Anton Burkhard-Meier, Vera Valerie Rechenauer, Vindi Jurinovic, Markus Albertsmeier, Michael Hoberger, Hans Roland Dürr, Alexander Klein, Thomas Knösel, Wolfgang G Kunz, Andreas Mock, Ada Pusztai, Michael Völkl, Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon, Lars H Lindner, Dorit Di Gioia, Luc M Berclaz
{"title":"转移性上皮样血管内皮瘤患者的一线帕唑帕尼:一项回顾性单中心分析","authors":"Anton Burkhard-Meier, Vera Valerie Rechenauer, Vindi Jurinovic, Markus Albertsmeier, Michael Hoberger, Hans Roland Dürr, Alexander Klein, Thomas Knösel, Wolfgang G Kunz, Andreas Mock, Ada Pusztai, Michael Völkl, Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon, Lars H Lindner, Dorit Di Gioia, Luc M Berclaz","doi":"10.1007/s00432-025-06208-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) represents an ultra-rare, translocated vascular sarcoma with a heterogeneous course of disease. The optimal systemic treatment for patients with advanced EHE remains unclear. We sought to evaluate the value of pazopanib (PAZ) as a first-line treatment in metastatic EHE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen patients with metastatic EHE and PAZ as a first-line treatment at our institution between 2012 und 2023 were reviewed and analyzed with regard to clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a median follow-up of 51.4 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 35.1 and 53.8 months, respectively. In patients with documented prior tumor progression (n = 10), the median PFS and OS were 12.6 and 105 months, respectively. In patients with serosal effusion/ systemic symptoms (n = 4), the median PFS and OS were 6.1 and 10.3 months. The clinical benefit rate of the overall cohort was 62% with no complete or partial responses. Two of four patients experienced a reduction of symptoms (pain and ascites reduction/hemoptysis, respectively) under treatment with PAZ. Toxicity was mainly gastrointestinal and manageable with dose reductions. Permanent treatment interruption due to toxicity was necessary in one patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to systematically report survival outcomes for PAZ as a first-line treatment in patients with metastatic EHE. PAZ is active and safe in patients with metastatic EHE and may be considered as an alternative to sirolimus for specific patient subgroups. RECIST criteria should be questioned for evaluation of treatment response in EHE.</p>","PeriodicalId":15118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","volume":"151 4","pages":"150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First-line pazopanib in patients with metastatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: a retrospective single-center analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Anton Burkhard-Meier, Vera Valerie Rechenauer, Vindi Jurinovic, Markus Albertsmeier, Michael Hoberger, Hans Roland Dürr, Alexander Klein, Thomas Knösel, Wolfgang G Kunz, Andreas Mock, Ada Pusztai, Michael Völkl, Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon, Lars H Lindner, Dorit Di Gioia, Luc M Berclaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00432-025-06208-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) represents an ultra-rare, translocated vascular sarcoma with a heterogeneous course of disease. The optimal systemic treatment for patients with advanced EHE remains unclear. We sought to evaluate the value of pazopanib (PAZ) as a first-line treatment in metastatic EHE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen patients with metastatic EHE and PAZ as a first-line treatment at our institution between 2012 und 2023 were reviewed and analyzed with regard to clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At a median follow-up of 51.4 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 35.1 and 53.8 months, respectively. In patients with documented prior tumor progression (n = 10), the median PFS and OS were 12.6 and 105 months, respectively. In patients with serosal effusion/ systemic symptoms (n = 4), the median PFS and OS were 6.1 and 10.3 months. The clinical benefit rate of the overall cohort was 62% with no complete or partial responses. Two of four patients experienced a reduction of symptoms (pain and ascites reduction/hemoptysis, respectively) under treatment with PAZ. Toxicity was mainly gastrointestinal and manageable with dose reductions. Permanent treatment interruption due to toxicity was necessary in one patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to systematically report survival outcomes for PAZ as a first-line treatment in patients with metastatic EHE. PAZ is active and safe in patients with metastatic EHE and may be considered as an alternative to sirolimus for specific patient subgroups. RECIST criteria should be questioned for evaluation of treatment response in EHE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"151 4\",\"pages\":\"150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033179/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06208-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06208-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
First-line pazopanib in patients with metastatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: a retrospective single-center analysis.
Purpose: Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) represents an ultra-rare, translocated vascular sarcoma with a heterogeneous course of disease. The optimal systemic treatment for patients with advanced EHE remains unclear. We sought to evaluate the value of pazopanib (PAZ) as a first-line treatment in metastatic EHE.
Methods: Thirteen patients with metastatic EHE and PAZ as a first-line treatment at our institution between 2012 und 2023 were reviewed and analyzed with regard to clinical outcomes.
Results: At a median follow-up of 51.4 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 35.1 and 53.8 months, respectively. In patients with documented prior tumor progression (n = 10), the median PFS and OS were 12.6 and 105 months, respectively. In patients with serosal effusion/ systemic symptoms (n = 4), the median PFS and OS were 6.1 and 10.3 months. The clinical benefit rate of the overall cohort was 62% with no complete or partial responses. Two of four patients experienced a reduction of symptoms (pain and ascites reduction/hemoptysis, respectively) under treatment with PAZ. Toxicity was mainly gastrointestinal and manageable with dose reductions. Permanent treatment interruption due to toxicity was necessary in one patient.
Conclusion: This is the first study to systematically report survival outcomes for PAZ as a first-line treatment in patients with metastatic EHE. PAZ is active and safe in patients with metastatic EHE and may be considered as an alternative to sirolimus for specific patient subgroups. RECIST criteria should be questioned for evaluation of treatment response in EHE.
期刊介绍:
The "Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology" publishes significant and up-to-date articles within the fields of experimental and clinical oncology. The journal, which is chiefly devoted to Original papers, also includes Reviews as well as Editorials and Guest editorials on current, controversial topics. The section Letters to the editors provides a forum for a rapid exchange of comments and information concerning previously published papers and topics of current interest. Meeting reports provide current information on the latest results presented at important congresses.
The following fields are covered: carcinogenesis - etiology, mechanisms; molecular biology; recent developments in tumor therapy; general diagnosis; laboratory diagnosis; diagnostic and experimental pathology; oncologic surgery; and epidemiology.