{"title":"揭露碳成本:英国自由皮瓣重建程序对环境的影响。","authors":"Benjamin Clay, Sandip Hindocha, Kavish Maheshwari","doi":"10.2340/jphs.v60.43375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Free flap reconstruction procedures are renowned for their duration and the requirement for many staff and large quantities of equipment. This single-centre cross-sectional study aimed to quantify the total emissions related to two such procedures carried out at a district general hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap procedure and one anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flap procedure, both carried out in February 2024, were analysed. Data related to staff transport, anaesthetic duration, mass of disposable equipment, quantity of reusable surgical equipment and consumption of electricity and heating for the relevant theatre areas were collected. Emissions were calculated using UK government conversion factors and classified by scope and contributory element as per the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total emissions were estimated at 385.5 kgCO2eq for the DIEP and 369.6 kgCO2eq for the ALT. Scope 1 emissions related to heating, atmospheric release of general anaesthetic and incineration of waste accounted for 33.7% of DIEP emissions and 35.6% of ALT emissions. Scope 2 emissions related to the use of grid electricity accounted for 44.8% of DIEP emissions and 46.7% of ALT emissions. Scope 3 emissions related to staff transport, cleaning of reusable equipment and the supply chain for disposable equipment accounted for 21.5% of DIEP emissions and 17.7% of ALT emissions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant reductions in emissions may be achievable without significant infrastructural changes through initiatives to reduce staff transport by single-occupancy car, improving the energy efficiency of the theatre areas and reducing the use of single-use surgical equipment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery","volume":"60 ","pages":"96-101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncovering the carbon cost: Environmental impact of free flap reconstruction procedures in the UK.\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Clay, Sandip Hindocha, Kavish Maheshwari\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/jphs.v60.43375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Free flap reconstruction procedures are renowned for their duration and the requirement for many staff and large quantities of equipment. This single-centre cross-sectional study aimed to quantify the total emissions related to two such procedures carried out at a district general hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap procedure and one anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flap procedure, both carried out in February 2024, were analysed. Data related to staff transport, anaesthetic duration, mass of disposable equipment, quantity of reusable surgical equipment and consumption of electricity and heating for the relevant theatre areas were collected. Emissions were calculated using UK government conversion factors and classified by scope and contributory element as per the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total emissions were estimated at 385.5 kgCO2eq for the DIEP and 369.6 kgCO2eq for the ALT. Scope 1 emissions related to heating, atmospheric release of general anaesthetic and incineration of waste accounted for 33.7% of DIEP emissions and 35.6% of ALT emissions. Scope 2 emissions related to the use of grid electricity accounted for 44.8% of DIEP emissions and 46.7% of ALT emissions. Scope 3 emissions related to staff transport, cleaning of reusable equipment and the supply chain for disposable equipment accounted for 21.5% of DIEP emissions and 17.7% of ALT emissions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant reductions in emissions may be achievable without significant infrastructural changes through initiatives to reduce staff transport by single-occupancy car, improving the energy efficiency of the theatre areas and reducing the use of single-use surgical equipment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery\",\"volume\":\"60 \",\"pages\":\"96-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/jphs.v60.43375\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jphs.v60.43375","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Uncovering the carbon cost: Environmental impact of free flap reconstruction procedures in the UK.
Introduction: Free flap reconstruction procedures are renowned for their duration and the requirement for many staff and large quantities of equipment. This single-centre cross-sectional study aimed to quantify the total emissions related to two such procedures carried out at a district general hospital.
Methods: One deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap procedure and one anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flap procedure, both carried out in February 2024, were analysed. Data related to staff transport, anaesthetic duration, mass of disposable equipment, quantity of reusable surgical equipment and consumption of electricity and heating for the relevant theatre areas were collected. Emissions were calculated using UK government conversion factors and classified by scope and contributory element as per the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.
Results: Total emissions were estimated at 385.5 kgCO2eq for the DIEP and 369.6 kgCO2eq for the ALT. Scope 1 emissions related to heating, atmospheric release of general anaesthetic and incineration of waste accounted for 33.7% of DIEP emissions and 35.6% of ALT emissions. Scope 2 emissions related to the use of grid electricity accounted for 44.8% of DIEP emissions and 46.7% of ALT emissions. Scope 3 emissions related to staff transport, cleaning of reusable equipment and the supply chain for disposable equipment accounted for 21.5% of DIEP emissions and 17.7% of ALT emissions.
Conclusion: Significant reductions in emissions may be achievable without significant infrastructural changes through initiatives to reduce staff transport by single-occupancy car, improving the energy efficiency of the theatre areas and reducing the use of single-use surgical equipment.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of the Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery is to serve as an international forum for plastic surgery, hand surgery and related research. Interest is focused on original articles on basic research and clinical evaluation.
The scope of the journal comprises:
• Articles concerning operative methods and follow-up studies
• Research articles on subjects related to plastic and hand surgery
• Articles on cranio-maxillofacial surgery, including cleft lip and palate surgery.
Extended issues are published occasionally, dealing with special topics such as microvascular surgery, craniofacial surgery, or burns. Supplements, usually doctoral theses, may also be published.
The journal is published for the Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica society and sponsored by the Key Foundation, Sweden.
The journal was previously published as Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery.