女性与症状性颈动脉狭窄血运重建术的结果。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Giulio Accarino, Gaetano Lanza, Umberto M Bracale, Jessica Lanza, Giulia Colonna, Maurizio Taurino, Pasqualino Sirignano
{"title":"女性与症状性颈动脉狭窄血运重建术的结果。","authors":"Giulio Accarino, Gaetano Lanza, Umberto M Bracale, Jessica Lanza, Giulia Colonna, Maurizio Taurino, Pasqualino Sirignano","doi":"10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05428-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since stroke continues to be a major worldwide cause of death and disability, its prevention and treatment have become increasingly significant to public health. Up to 20% of all strokes are caused by carotid artery disease (CAD). Carotid revascularization techniques such as carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) are established procedures aimed at reducing stroke risk. Recent studies, while confirming their effectiveness, suggest that women may experience different and sometimes less favorable post-operative outcomes compared to men. These differences stem from factors including anatomy, physiology, hormones, and socioeconomics. Current clinical guidelines rarely include gender-specific recommendations, as women have historically been underrepresented in clinical trials. However, the limited literature on risk assessment for women with CAD highlights significant differences. In this narrative review, we explore the impact of sex-related differences in CAD, outcomes of revascularization, and patterns of diagnosis and referral. We also highlight the gaps hindering personalized medical approaches. We examine the influence of anatomical and physiological variations on procedural risks, analyze hormonal effects on vascular wall physiology, and address metabolic differences between genders. Additionally, we discuss specific perioperative considerations for women and review current guidelines, identifying controversial issues arising from the lack of gender-based evidence. A key objective of this review is to emphasize the importance of research into personalized therapeutic strategies, aiming to improve the understanding of gender-specific influences and ultimately enhance outcomes for women undergoing carotid revascularization.</p>","PeriodicalId":13709,"journal":{"name":"International Angiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Female sex and outcomes of symptomatic carotid stenosis revascularization.\",\"authors\":\"Giulio Accarino, Gaetano Lanza, Umberto M Bracale, Jessica Lanza, Giulia Colonna, Maurizio Taurino, Pasqualino Sirignano\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05428-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Since stroke continues to be a major worldwide cause of death and disability, its prevention and treatment have become increasingly significant to public health. Up to 20% of all strokes are caused by carotid artery disease (CAD). Carotid revascularization techniques such as carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) are established procedures aimed at reducing stroke risk. Recent studies, while confirming their effectiveness, suggest that women may experience different and sometimes less favorable post-operative outcomes compared to men. These differences stem from factors including anatomy, physiology, hormones, and socioeconomics. Current clinical guidelines rarely include gender-specific recommendations, as women have historically been underrepresented in clinical trials. However, the limited literature on risk assessment for women with CAD highlights significant differences. In this narrative review, we explore the impact of sex-related differences in CAD, outcomes of revascularization, and patterns of diagnosis and referral. We also highlight the gaps hindering personalized medical approaches. We examine the influence of anatomical and physiological variations on procedural risks, analyze hormonal effects on vascular wall physiology, and address metabolic differences between genders. Additionally, we discuss specific perioperative considerations for women and review current guidelines, identifying controversial issues arising from the lack of gender-based evidence. A key objective of this review is to emphasize the importance of research into personalized therapeutic strategies, aiming to improve the understanding of gender-specific influences and ultimately enhance outcomes for women undergoing carotid revascularization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Angiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Angiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05428-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05428-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于中风仍然是世界范围内造成死亡和残疾的一个主要原因,因此预防和治疗中风对公共卫生的意义日益重大。高达20%的中风是由颈动脉疾病(CAD)引起的。颈动脉血管重建技术,如颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)是旨在降低卒中风险的既定程序。最近的研究虽然证实了它们的有效性,但表明女性的术后结果可能与男性不同,有时甚至不如男性好。这些差异源于解剖学、生理学、激素和社会经济学等因素。目前的临床指南很少包括针对性别的建议,因为女性在临床试验中的代表性一直不足。然而,关于女性冠心病风险评估的有限文献强调了显著差异。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们探讨了CAD中性别相关差异的影响,血运重建的结果,以及诊断和转诊的模式。我们还强调了阻碍个性化医疗方法的差距。我们研究了解剖和生理变异对手术风险的影响,分析了激素对血管壁生理的影响,并解决了性别之间的代谢差异。此外,我们还讨论了妇女围手术期的具体考虑因素,并回顾了目前的指南,确定了由于缺乏基于性别的证据而引起的争议问题。本综述的一个关键目的是强调个性化治疗策略研究的重要性,旨在提高对性别特异性影响的理解,并最终提高接受颈动脉血管重建术的女性的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Female sex and outcomes of symptomatic carotid stenosis revascularization.

Since stroke continues to be a major worldwide cause of death and disability, its prevention and treatment have become increasingly significant to public health. Up to 20% of all strokes are caused by carotid artery disease (CAD). Carotid revascularization techniques such as carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) are established procedures aimed at reducing stroke risk. Recent studies, while confirming their effectiveness, suggest that women may experience different and sometimes less favorable post-operative outcomes compared to men. These differences stem from factors including anatomy, physiology, hormones, and socioeconomics. Current clinical guidelines rarely include gender-specific recommendations, as women have historically been underrepresented in clinical trials. However, the limited literature on risk assessment for women with CAD highlights significant differences. In this narrative review, we explore the impact of sex-related differences in CAD, outcomes of revascularization, and patterns of diagnosis and referral. We also highlight the gaps hindering personalized medical approaches. We examine the influence of anatomical and physiological variations on procedural risks, analyze hormonal effects on vascular wall physiology, and address metabolic differences between genders. Additionally, we discuss specific perioperative considerations for women and review current guidelines, identifying controversial issues arising from the lack of gender-based evidence. A key objective of this review is to emphasize the importance of research into personalized therapeutic strategies, aiming to improve the understanding of gender-specific influences and ultimately enhance outcomes for women undergoing carotid revascularization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Angiology
International Angiology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
28.60%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Angiology publishes scientific papers on angiology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work. Duties and responsibilities of all the subjects involved in the editorial process are summarized at Publication ethics. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信