wolfgang G Kunz, Andreas Mock, Ada Pusztai, Michael Völkl, Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon, Lars H Lindner, Dorit Di Gioia, Luc M Berclaz
{"title":"转移性上皮样血管内皮瘤患者的一线帕唑帕尼:一项回顾性单中心分析","authors":"Anton Burkhard-Meier, Vera Valerie Rechenauer, Vindi Jurinovic, Markus Albertsmeier, Michael Hoberger, Hans Roland Dürr, Alexander Klein, Thomas Knösel, Wolfgang G Kunz, Andreas Mock, Ada Pusztai, Michael Völkl, Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon, Lars H Lindner, Dorit Di Gioia, Luc M Berclaz","doi":"10.1007/s00432-025-06208-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) represents an ultra-rare, translocated vascular sarcoma with a heterogeneous course of disease. The optimal systemic treatment for patients with advanced EHE remains unclear. We sought to evaluate the value of pazopanib (PAZ) as a first-line treatment in metastatic EHE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen patients with metastatic EHE and PAZ as a first-line treatment at our institution between 2012 und 2023 were reviewed and analyzed with regard to clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a median follow-up of 51.4 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 35.1 and 53.8 months, respectively. In patients with documented prior tumor progression (n = 10), the median PFS and OS were 12.6 and 105 months, respectively. In patients with serosal effusion/ systemic symptoms (n = 4), the median PFS and OS were 6.1 and 10.3 months. The clinical benefit rate of the overall cohort was 62% with no complete or partial responses. Two of four patients experienced a reduction of symptoms (pain and ascites reduction/hemoptysis, respectively) under treatment with PAZ. Toxicity was mainly gastrointestinal and manageable with dose reductions. Permanent treatment interruption due to toxicity was necessary in one patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to systematically report survival outcomes for PAZ as a first-line treatment in patients with metastatic EHE. PAZ is active and safe in patients with metastatic EHE and may be considered as an alternative to sirolimus for specific patient subgroups. RECIST criteria should be questioned for evaluation of treatment response in EHE.</p>","PeriodicalId":15118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","volume":"151 4","pages":"150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First-line pazopanib in patients with metastatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: a retrospective single-center analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Anton Burkhard-Meier, Vera Valerie Rechenauer, Vindi Jurinovic, Markus Albertsmeier, Michael Hoberger, Hans Roland Dürr, Alexander Klein, Thomas Knösel, Wolfgang G Kunz, Andreas Mock, Ada Pusztai, Michael Völkl, Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon, Lars H Lindner, Dorit Di Gioia, Luc M Berclaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00432-025-06208-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) represents an ultra-rare, translocated vascular sarcoma with a heterogeneous course of disease. The optimal systemic treatment for patients with advanced EHE remains unclear. We sought to evaluate the value of pazopanib (PAZ) as a first-line treatment in metastatic EHE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen patients with metastatic EHE and PAZ as a first-line treatment at our institution between 2012 und 2023 were reviewed and analyzed with regard to clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a median follow-up of 51.4 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 35.1 and 53.8 months, respectively. In patients with documented prior tumor progression (n = 10), the median PFS and OS were 12.6 and 105 months, respectively. In patients with serosal effusion/ systemic symptoms (n = 4), the median PFS and OS were 6.1 and 10.3 months. The clinical benefit rate of the overall cohort was 62% with no complete or partial responses. Two of four patients experienced a reduction of symptoms (pain and ascites reduction/hemoptysis, respectively) under treatment with PAZ. Toxicity was mainly gastrointestinal and manageable with dose reductions. Permanent treatment interruption due to toxicity was necessary in one patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to systematically report survival outcomes for PAZ as a first-line treatment in patients with metastatic EHE. PAZ is active and safe in patients with metastatic EHE and may be considered as an alternative to sirolimus for specific patient subgroups. RECIST criteria should be questioned for evaluation of treatment response in EHE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"151 4\",\"pages\":\"150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033179/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06208-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06208-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:上皮样血管内皮瘤(EHE)是一种极其罕见的易位性血管肉瘤,其病程具有异质性。晚期EHE患者的最佳全身治疗方案尚不清楚。我们试图评估帕唑帕尼(PAZ)作为转移性EHE一线治疗的价值。方法:回顾性分析我院2012年至2023年间13例作为一线治疗的转移性EHE和PAZ患者的临床结果。结果:中位随访51.4个月,中位无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为35.1个月和53.8个月。在既往有肿瘤进展记录的患者中(n = 10),中位PFS和OS分别为12.6和105个月。在有浆液积液/全身症状的患者中(n = 4),中位PFS和OS分别为6.1和10.3个月。整个队列的临床获益率为62%,没有完全或部分反应。在PAZ治疗下,四名患者中有两名症状减轻(分别是疼痛和腹水减少/咯血)。毒性主要发生在胃肠道,减少剂量后可控制。有1例患者因毒性而必须永久中断治疗。结论:这是第一个系统报告PAZ作为转移性EHE患者一线治疗的生存结果的研究。PAZ对转移性EHE患者有效且安全,可作为西罗莫司的替代药物用于特定患者亚组。在评价EHE治疗反应时,应质疑RECIST标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First-line pazopanib in patients with metastatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: a retrospective single-center analysis.

Purpose: Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) represents an ultra-rare, translocated vascular sarcoma with a heterogeneous course of disease. The optimal systemic treatment for patients with advanced EHE remains unclear. We sought to evaluate the value of pazopanib (PAZ) as a first-line treatment in metastatic EHE.

Methods: Thirteen patients with metastatic EHE and PAZ as a first-line treatment at our institution between 2012 und 2023 were reviewed and analyzed with regard to clinical outcomes.

Results: At a median follow-up of 51.4 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 35.1 and 53.8 months, respectively. In patients with documented prior tumor progression (n = 10), the median PFS and OS were 12.6 and 105 months, respectively. In patients with serosal effusion/ systemic symptoms (n = 4), the median PFS and OS were 6.1 and 10.3 months. The clinical benefit rate of the overall cohort was 62% with no complete or partial responses. Two of four patients experienced a reduction of symptoms (pain and ascites reduction/hemoptysis, respectively) under treatment with PAZ. Toxicity was mainly gastrointestinal and manageable with dose reductions. Permanent treatment interruption due to toxicity was necessary in one patient.

Conclusion: This is the first study to systematically report survival outcomes for PAZ as a first-line treatment in patients with metastatic EHE. PAZ is active and safe in patients with metastatic EHE and may be considered as an alternative to sirolimus for specific patient subgroups. RECIST criteria should be questioned for evaluation of treatment response in EHE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
577
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology" publishes significant and up-to-date articles within the fields of experimental and clinical oncology. The journal, which is chiefly devoted to Original papers, also includes Reviews as well as Editorials and Guest editorials on current, controversial topics. The section Letters to the editors provides a forum for a rapid exchange of comments and information concerning previously published papers and topics of current interest. Meeting reports provide current information on the latest results presented at important congresses. The following fields are covered: carcinogenesis - etiology, mechanisms; molecular biology; recent developments in tumor therapy; general diagnosis; laboratory diagnosis; diagnostic and experimental pathology; oncologic surgery; and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信