{"title":"辅助装置对多植入物扫描精度的影响：体外比较研究。","authors":"Mingyue Lyu, Dingyi Xu, Yizhou Li, Shiwen Zhang, Heling Zhao, Quan Yuan","doi":"10.1186/s13005-025-00511-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the influence of a consumable auxiliary device, the O-I buckle, on the accuracy of intraoral scanning among complete arches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A standard mandibular model with six implants was used as the master model and was scanned by a precise dental laboratory scanner to establish a reference. Three impression techniques were compared: the conventional splinted open-tray impression (CI group), the digital intraoral scanning technique (IOS group), and IOS with the auxiliary device (OI group). For OI group, six prefabricated O-I buckles were attached for each intraoral scan body (ISB) and the definite models were scanned 10 times. The STL datasets were imported into a 3D inspection software to obtain the trueness and precision values for three scanning ranges (BCDE, BCDEF, and ABCDEF). The trueness was the absolute value of the root mean square (RMS) between the reference and test models, while precision referred to the value of the test group subtracted from each other. The data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and post hoc multiple comparison tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The impression method (p <.001) and scanning range (p <.001) significantly influenced the trueness and precision of implant impressions for complete edentulous arches. The IOS with O-I buckle showed higher trueness compared to the IOS group for all implant configurations with most being significantly different (p =.758, = 0.04, and = < 0.001 for BCDE, BCDEF, and ABCDEF, respectively) and significantly higher precision was seen in group ABCDEF (p <.001). For four and five implants (group BCDE and BCDEF), there was no significant difference comparing IOS with O-I buckle and CI (p >.05). As the range expanded, the trueness and precision of IOS and OI decreased (p <.05), whereas the accuracy of CI remained stable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The auxiliary O-I buckle fixed to the ISBs significantly improved the multiple-implant intraoral scanning accuracy for digital impressions in complete arches; With CI as a reference, the accuracy of IOS with OI buckles were comparable for four and five implants.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The digitization accuracy of intraoral scanning for complete edentulous arches can be improved through IOS with OI buckles. This may lead to improved passive fit of the restoration, improving patient outcomes in a convenient and cheap way.</p>","PeriodicalId":12994,"journal":{"name":"Head & Face Medicine","volume":"21 1","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036170/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of an auxiliary device on scanning accuracy for multiple implants: an in vitro comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Mingyue Lyu, Dingyi Xu, Yizhou Li, Shiwen Zhang, Heling Zhao, Quan Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13005-025-00511-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the influence of a consumable auxiliary device, the O-I buckle, on the accuracy of intraoral scanning among complete arches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A standard mandibular model with six implants was used as the master model and was scanned by a precise dental laboratory scanner to establish a reference. Three impression techniques were compared: the conventional splinted open-tray impression (CI group), the digital intraoral scanning technique (IOS group), and IOS with the auxiliary device (OI group). For OI group, six prefabricated O-I buckles were attached for each intraoral scan body (ISB) and the definite models were scanned 10 times. The STL datasets were imported into a 3D inspection software to obtain the trueness and precision values for three scanning ranges (BCDE, BCDEF, and ABCDEF). The trueness was the absolute value of the root mean square (RMS) between the reference and test models, while precision referred to the value of the test group subtracted from each other. The data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and post hoc multiple comparison tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The impression method (p <.001) and scanning range (p <.001) significantly influenced the trueness and precision of implant impressions for complete edentulous arches. The IOS with O-I buckle showed higher trueness compared to the IOS group for all implant configurations with most being significantly different (p =.758, = 0.04, and = < 0.001 for BCDE, BCDEF, and ABCDEF, respectively) and significantly higher precision was seen in group ABCDEF (p <.001). For four and five implants (group BCDE and BCDEF), there was no significant difference comparing IOS with O-I buckle and CI (p >.05). As the range expanded, the trueness and precision of IOS and OI decreased (p <.05), whereas the accuracy of CI remained stable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The auxiliary O-I buckle fixed to the ISBs significantly improved the multiple-implant intraoral scanning accuracy for digital impressions in complete arches; With CI as a reference, the accuracy of IOS with OI buckles were comparable for four and five implants.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The digitization accuracy of intraoral scanning for complete edentulous arches can be improved through IOS with OI buckles. This may lead to improved passive fit of the restoration, improving patient outcomes in a convenient and cheap way.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Head & Face Medicine\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036170/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Head & Face Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-025-00511-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head & Face Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-025-00511-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of an auxiliary device on scanning accuracy for multiple implants: an in vitro comparative study.
Objectives: To determine the influence of a consumable auxiliary device, the O-I buckle, on the accuracy of intraoral scanning among complete arches.
Methods: A standard mandibular model with six implants was used as the master model and was scanned by a precise dental laboratory scanner to establish a reference. Three impression techniques were compared: the conventional splinted open-tray impression (CI group), the digital intraoral scanning technique (IOS group), and IOS with the auxiliary device (OI group). For OI group, six prefabricated O-I buckles were attached for each intraoral scan body (ISB) and the definite models were scanned 10 times. The STL datasets were imported into a 3D inspection software to obtain the trueness and precision values for three scanning ranges (BCDE, BCDEF, and ABCDEF). The trueness was the absolute value of the root mean square (RMS) between the reference and test models, while precision referred to the value of the test group subtracted from each other. The data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and post hoc multiple comparison tests.
Results: The impression method (p <.001) and scanning range (p <.001) significantly influenced the trueness and precision of implant impressions for complete edentulous arches. The IOS with O-I buckle showed higher trueness compared to the IOS group for all implant configurations with most being significantly different (p =.758, = 0.04, and = < 0.001 for BCDE, BCDEF, and ABCDEF, respectively) and significantly higher precision was seen in group ABCDEF (p <.001). For four and five implants (group BCDE and BCDEF), there was no significant difference comparing IOS with O-I buckle and CI (p >.05). As the range expanded, the trueness and precision of IOS and OI decreased (p <.05), whereas the accuracy of CI remained stable.
Conclusions: The auxiliary O-I buckle fixed to the ISBs significantly improved the multiple-implant intraoral scanning accuracy for digital impressions in complete arches; With CI as a reference, the accuracy of IOS with OI buckles were comparable for four and five implants.
Clinical relevance: The digitization accuracy of intraoral scanning for complete edentulous arches can be improved through IOS with OI buckles. This may lead to improved passive fit of the restoration, improving patient outcomes in a convenient and cheap way.
期刊介绍：
Head & Face Medicine is a multidisciplinary open access journal that publishes basic and clinical research concerning all aspects of cranial, facial and oral conditions.
The journal covers all aspects of cranial, facial and oral diseases and their management. It has been designed as a multidisciplinary journal for clinicians and researchers involved in the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of diseases which affect the human head and face. The journal is wide-ranging, covering the development, aetiology, epidemiology and therapy of head and face diseases to the basic science that underlies these diseases. Management of head and face diseases includes all aspects of surgical and non-surgical treatments including psychopharmacological therapies.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
