David Ney Gonzalez, Martijn Grinovero, Luca Ponti, Cristina Cova, Valeria Sesana, Marco Franza, Mauro Citterio, Yannick Baschung
{"title":"数字吸入器呼吸治疗:来自多模态实验和体外分析的见解。","authors":"David Ney Gonzalez, Martijn Grinovero, Luca Ponti, Cristina Cova, Valeria Sesana, Marco Franza, Mauro Citterio, Yannick Baschung","doi":"10.1089/jamp.2024.0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The RS01X is a digital dry powder inhaler (DPI) that records inhalation parameters such as technique or adherence. This offers patients and health care providers a way to have a feedback on inhalation treatments. This study used real-life data gained from 28 healthy volunteers for adherence assessment, technique evaluation, and <i>in vitro</i> testing. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The study enrolled 28 healthy volunteers. Participants were shown how to use an inhaler and provided with empty capsules. The inhalers record several inhalation parameters such as peak inspiratory flow (PIF), volume, duration, and orientation. Half of the participants were selected to be in an \"intervention\" group with access to their inhalation data as well as feedback to improve their inhalation. The other half were a \"control\" group without access to their data nor any feedback. The data were then used for <i>in vitro</i> testing. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall, 28 participants were enrolled, and inhalation data were available for 13 interventions and 15 controls. Average adherence was 82.0% and 69.5% for intervention and control, respectively. The technique of inhalation was 65.58% good, 19.89% fair, and 14.53% poor for the intervention group and 36.73% good, 26.99% fair, and 36.28% poor for the control group. The variability of PIF was 9% for intervention and 30% for control. <i>In vitro</i> simulations showed the importance of proper angle orientation in inhalation, which was supported by <i>in vivo</i> data. The fine particle fraction of active pharmaceutical ingredients was similar to the inhalation profile of the intervention in comparison with a theoretical perfect inhalation. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This study results showed clear improvement in inhalation technique and adherence for patients using digital DPI. In addition, <i>in vitro</i> testing provided concrete data illustrating the measurable advancements digitalization offers in enhancing patient adherence and inhalation technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":14940,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","volume":" ","pages":"127-135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Respiratory Therapy with Digital Inhalers: Insights from Multimodal Experimental and <i>In Vitro</i> Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"David Ney Gonzalez, Martijn Grinovero, Luca Ponti, Cristina Cova, Valeria Sesana, Marco Franza, Mauro Citterio, Yannick Baschung\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jamp.2024.0042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The RS01X is a digital dry powder inhaler (DPI) that records inhalation parameters such as technique or adherence. This offers patients and health care providers a way to have a feedback on inhalation treatments. This study used real-life data gained from 28 healthy volunteers for adherence assessment, technique evaluation, and <i>in vitro</i> testing. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The study enrolled 28 healthy volunteers. Participants were shown how to use an inhaler and provided with empty capsules. The inhalers record several inhalation parameters such as peak inspiratory flow (PIF), volume, duration, and orientation. Half of the participants were selected to be in an \\\"intervention\\\" group with access to their inhalation data as well as feedback to improve their inhalation. The other half were a \\\"control\\\" group without access to their data nor any feedback. The data were then used for <i>in vitro</i> testing. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall, 28 participants were enrolled, and inhalation data were available for 13 interventions and 15 controls. Average adherence was 82.0% and 69.5% for intervention and control, respectively. The technique of inhalation was 65.58% good, 19.89% fair, and 14.53% poor for the intervention group and 36.73% good, 26.99% fair, and 36.28% poor for the control group. The variability of PIF was 9% for intervention and 30% for control. <i>In vitro</i> simulations showed the importance of proper angle orientation in inhalation, which was supported by <i>in vivo</i> data. The fine particle fraction of active pharmaceutical ingredients was similar to the inhalation profile of the intervention in comparison with a theoretical perfect inhalation. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This study results showed clear improvement in inhalation technique and adherence for patients using digital DPI. In addition, <i>in vitro</i> testing provided concrete data illustrating the measurable advancements digitalization offers in enhancing patient adherence and inhalation technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"127-135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2024.0042\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2024.0042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Respiratory Therapy with Digital Inhalers: Insights from Multimodal Experimental and In Vitro Analysis.
Background: The RS01X is a digital dry powder inhaler (DPI) that records inhalation parameters such as technique or adherence. This offers patients and health care providers a way to have a feedback on inhalation treatments. This study used real-life data gained from 28 healthy volunteers for adherence assessment, technique evaluation, and in vitro testing. Methods: The study enrolled 28 healthy volunteers. Participants were shown how to use an inhaler and provided with empty capsules. The inhalers record several inhalation parameters such as peak inspiratory flow (PIF), volume, duration, and orientation. Half of the participants were selected to be in an "intervention" group with access to their inhalation data as well as feedback to improve their inhalation. The other half were a "control" group without access to their data nor any feedback. The data were then used for in vitro testing. Results: Overall, 28 participants were enrolled, and inhalation data were available for 13 interventions and 15 controls. Average adherence was 82.0% and 69.5% for intervention and control, respectively. The technique of inhalation was 65.58% good, 19.89% fair, and 14.53% poor for the intervention group and 36.73% good, 26.99% fair, and 36.28% poor for the control group. The variability of PIF was 9% for intervention and 30% for control. In vitro simulations showed the importance of proper angle orientation in inhalation, which was supported by in vivo data. The fine particle fraction of active pharmaceutical ingredients was similar to the inhalation profile of the intervention in comparison with a theoretical perfect inhalation. Conclusion: This study results showed clear improvement in inhalation technique and adherence for patients using digital DPI. In addition, in vitro testing provided concrete data illustrating the measurable advancements digitalization offers in enhancing patient adherence and inhalation technique.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery is the only peer-reviewed journal delivering innovative, authoritative coverage of the health effects of inhaled aerosols and delivery of drugs through the pulmonary system. The Journal is a forum for leading experts, addressing novel topics such as aerosolized chemotherapy, aerosolized vaccines, methods to determine toxicities, and delivery of aerosolized drugs in the intubated patient.
Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery coverage includes:
Pulmonary drug delivery
Airway reactivity and asthma treatment
Inhalation of particles and gases in the respiratory tract
Toxic effects of inhaled agents
Aerosols as tools for studying basic physiologic phenomena.