{"title":"腰椎微椎间盘切除术与开放式椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的成功率及并发症比较分析。","authors":"Zahid Khan, Seema Sharafat, Haider Ali","doi":"10.12669/pjms.41.4.10620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the success rates and complications associated with lumbar microdiscectomy compared to open discectomy from a tertiary care hospital perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted at the Neurosurgery Department of Lady Reading Hospital over four years (January 2020 to December 2023). Inclusion criteria comprised patients of all genders and ages who underwent single-level lumbar microdiscectomy or open discectomy. Exclusion criteria encompassed patients who underwent redo surgeries, or had incomplete data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study, 396 patients were enrolled, with 153 undergoing open discectomy and 243 undergoing microdiscectomy. The mean age of the participants was 40.42±11.49 years. Noteworthy findings from the analysis include that the success rates were 77.8% for open discectomy and 86.8% for microdiscectomy (p=0.050), while complications, specifically discitis, occurred in 2.6% of open discectomy patients and 0.4% of microdiscectomy patients (p=0.025).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Microdiscectomy exhibited higher success rates and lower complication rates than open discectomy for single-level lumbar disc herniation, underscoring its potential as a preferred surgical intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":19958,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"41 4","pages":"992-996"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022589/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of success rates and complications between lumbar microdiscectomy and open discectomy for lumbar disc herniation.\",\"authors\":\"Zahid Khan, Seema Sharafat, Haider Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.12669/pjms.41.4.10620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the success rates and complications associated with lumbar microdiscectomy compared to open discectomy from a tertiary care hospital perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted at the Neurosurgery Department of Lady Reading Hospital over four years (January 2020 to December 2023). Inclusion criteria comprised patients of all genders and ages who underwent single-level lumbar microdiscectomy or open discectomy. Exclusion criteria encompassed patients who underwent redo surgeries, or had incomplete data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study, 396 patients were enrolled, with 153 undergoing open discectomy and 243 undergoing microdiscectomy. The mean age of the participants was 40.42±11.49 years. Noteworthy findings from the analysis include that the success rates were 77.8% for open discectomy and 86.8% for microdiscectomy (p=0.050), while complications, specifically discitis, occurred in 2.6% of open discectomy patients and 0.4% of microdiscectomy patients (p=0.025).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Microdiscectomy exhibited higher success rates and lower complication rates than open discectomy for single-level lumbar disc herniation, underscoring its potential as a preferred surgical intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"41 4\",\"pages\":\"992-996\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022589/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.41.4.10620\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.41.4.10620","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative analysis of success rates and complications between lumbar microdiscectomy and open discectomy for lumbar disc herniation.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the success rates and complications associated with lumbar microdiscectomy compared to open discectomy from a tertiary care hospital perspective.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted at the Neurosurgery Department of Lady Reading Hospital over four years (January 2020 to December 2023). Inclusion criteria comprised patients of all genders and ages who underwent single-level lumbar microdiscectomy or open discectomy. Exclusion criteria encompassed patients who underwent redo surgeries, or had incomplete data.
Results: In the study, 396 patients were enrolled, with 153 undergoing open discectomy and 243 undergoing microdiscectomy. The mean age of the participants was 40.42±11.49 years. Noteworthy findings from the analysis include that the success rates were 77.8% for open discectomy and 86.8% for microdiscectomy (p=0.050), while complications, specifically discitis, occurred in 2.6% of open discectomy patients and 0.4% of microdiscectomy patients (p=0.025).
Conclusion: Microdiscectomy exhibited higher success rates and lower complication rates than open discectomy for single-level lumbar disc herniation, underscoring its potential as a preferred surgical intervention.
期刊介绍:
It is a peer reviewed medical journal published regularly since 1984. It was previously known as quarterly "SPECIALIST" till December 31st 1999. It publishes original research articles, review articles, current practices, short communications & case reports. It attracts manuscripts not only from within Pakistan but also from over fifty countries from abroad.
Copies of PJMS are sent to all the import medical libraries all over Pakistan and overseas particularly in South East Asia and Asia Pacific besides WHO EMRO Region countries. Eminent members of the medical profession at home and abroad regularly contribute their write-ups, manuscripts in our publications. We pursue an independent editorial policy, which allows an opportunity to the healthcare professionals to express their views without any fear or favour. That is why many opinion makers among the medical and pharmaceutical profession use this publication to communicate their viewpoint.