{"title":"女性与症状性颈动脉狭窄血运重建术的结果。","authors":"Giulio Accarino, Gaetano Lanza, Umberto M Bracale, Jessica Lanza, Giulia Colonna, Maurizio Taurino, Pasqualino Sirignano","doi":"10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05428-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since stroke continues to be a major worldwide cause of death and disability, its prevention and treatment have become increasingly significant to public health. Up to 20% of all strokes are caused by carotid artery disease (CAD). Carotid revascularization techniques such as carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) are established procedures aimed at reducing stroke risk. Recent studies, while confirming their effectiveness, suggest that women may experience different and sometimes less favorable post-operative outcomes compared to men. These differences stem from factors including anatomy, physiology, hormones, and socioeconomics. Current clinical guidelines rarely include gender-specific recommendations, as women have historically been underrepresented in clinical trials. However, the limited literature on risk assessment for women with CAD highlights significant differences. In this narrative review, we explore the impact of sex-related differences in CAD, outcomes of revascularization, and patterns of diagnosis and referral. We also highlight the gaps hindering personalized medical approaches. We examine the influence of anatomical and physiological variations on procedural risks, analyze hormonal effects on vascular wall physiology, and address metabolic differences between genders. Additionally, we discuss specific perioperative considerations for women and review current guidelines, identifying controversial issues arising from the lack of gender-based evidence. A key objective of this review is to emphasize the importance of research into personalized therapeutic strategies, aiming to improve the understanding of gender-specific influences and ultimately enhance outcomes for women undergoing carotid revascularization.</p>","PeriodicalId":13709,"journal":{"name":"International Angiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Female sex and outcomes of symptomatic carotid stenosis revascularization.\",\"authors\":\"Giulio Accarino, Gaetano Lanza, Umberto M Bracale, Jessica Lanza, Giulia Colonna, Maurizio Taurino, Pasqualino Sirignano\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05428-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Since stroke continues to be a major worldwide cause of death and disability, its prevention and treatment have become increasingly significant to public health. Up to 20% of all strokes are caused by carotid artery disease (CAD). Carotid revascularization techniques such as carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) are established procedures aimed at reducing stroke risk. Recent studies, while confirming their effectiveness, suggest that women may experience different and sometimes less favorable post-operative outcomes compared to men. These differences stem from factors including anatomy, physiology, hormones, and socioeconomics. Current clinical guidelines rarely include gender-specific recommendations, as women have historically been underrepresented in clinical trials. However, the limited literature on risk assessment for women with CAD highlights significant differences. In this narrative review, we explore the impact of sex-related differences in CAD, outcomes of revascularization, and patterns of diagnosis and referral. We also highlight the gaps hindering personalized medical approaches. We examine the influence of anatomical and physiological variations on procedural risks, analyze hormonal effects on vascular wall physiology, and address metabolic differences between genders. Additionally, we discuss specific perioperative considerations for women and review current guidelines, identifying controversial issues arising from the lack of gender-based evidence. A key objective of this review is to emphasize the importance of research into personalized therapeutic strategies, aiming to improve the understanding of gender-specific influences and ultimately enhance outcomes for women undergoing carotid revascularization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Angiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Angiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05428-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Angiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-9590.25.05428-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Female sex and outcomes of symptomatic carotid stenosis revascularization.
Since stroke continues to be a major worldwide cause of death and disability, its prevention and treatment have become increasingly significant to public health. Up to 20% of all strokes are caused by carotid artery disease (CAD). Carotid revascularization techniques such as carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) are established procedures aimed at reducing stroke risk. Recent studies, while confirming their effectiveness, suggest that women may experience different and sometimes less favorable post-operative outcomes compared to men. These differences stem from factors including anatomy, physiology, hormones, and socioeconomics. Current clinical guidelines rarely include gender-specific recommendations, as women have historically been underrepresented in clinical trials. However, the limited literature on risk assessment for women with CAD highlights significant differences. In this narrative review, we explore the impact of sex-related differences in CAD, outcomes of revascularization, and patterns of diagnosis and referral. We also highlight the gaps hindering personalized medical approaches. We examine the influence of anatomical and physiological variations on procedural risks, analyze hormonal effects on vascular wall physiology, and address metabolic differences between genders. Additionally, we discuss specific perioperative considerations for women and review current guidelines, identifying controversial issues arising from the lack of gender-based evidence. A key objective of this review is to emphasize the importance of research into personalized therapeutic strategies, aiming to improve the understanding of gender-specific influences and ultimately enhance outcomes for women undergoing carotid revascularization.
期刊介绍:
International Angiology publishes scientific papers on angiology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work. Duties and responsibilities of all the subjects involved in the editorial process are summarized at Publication ethics. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).