端到端吻合与ECHELON ENDOPATH™钉线加固治疗右侧结肠癌:安全性和可行性

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
In vivo Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.21873/invivo.13957
Yasuhiro Ishiyama, Yasumitsu Hirano, Megumi Sasaki, Sohei Akuta, Masatoshi Yoshizawa, Misuzu Yamato, Akihito Nakanishi, Yume Minagawa, Hisashi Hayashi, Takatsugu Fujii, Naoto Okazaki, Toshimasa Ishii, Chikashi Hiranuma
{"title":"端到端吻合与ECHELON ENDOPATH™钉线加固治疗右侧结肠癌:安全性和可行性","authors":"Yasuhiro Ishiyama, Yasumitsu Hirano, Megumi Sasaki, Sohei Akuta, Masatoshi Yoshizawa, Misuzu Yamato, Akihito Nakanishi, Yume Minagawa, Hisashi Hayashi, Takatsugu Fujii, Naoto Okazaki, Toshimasa Ishii, Chikashi Hiranuma","doi":"10.21873/invivo.13957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Functional end-to-end anastomosis (FEEA) is widely utilized in right-sided colorectal cancer surgery for joining the colon and ileum using mechanical staplers. ECHELON ENDOPATH™ Staple Line Reinforcement (SLR), a synthetic absorbable material introduced in 2020, represents a novel approach to reinforcing the anastomosis. However, surgical outcomes of FEEA utilizing SLR remain unreported in the literature. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FEEA with SLR compared to conventional FEEA in elective right-sided colon cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 159 consecutive patients who underwent elective surgery for right-sided colon cancer at our institution between February 2019 and December 2022. Short-term surgical outcomes were compared between cohorts receiving FEEA with and without SLR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis revealed no significant differences between groups in operative time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay duration, or overall complication rates. The SLR group demonstrated a significantly higher proportion of robotic surgical procedures (<i>p</i><0.001). Intraoperative staple line intervention was less frequently required in the SLR group (<i>p</i>=0.012). While one case of postoperative anastomotic leakage was documented in the non-SLR group, no such complications were observed in the SLR group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SLR represents a safe and effective adjunctive technique for FEEA in right-sided colon cancer surgery. Further validation through larger prospective studies is warranted to confirm these preliminary results.</p>","PeriodicalId":13364,"journal":{"name":"In vivo","volume":"39 3","pages":"1573-1579"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12041969/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"End-to-end Anastomosis With ECHELON ENDOPATH™ Staple Line Reinforcement for Right-sided Colon Cancer: Safety and Feasibility.\",\"authors\":\"Yasuhiro Ishiyama, Yasumitsu Hirano, Megumi Sasaki, Sohei Akuta, Masatoshi Yoshizawa, Misuzu Yamato, Akihito Nakanishi, Yume Minagawa, Hisashi Hayashi, Takatsugu Fujii, Naoto Okazaki, Toshimasa Ishii, Chikashi Hiranuma\",\"doi\":\"10.21873/invivo.13957\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Functional end-to-end anastomosis (FEEA) is widely utilized in right-sided colorectal cancer surgery for joining the colon and ileum using mechanical staplers. ECHELON ENDOPATH™ Staple Line Reinforcement (SLR), a synthetic absorbable material introduced in 2020, represents a novel approach to reinforcing the anastomosis. However, surgical outcomes of FEEA utilizing SLR remain unreported in the literature. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FEEA with SLR compared to conventional FEEA in elective right-sided colon cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 159 consecutive patients who underwent elective surgery for right-sided colon cancer at our institution between February 2019 and December 2022. Short-term surgical outcomes were compared between cohorts receiving FEEA with and without SLR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis revealed no significant differences between groups in operative time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay duration, or overall complication rates. The SLR group demonstrated a significantly higher proportion of robotic surgical procedures (<i>p</i><0.001). Intraoperative staple line intervention was less frequently required in the SLR group (<i>p</i>=0.012). While one case of postoperative anastomotic leakage was documented in the non-SLR group, no such complications were observed in the SLR group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SLR represents a safe and effective adjunctive technique for FEEA in right-sided colon cancer surgery. Further validation through larger prospective studies is warranted to confirm these preliminary results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"In vivo\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"1573-1579\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12041969/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"In vivo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13957\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In vivo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13957","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:功能性端到端吻合术(FEEA)广泛应用于右侧结直肠癌手术中,使用机械吻合器连接结肠和回肠。ECHELON ENDOPATH™Staple Line Reinforcement (SLR)是一种合成可吸收材料,于2020年推出,代表了一种加强吻合的新方法。然而,使用单反成像的FEEA手术结果在文献中尚未报道。本回顾性研究旨在评价FEEA联合SLR与传统FEEA在选择性右侧结肠癌手术中的疗效和安全性。患者和方法:我们对2019年2月至2022年12月在我院连续接受右侧结肠癌选择性手术的159例患者进行了回顾性分析。比较两组接受FEEA伴SLR和不伴SLR的患者的短期手术结果。结果:分析显示两组在手术时间、出血量、术后住院时间或总并发症发生率方面无显著差异。SLR组机器人手术的比例明显更高(pp=0.012)。非SLR组有1例术后吻合口漏,SLR组无吻合口漏并发症。结论:SLR是右侧结肠癌手术中安全有效的辅助FEEA技术。有必要通过更大规模的前瞻性研究进一步验证这些初步结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
End-to-end Anastomosis With ECHELON ENDOPATH™ Staple Line Reinforcement for Right-sided Colon Cancer: Safety and Feasibility.

Background/aim: Functional end-to-end anastomosis (FEEA) is widely utilized in right-sided colorectal cancer surgery for joining the colon and ileum using mechanical staplers. ECHELON ENDOPATH™ Staple Line Reinforcement (SLR), a synthetic absorbable material introduced in 2020, represents a novel approach to reinforcing the anastomosis. However, surgical outcomes of FEEA utilizing SLR remain unreported in the literature. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FEEA with SLR compared to conventional FEEA in elective right-sided colon cancer surgery.

Patients and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 159 consecutive patients who underwent elective surgery for right-sided colon cancer at our institution between February 2019 and December 2022. Short-term surgical outcomes were compared between cohorts receiving FEEA with and without SLR.

Results: Analysis revealed no significant differences between groups in operative time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay duration, or overall complication rates. The SLR group demonstrated a significantly higher proportion of robotic surgical procedures (p<0.001). Intraoperative staple line intervention was less frequently required in the SLR group (p=0.012). While one case of postoperative anastomotic leakage was documented in the non-SLR group, no such complications were observed in the SLR group.

Conclusion: SLR represents a safe and effective adjunctive technique for FEEA in right-sided colon cancer surgery. Further validation through larger prospective studies is warranted to confirm these preliminary results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
In vivo
In vivo 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
330
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IN VIVO is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to bring together original high quality works and reviews on experimental and clinical biomedical research within the frames of physiology, pathology and disease management. The topics of IN VIVO include: 1. Experimental development and application of new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures; 2. Pharmacological and toxicological evaluation of new drugs, drug combinations and drug delivery systems; 3. Clinical trials; 4. Development and characterization of models of biomedical research; 5. Cancer diagnosis and treatment; 6. Immunotherapy and vaccines; 7. Radiotherapy, Imaging; 8. Tissue engineering, Regenerative medicine; 9. Carcinogenesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信