日本人群中接受吉西他滨和nab -紫杉醇联合治疗的不可切除胰腺癌患者间质性肺病发病率的系统评价和荟萃分析

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-15 Epub Date: 2025-04-12 DOI:10.2169/internalmedicine.5084-24
Rei Ohira, Rei Suzuki, Hiroyuki Asama, Mitsuru Sugimoto, Kentaro Sato, Hiroshi Shimizu, Tadayuki Takagi, Takuto Hikichi, Jun Nakamura, Tsunetaka Kato, Takumi Yanagita, Hiromasa Ohira
{"title":"日本人群中接受吉西他滨和nab -紫杉醇联合治疗的不可切除胰腺癌患者间质性肺病发病率的系统评价和荟萃分析","authors":"Rei Ohira, Rei Suzuki, Hiroyuki Asama, Mitsuru Sugimoto, Kentaro Sato, Hiroshi Shimizu, Tadayuki Takagi, Takuto Hikichi, Jun Nakamura, Tsunetaka Kato, Takumi Yanagita, Hiromasa Ohira","doi":"10.2169/internalmedicine.5084-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DI-ILD) is an adverse effect of the combination of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP) treatment that has raised concerns because the incidence rate of DI-ILD in the real world is higher than that reported in initial clinical trials. The present study assessed the cumulative incidence rate of DI-ILD among patients treated with GnP based on previously published studies and explored any potential bias in the results. Methods We conducted a meta-analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from 2013 to 2024, using specific keywords. Randomized controlled trials, prospective studies, retrospective studies, and case-control studies that reported the incidence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) among patients treated with GnP were included. Two reviewers independently extracted the data from the included studies. Results Nine studies involving 1,980 patients were included in this analysis. Nine studies were conducted in Japan. The pooled incidence of DI-ILD was 5.9%. A subgroup analysis revealed that smaller studies reported higher incidence rates (≤200 vs. ≥201 cases: 9.4% vs. 4.1%). There was significant heterogeneity and publication bias, suggesting that the variability in incidence rates was due to the study size and potential biases. Conclusion The pooled incidence of ILD among patients treated with GnP was 5.9%. However, the results should be interpreted with caution because of the heterogeneity and publication bias. Further global studies are required to determine the true incidence of ILD.</p>","PeriodicalId":13719,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2928-2933"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of the Incidence Rate of Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Gemcitabine and Nab-paclitaxel Combination Therapy in the Japanese Population.\",\"authors\":\"Rei Ohira, Rei Suzuki, Hiroyuki Asama, Mitsuru Sugimoto, Kentaro Sato, Hiroshi Shimizu, Tadayuki Takagi, Takuto Hikichi, Jun Nakamura, Tsunetaka Kato, Takumi Yanagita, Hiromasa Ohira\",\"doi\":\"10.2169/internalmedicine.5084-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DI-ILD) is an adverse effect of the combination of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP) treatment that has raised concerns because the incidence rate of DI-ILD in the real world is higher than that reported in initial clinical trials. The present study assessed the cumulative incidence rate of DI-ILD among patients treated with GnP based on previously published studies and explored any potential bias in the results. Methods We conducted a meta-analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from 2013 to 2024, using specific keywords. Randomized controlled trials, prospective studies, retrospective studies, and case-control studies that reported the incidence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) among patients treated with GnP were included. Two reviewers independently extracted the data from the included studies. Results Nine studies involving 1,980 patients were included in this analysis. Nine studies were conducted in Japan. The pooled incidence of DI-ILD was 5.9%. A subgroup analysis revealed that smaller studies reported higher incidence rates (≤200 vs. ≥201 cases: 9.4% vs. 4.1%). There was significant heterogeneity and publication bias, suggesting that the variability in incidence rates was due to the study size and potential biases. Conclusion The pooled incidence of ILD among patients treated with GnP was 5.9%. However, the results should be interpreted with caution because of the heterogeneity and publication bias. Further global studies are required to determine the true incidence of ILD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2928-2933\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.5084-24\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.5084-24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

药物性间质性肺病(DI-ILD)是吉西他滨和nab-紫杉醇(GnP)联合治疗的不良反应,由于DI-ILD在现实世界中的发病率高于初步临床试验中报道的发病率,因此引起了人们的关注。本研究基于先前发表的研究评估了接受GnP治疗的患者中DI-ILD的累积发病率,并探讨了结果中可能存在的偏倚。方法按照PRISMA指南进行meta分析。检索2013年至2024年的MEDLINE、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆数据库,使用特定关键词。随机对照试验、前瞻性研究、回顾性研究和病例对照研究均报道了接受大剂量肺治疗的患者间质性肺疾病(ILD)的发生率。两位审稿人独立地从纳入的研究中提取数据。结果本分析纳入了9项研究,涉及1980例患者。在日本进行了九项研究。DI-ILD的总发病率为5.9%。亚组分析显示,较小的研究报告的发病率较高(≤200例vs≥201例:9.4% vs 4.1%)。有显著的异质性和发表偏倚,表明发病率的变异性是由于研究规模和潜在的偏倚。结论应用国产萘治疗的患者ILD的总发生率为5.9%。然而,由于异质性和发表偏倚,结果应谨慎解释。需要进一步的全球研究来确定ILD的真实发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of the Incidence Rate of Interstitial Lung Disease in Patients with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Gemcitabine and Nab-paclitaxel Combination Therapy in the Japanese Population.

Objective Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DI-ILD) is an adverse effect of the combination of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP) treatment that has raised concerns because the incidence rate of DI-ILD in the real world is higher than that reported in initial clinical trials. The present study assessed the cumulative incidence rate of DI-ILD among patients treated with GnP based on previously published studies and explored any potential bias in the results. Methods We conducted a meta-analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from 2013 to 2024, using specific keywords. Randomized controlled trials, prospective studies, retrospective studies, and case-control studies that reported the incidence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) among patients treated with GnP were included. Two reviewers independently extracted the data from the included studies. Results Nine studies involving 1,980 patients were included in this analysis. Nine studies were conducted in Japan. The pooled incidence of DI-ILD was 5.9%. A subgroup analysis revealed that smaller studies reported higher incidence rates (≤200 vs. ≥201 cases: 9.4% vs. 4.1%). There was significant heterogeneity and publication bias, suggesting that the variability in incidence rates was due to the study size and potential biases. Conclusion The pooled incidence of ILD among patients treated with GnP was 5.9%. However, the results should be interpreted with caution because of the heterogeneity and publication bias. Further global studies are required to determine the true incidence of ILD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internal Medicine
Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Internal Medicine is an open-access online only journal published monthly by the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine. Articles must be prepared in accordance with "The Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (see Annals of Internal Medicine 108: 258-265, 1988), must be contributed solely to the Internal Medicine, and become the property of the Japanese Society of Internal Medicine. Statements contained therein are the responsibility of the author(s). The Society reserves copyright and renewal on all published material and such material may not be reproduced in any form without the written permission of the Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信