{"title":"关于需要使用适当的指标来检测试验干旱处理。","authors":"Bruno H P Rosado, Ilaine Silveira Matos","doi":"10.1007/s00442-025-05717-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rainfall manipulation experiments are a powerful tool to investigate how drought in isolation or combined with other stresses and disturbance drivers (e.g., fire, herbivory, heatwaves) affects diverse ecological processes. Using passive rainout shelters (intercepting a fixed amount of precipitation) coupled with control plots (receiving ambient precipitation), hundreds of studies have greatly advanced our understanding of drought impacts on plant and soil communities. Despite the existence of guidelines of how to properly design and implement experimental droughts, methodological issues still hinder a correct interpretation of some rainfall manipulation studies. Because of the use of improper metrics to detect drought intensity, it is sometimes unclear whether drought plots really experienced dry conditions and whether control plots experienced near-average mean annual precipitation throughout the experimental period. Here, we reanalyzed three recently published rainfall manipulation studies to illustrate how multi-scalar drought indices (such as SPEI) can be used to better quantify the intensity of the experimental drought imposed and to place it in the historical climate context of each studied area. We also provide additional guidelines to improve the experimental design of future rainfall manipulation studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19473,"journal":{"name":"Oecologia","volume":"207 5","pages":"76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the need to use proper metrics to detect experimental drought treatments.\",\"authors\":\"Bruno H P Rosado, Ilaine Silveira Matos\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00442-025-05717-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rainfall manipulation experiments are a powerful tool to investigate how drought in isolation or combined with other stresses and disturbance drivers (e.g., fire, herbivory, heatwaves) affects diverse ecological processes. Using passive rainout shelters (intercepting a fixed amount of precipitation) coupled with control plots (receiving ambient precipitation), hundreds of studies have greatly advanced our understanding of drought impacts on plant and soil communities. Despite the existence of guidelines of how to properly design and implement experimental droughts, methodological issues still hinder a correct interpretation of some rainfall manipulation studies. Because of the use of improper metrics to detect drought intensity, it is sometimes unclear whether drought plots really experienced dry conditions and whether control plots experienced near-average mean annual precipitation throughout the experimental period. Here, we reanalyzed three recently published rainfall manipulation studies to illustrate how multi-scalar drought indices (such as SPEI) can be used to better quantify the intensity of the experimental drought imposed and to place it in the historical climate context of each studied area. We also provide additional guidelines to improve the experimental design of future rainfall manipulation studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oecologia\",\"volume\":\"207 5\",\"pages\":\"76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oecologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-025-05717-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecologia","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-025-05717-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the need to use proper metrics to detect experimental drought treatments.
Rainfall manipulation experiments are a powerful tool to investigate how drought in isolation or combined with other stresses and disturbance drivers (e.g., fire, herbivory, heatwaves) affects diverse ecological processes. Using passive rainout shelters (intercepting a fixed amount of precipitation) coupled with control plots (receiving ambient precipitation), hundreds of studies have greatly advanced our understanding of drought impacts on plant and soil communities. Despite the existence of guidelines of how to properly design and implement experimental droughts, methodological issues still hinder a correct interpretation of some rainfall manipulation studies. Because of the use of improper metrics to detect drought intensity, it is sometimes unclear whether drought plots really experienced dry conditions and whether control plots experienced near-average mean annual precipitation throughout the experimental period. Here, we reanalyzed three recently published rainfall manipulation studies to illustrate how multi-scalar drought indices (such as SPEI) can be used to better quantify the intensity of the experimental drought imposed and to place it in the historical climate context of each studied area. We also provide additional guidelines to improve the experimental design of future rainfall manipulation studies.
期刊介绍:
Oecologia publishes innovative ecological research of international interest. We seek reviews, advances in methodology, and original contributions, emphasizing the following areas:
Population ecology, Plant-microbe-animal interactions, Ecosystem ecology, Community ecology, Global change ecology, Conservation ecology,
Behavioral ecology and Physiological Ecology.
In general, studies that are purely descriptive, mathematical, documentary, and/or natural history will not be considered.