“药学技能实验室近同行教师经验评价”。

IF 3.8 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Chelsea M. Baker , Mark Joe Schopper , Colleen A. Clark Dula , Jamie L. Woodyard , Deanna Tran , Hyunuk Seung , Jessica M. Bergsbaken , Lucio R. Volino , Sarah E. Vordenberg
{"title":"“药学技能实验室近同行教师经验评价”。","authors":"Chelsea M. Baker ,&nbsp;Mark Joe Schopper ,&nbsp;Colleen A. Clark Dula ,&nbsp;Jamie L. Woodyard ,&nbsp;Deanna Tran ,&nbsp;Hyunuk Seung ,&nbsp;Jessica M. Bergsbaken ,&nbsp;Lucio R. Volino ,&nbsp;Sarah E. Vordenberg","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Near-peer education (NPE) describes senior trainees, or near-peer teachers (NPTs), educating junior trainees, or near-peer learners (NPLs). This study describes the roles and types of NPE activities that NPTs support in pharmacy skills labs and NPT perception of their role and participation in NPE activities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 19-item survey-based study was distributed to individuals who served as NPTs during Fall 2022 at 6 institutions in the Big Ten Academic Alliance. Survey responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and associations between variables were assessed with χ<sup>2</sup> and Fisher’s exact tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 98 of 237 NPTs (<em>n</em> = 54 students; <em>n</em> = 43 postgraduate trainees) were included in the final analysis. The most frequently reported instructional experience was answering questions (<em>n</em> = 91, 92.9%). Student pharmacist NPTs were more likely to report demonstrating skills. Postgraduate trainees were more likely to report facilitating labs as the main instructor and grading simulations, clinical documentation, participation, or practical examinations. Student pharmacists NPTs were more likely to agree that instructional videos were helpful for preparation for NPE, while postgraduate trainees more often agreed that specialized training (eg, teaching certificates) was helpful. The most commonly reported benefits of the NPT experience were improved teaching skills and development (97.9%) and opportunity for teaching experiences (96.9%); while the most frequently reported challenges included increased workload (55.7%) and time constraints (53.6%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>NPTs participate in a variety of instruction and assessment activities in skills labs. More studies are needed to further identify how to most appropriately incorporate NPTs into pharmacy skills lab settings to enhance their education and support class activities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":"89 6","pages":"Article 101413"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Near-Peer Teacher Experience Within Pharmacy Skills Laboratories\",\"authors\":\"Chelsea M. Baker ,&nbsp;Mark Joe Schopper ,&nbsp;Colleen A. Clark Dula ,&nbsp;Jamie L. Woodyard ,&nbsp;Deanna Tran ,&nbsp;Hyunuk Seung ,&nbsp;Jessica M. Bergsbaken ,&nbsp;Lucio R. Volino ,&nbsp;Sarah E. Vordenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Near-peer education (NPE) describes senior trainees, or near-peer teachers (NPTs), educating junior trainees, or near-peer learners (NPLs). This study describes the roles and types of NPE activities that NPTs support in pharmacy skills labs and NPT perception of their role and participation in NPE activities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 19-item survey-based study was distributed to individuals who served as NPTs during Fall 2022 at 6 institutions in the Big Ten Academic Alliance. Survey responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and associations between variables were assessed with χ<sup>2</sup> and Fisher’s exact tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 98 of 237 NPTs (<em>n</em> = 54 students; <em>n</em> = 43 postgraduate trainees) were included in the final analysis. The most frequently reported instructional experience was answering questions (<em>n</em> = 91, 92.9%). Student pharmacist NPTs were more likely to report demonstrating skills. Postgraduate trainees were more likely to report facilitating labs as the main instructor and grading simulations, clinical documentation, participation, or practical examinations. Student pharmacists NPTs were more likely to agree that instructional videos were helpful for preparation for NPE, while postgraduate trainees more often agreed that specialized training (eg, teaching certificates) was helpful. The most commonly reported benefits of the NPT experience were improved teaching skills and development (97.9%) and opportunity for teaching experiences (96.9%); while the most frequently reported challenges included increased workload (55.7%) and time constraints (53.6%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>NPTs participate in a variety of instruction and assessment activities in skills labs. More studies are needed to further identify how to most appropriately incorporate NPTs into pharmacy skills lab settings to enhance their education and support class activities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"volume\":\"89 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 101413\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945925000580\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002945925000580","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:近同伴教育(NPE)描述高级受训人员,或近同伴教师(NPTs),教育初级受训人员,或近同伴学习者(NPLs)。本研究描述了NPT在药学技能实验室中支持的NPE活动的角色和类型,以及NPT对其角色和参与NPE活动的看法。方法:对十大学术联盟的六个机构在2022年秋季担任npt的个人进行了一项19项基于调查的研究。使用描述性统计分析调查结果,使用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验评估变量之间的相关性。结果:237名NPTs (n=54名学生)中有98名;N =43名研究生学员)纳入最终分析。最常见的教学经历是回答问题(n=91, 92.9%)。学生药剂师npt更有可能报告展示技能。研究生更有可能报告促进实验室作为主要讲师和评分模拟,临床文件,参与,或实践考试。学生药剂师npt更倾向于认为教学视频对NPE的准备有帮助,而研究生更倾向于认为专业培训(如教学证书)有帮助。NPT经验最常见的好处是提高了教学技能和发展(97.9%),增加了教学经验(96.9%);而最常见的挑战包括工作量增加(55.7%)和时间限制(53.6%)。结论:npt参与技能实验室的各种指导和评估活动。需要更多的研究来进一步确定如何最适当地将npt纳入药学技能实验室环境,以加强他们的教育和支持课堂活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Near-Peer Teacher Experience Within Pharmacy Skills Laboratories

Objective

Near-peer education (NPE) describes senior trainees, or near-peer teachers (NPTs), educating junior trainees, or near-peer learners (NPLs). This study describes the roles and types of NPE activities that NPTs support in pharmacy skills labs and NPT perception of their role and participation in NPE activities.

Methods

A 19-item survey-based study was distributed to individuals who served as NPTs during Fall 2022 at 6 institutions in the Big Ten Academic Alliance. Survey responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and associations between variables were assessed with χ2 and Fisher’s exact tests.

Results

In total, 98 of 237 NPTs (n = 54 students; n = 43 postgraduate trainees) were included in the final analysis. The most frequently reported instructional experience was answering questions (n = 91, 92.9%). Student pharmacist NPTs were more likely to report demonstrating skills. Postgraduate trainees were more likely to report facilitating labs as the main instructor and grading simulations, clinical documentation, participation, or practical examinations. Student pharmacists NPTs were more likely to agree that instructional videos were helpful for preparation for NPE, while postgraduate trainees more often agreed that specialized training (eg, teaching certificates) was helpful. The most commonly reported benefits of the NPT experience were improved teaching skills and development (97.9%) and opportunity for teaching experiences (96.9%); while the most frequently reported challenges included increased workload (55.7%) and time constraints (53.6%).

Conclusion

NPTs participate in a variety of instruction and assessment activities in skills labs. More studies are needed to further identify how to most appropriately incorporate NPTs into pharmacy skills lab settings to enhance their education and support class activities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信