莫诺匹拉韦对COVID-19高危门诊患者有效性和安全性的上市后监测研究:一项前瞻性病例系列研究

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Renato Ferreira-da-Silva, Lurdes Silva, Cristina Costa-Santos, Manuela Morato, Jorge Junqueira Polónia, Inês Ribeiro-Vaz, Manuela Pinto, Marta Pereira, Inês Marques Figueira, Sofia Baptista, Helena Farinha, Fátima Falcão, Ana Mirco, Liliana Calixto, Madalena Melo
{"title":"莫诺匹拉韦对COVID-19高危门诊患者有效性和安全性的上市后监测研究:一项前瞻性病例系列研究","authors":"Renato Ferreira-da-Silva, Lurdes Silva, Cristina Costa-Santos, Manuela Morato, Jorge Junqueira Polónia, Inês Ribeiro-Vaz, Manuela Pinto, Marta Pereira, Inês Marques Figueira, Sofia Baptista, Helena Farinha, Fátima Falcão, Ana Mirco, Liliana Calixto, Madalena Melo","doi":"10.1007/s43440-025-00729-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Molnupiravir, approved for treating mild to moderate COVID-19 in adults, aims to reduce hospitalisation and mortality rates. Although it was withdrawn from the market after the present study was conducted, understanding its long-term effects remains pertinent. We aimed to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of molnupiravir in high-risk COVID-19 outpatients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, multicenter, noninterventional, postmarketing cohort study enrolled high-risk COVID-19 outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19, eligible under national prescribing criteria, who initiated molnupiravir within five days of symptom onset and were ineligible for first-line antiviral therapy. Patients were consecutively enrolled from eight Portuguese study sites and monitored for three months. Effectiveness was assessed by all-cause mortality and hospitalisation through day 29. Safety was evaluated by the incidence, severity, and causality of adverse events (AE), coded using MedDRA terminology and assessed via the WHO-UMC system. Data were collected through structured patient questionnaires and electronic health records. Statistical analysis was descriptive; proportions were reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and comparisons between groups were performed using appropriate statistical tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By day 29 post-treatment initiation, no deaths were reported (n = 0; 0%; 95%CI = [0,26]), and all patients were either at home or institutionalised, with favourable outcomes. Out of the 12 patients enrolled, eight (67%; 95%CI = [35,90]) reported at least one AE, with the median time to the first AE being five days (range 5-7 days). Half of the patients (n = 6; 95%CI = [21,79]) reported AE deemed possibly or probably related to molnupiravir, involving nausea (25%), dizziness (17%), bitter taste (17%), and headache (17%). These AE were more commonly observed in older individuals and those overweight, indicating a potential influence of these factors on AE occurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Molnupiravir appears to show good safety and effectiveness, offering an alternative for high-risk COVID-19 outpatients ineligible for first-line therapy. Despite its market withdrawal, ongoing research into its long-term effects is crucial to potentially repurpose it for other viral infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":19947,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-marketing surveillance study on the effectiveness and safety of molnupiravir in high-risk COVID-19 outpatients: a prospective case series study.\",\"authors\":\"Renato Ferreira-da-Silva, Lurdes Silva, Cristina Costa-Santos, Manuela Morato, Jorge Junqueira Polónia, Inês Ribeiro-Vaz, Manuela Pinto, Marta Pereira, Inês Marques Figueira, Sofia Baptista, Helena Farinha, Fátima Falcão, Ana Mirco, Liliana Calixto, Madalena Melo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43440-025-00729-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Molnupiravir, approved for treating mild to moderate COVID-19 in adults, aims to reduce hospitalisation and mortality rates. Although it was withdrawn from the market after the present study was conducted, understanding its long-term effects remains pertinent. We aimed to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of molnupiravir in high-risk COVID-19 outpatients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, multicenter, noninterventional, postmarketing cohort study enrolled high-risk COVID-19 outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19, eligible under national prescribing criteria, who initiated molnupiravir within five days of symptom onset and were ineligible for first-line antiviral therapy. Patients were consecutively enrolled from eight Portuguese study sites and monitored for three months. Effectiveness was assessed by all-cause mortality and hospitalisation through day 29. Safety was evaluated by the incidence, severity, and causality of adverse events (AE), coded using MedDRA terminology and assessed via the WHO-UMC system. Data were collected through structured patient questionnaires and electronic health records. Statistical analysis was descriptive; proportions were reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and comparisons between groups were performed using appropriate statistical tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By day 29 post-treatment initiation, no deaths were reported (n = 0; 0%; 95%CI = [0,26]), and all patients were either at home or institutionalised, with favourable outcomes. Out of the 12 patients enrolled, eight (67%; 95%CI = [35,90]) reported at least one AE, with the median time to the first AE being five days (range 5-7 days). Half of the patients (n = 6; 95%CI = [21,79]) reported AE deemed possibly or probably related to molnupiravir, involving nausea (25%), dizziness (17%), bitter taste (17%), and headache (17%). These AE were more commonly observed in older individuals and those overweight, indicating a potential influence of these factors on AE occurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Molnupiravir appears to show good safety and effectiveness, offering an alternative for high-risk COVID-19 outpatients ineligible for first-line therapy. Despite its market withdrawal, ongoing research into its long-term effects is crucial to potentially repurpose it for other viral infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacological Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacological Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43440-025-00729-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43440-025-00729-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Molnupiravir被批准用于治疗成人轻中度COVID-19,旨在降低住院率和死亡率。虽然在本研究进行后,它已退出市场,但了解其长期影响仍然是有意义的。我们的目的是评估莫诺匹拉韦在COVID-19高危门诊患者中的实际有效性和安全性。方法:这项前瞻性、多中心、非介入性、上市后队列研究纳入了符合国家处方标准的轻至中度COVID-19高危门诊患者,这些患者在症状出现5天内开始使用莫努比拉韦,不符合一线抗病毒治疗的条件。患者从葡萄牙8个研究地点连续入组,监测3个月。通过29天的全因死亡率和住院率来评估有效性。安全性通过不良事件(AE)的发生率、严重程度和因果关系进行评估,使用MedDRA术语进行编码,并通过WHO-UMC系统进行评估。通过结构化的患者问卷和电子健康记录收集数据。统计分析是描述性的;以95%置信区间(CI)报告比例,并使用适当的统计检验进行组间比较。结果:治疗开始后第29天,无死亡报告(n = 0;0%;95%CI =[0,26]),所有患者都在家中或机构接受治疗,结果良好。在入组的12例患者中,8例(67%;95%CI =[35,90])报告了至少一次AE,到第一次AE的中位时间为5天(范围为5-7天)。一半的患者(n = 6;95%CI =[21,79])报告的AE被认为可能或可能与molnupiravir有关,包括恶心(25%)、头晕(17%)、苦味(17%)和头痛(17%)。这些AE在老年人和超重人群中更为常见,表明这些因素对AE的发生有潜在的影响。结论:莫努匹拉韦具有良好的安全性和有效性,为不符合一线治疗条件的高危COVID-19门诊患者提供了另一种选择。尽管它退出了市场,但正在进行的对其长期影响的研究对于将其重新用于其他病毒感染至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Post-marketing surveillance study on the effectiveness and safety of molnupiravir in high-risk COVID-19 outpatients: a prospective case series study.

Background: Molnupiravir, approved for treating mild to moderate COVID-19 in adults, aims to reduce hospitalisation and mortality rates. Although it was withdrawn from the market after the present study was conducted, understanding its long-term effects remains pertinent. We aimed to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of molnupiravir in high-risk COVID-19 outpatients.

Methods: This prospective, multicenter, noninterventional, postmarketing cohort study enrolled high-risk COVID-19 outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19, eligible under national prescribing criteria, who initiated molnupiravir within five days of symptom onset and were ineligible for first-line antiviral therapy. Patients were consecutively enrolled from eight Portuguese study sites and monitored for three months. Effectiveness was assessed by all-cause mortality and hospitalisation through day 29. Safety was evaluated by the incidence, severity, and causality of adverse events (AE), coded using MedDRA terminology and assessed via the WHO-UMC system. Data were collected through structured patient questionnaires and electronic health records. Statistical analysis was descriptive; proportions were reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI), and comparisons between groups were performed using appropriate statistical tests.

Results: By day 29 post-treatment initiation, no deaths were reported (n = 0; 0%; 95%CI = [0,26]), and all patients were either at home or institutionalised, with favourable outcomes. Out of the 12 patients enrolled, eight (67%; 95%CI = [35,90]) reported at least one AE, with the median time to the first AE being five days (range 5-7 days). Half of the patients (n = 6; 95%CI = [21,79]) reported AE deemed possibly or probably related to molnupiravir, involving nausea (25%), dizziness (17%), bitter taste (17%), and headache (17%). These AE were more commonly observed in older individuals and those overweight, indicating a potential influence of these factors on AE occurrence.

Conclusions: Molnupiravir appears to show good safety and effectiveness, offering an alternative for high-risk COVID-19 outpatients ineligible for first-line therapy. Despite its market withdrawal, ongoing research into its long-term effects is crucial to potentially repurpose it for other viral infections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacological Reports
Pharmacological Reports 医学-药学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Pharmacological Reports publishes articles concerning all aspects of pharmacology, dealing with the action of drugs at a cellular and molecular level, and papers on the relationship between molecular structure and biological activity as well as reports on compounds with well-defined chemical structures. Pharmacological Reports is an open forum to disseminate recent developments in: pharmacology, behavioural brain research, evidence-based complementary biochemical pharmacology, medicinal chemistry and biochemistry, drug discovery, neuro-psychopharmacology and biological psychiatry, neuroscience and neuropharmacology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, molecular biology, cell biology, toxicology. Studies of plant extracts are not suitable for Pharmacological Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信