关于需要使用适当的指标来检测试验干旱处理。

IF 2.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Bruno H P Rosado, Ilaine Silveira Matos
{"title":"关于需要使用适当的指标来检测试验干旱处理。","authors":"Bruno H P Rosado, Ilaine Silveira Matos","doi":"10.1007/s00442-025-05717-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rainfall manipulation experiments are a powerful tool to investigate how drought in isolation or combined with other stresses and disturbance drivers (e.g., fire, herbivory, heatwaves) affects diverse ecological processes. Using passive rainout shelters (intercepting a fixed amount of precipitation) coupled with control plots (receiving ambient precipitation), hundreds of studies have greatly advanced our understanding of drought impacts on plant and soil communities. Despite the existence of guidelines of how to properly design and implement experimental droughts, methodological issues still hinder a correct interpretation of some rainfall manipulation studies. Because of the use of improper metrics to detect drought intensity, it is sometimes unclear whether drought plots really experienced dry conditions and whether control plots experienced near-average mean annual precipitation throughout the experimental period. Here, we reanalyzed three recently published rainfall manipulation studies to illustrate how multi-scalar drought indices (such as SPEI) can be used to better quantify the intensity of the experimental drought imposed and to place it in the historical climate context of each studied area. We also provide additional guidelines to improve the experimental design of future rainfall manipulation studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19473,"journal":{"name":"Oecologia","volume":"207 5","pages":"76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the need to use proper metrics to detect experimental drought treatments.\",\"authors\":\"Bruno H P Rosado, Ilaine Silveira Matos\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00442-025-05717-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rainfall manipulation experiments are a powerful tool to investigate how drought in isolation or combined with other stresses and disturbance drivers (e.g., fire, herbivory, heatwaves) affects diverse ecological processes. Using passive rainout shelters (intercepting a fixed amount of precipitation) coupled with control plots (receiving ambient precipitation), hundreds of studies have greatly advanced our understanding of drought impacts on plant and soil communities. Despite the existence of guidelines of how to properly design and implement experimental droughts, methodological issues still hinder a correct interpretation of some rainfall manipulation studies. Because of the use of improper metrics to detect drought intensity, it is sometimes unclear whether drought plots really experienced dry conditions and whether control plots experienced near-average mean annual precipitation throughout the experimental period. Here, we reanalyzed three recently published rainfall manipulation studies to illustrate how multi-scalar drought indices (such as SPEI) can be used to better quantify the intensity of the experimental drought imposed and to place it in the historical climate context of each studied area. We also provide additional guidelines to improve the experimental design of future rainfall manipulation studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oecologia\",\"volume\":\"207 5\",\"pages\":\"76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oecologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-025-05717-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecologia","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-025-05717-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

降雨操纵实验是研究干旱如何单独或与其他压力和干扰驱动因素(如火灾、草食、热浪)相结合影响各种生态过程的有力工具。利用被动雨棚(拦截固定数量的降水)与控制地块(接收周围降水)相结合,数百项研究极大地提高了我们对干旱对植物和土壤群落影响的理解。尽管存在如何正确设计和实施实验性干旱的指导方针,但方法问题仍然阻碍了对一些降雨操纵研究的正确解释。由于使用了不恰当的指标来检测干旱强度,有时不清楚干旱地块是否真的经历了干旱条件,以及对照地块在整个试验期间是否经历了接近平均年降水量的情况。在这里,我们重新分析了最近发表的三个降雨操纵研究,以说明如何使用多标量干旱指数(如SPEI)来更好地量化实验干旱的强度,并将其置于每个研究地区的历史气候背景中。我们还提供了额外的指导方针,以改进未来降雨操纵研究的实验设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the need to use proper metrics to detect experimental drought treatments.

Rainfall manipulation experiments are a powerful tool to investigate how drought in isolation or combined with other stresses and disturbance drivers (e.g., fire, herbivory, heatwaves) affects diverse ecological processes. Using passive rainout shelters (intercepting a fixed amount of precipitation) coupled with control plots (receiving ambient precipitation), hundreds of studies have greatly advanced our understanding of drought impacts on plant and soil communities. Despite the existence of guidelines of how to properly design and implement experimental droughts, methodological issues still hinder a correct interpretation of some rainfall manipulation studies. Because of the use of improper metrics to detect drought intensity, it is sometimes unclear whether drought plots really experienced dry conditions and whether control plots experienced near-average mean annual precipitation throughout the experimental period. Here, we reanalyzed three recently published rainfall manipulation studies to illustrate how multi-scalar drought indices (such as SPEI) can be used to better quantify the intensity of the experimental drought imposed and to place it in the historical climate context of each studied area. We also provide additional guidelines to improve the experimental design of future rainfall manipulation studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oecologia
Oecologia 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Oecologia publishes innovative ecological research of international interest. We seek reviews, advances in methodology, and original contributions, emphasizing the following areas: Population ecology, Plant-microbe-animal interactions, Ecosystem ecology, Community ecology, Global change ecology, Conservation ecology, Behavioral ecology and Physiological Ecology. In general, studies that are purely descriptive, mathematical, documentary, and/or natural history will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信