Hansa Mreyoud, Linda Fitzgerald, Jeong M Park, Elizabeth Wilpula, Elizabeth Belloli, Krysta Walter
{"title":"老年肺移植受者抗代谢物不耐受的评估。","authors":"Hansa Mreyoud, Linda Fitzgerald, Jeong M Park, Elizabeth Wilpula, Elizabeth Belloli, Krysta Walter","doi":"10.1177/15269248251327419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Adverse effects from antimetabolites often lead to therapy adjustments; older patients may be more susceptible to these effects. <b>Project Aims:</b> Compare the intolerance of antimetabolites between older and younger lung transplant recipients. <b>Design:</b> A single-center, retrospective analysis of adult lung transplant recipients transplanted between January 1, 2019 and October 31, 2021 was conducted. Patients were stratified by age at the time of transplant (≥60 or <60 years) and assessed for the first year posttransplant. The primary outcome was the incidence of antimetabolite intolerance (defined as dose adjustment, agent/formulation change, or holding/discontinuation of agent). Secondary outcomes included reason for intolerance, safety (infection and leukopenia), and efficacy (rejection and patient/graft survival). <b>Results:</b> One hundred and nine recipients were included; 54 in the older (≥60 years) and 55 in the younger (<60 years) cohort. Most were initiated on azathioprine (74%) posttransplant. Antimetabolite intolerance occurred in 61% of older and 53% of younger recipients (<i>P</i> = 0.377). The most common reasons for intolerance were leukopenia followed by gastrointestinal side effects. Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred more often in the older cohort (39% vs 18%, <i>P</i> = 0.017); this no longer remained significant when controlling for induction, indication, transplant type, gender, and antimetabolite intolerance (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.15). There was no difference in the incidence of leukopenia, bacterial infection, or graft/patient survival within 1 year posttransplant. <b>Conclusion:</b> Antimetabolite intolerance between older and younger lung transplant recipients was similar. Most required modification to the initial antimetabolite regimen due to leukopenia and gastrointestinal side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"15269248251327419"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Antimetabolite Intolerance in Older Lung Transplant Recipients.\",\"authors\":\"Hansa Mreyoud, Linda Fitzgerald, Jeong M Park, Elizabeth Wilpula, Elizabeth Belloli, Krysta Walter\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15269248251327419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Adverse effects from antimetabolites often lead to therapy adjustments; older patients may be more susceptible to these effects. <b>Project Aims:</b> Compare the intolerance of antimetabolites between older and younger lung transplant recipients. <b>Design:</b> A single-center, retrospective analysis of adult lung transplant recipients transplanted between January 1, 2019 and October 31, 2021 was conducted. Patients were stratified by age at the time of transplant (≥60 or <60 years) and assessed for the first year posttransplant. The primary outcome was the incidence of antimetabolite intolerance (defined as dose adjustment, agent/formulation change, or holding/discontinuation of agent). Secondary outcomes included reason for intolerance, safety (infection and leukopenia), and efficacy (rejection and patient/graft survival). <b>Results:</b> One hundred and nine recipients were included; 54 in the older (≥60 years) and 55 in the younger (<60 years) cohort. Most were initiated on azathioprine (74%) posttransplant. Antimetabolite intolerance occurred in 61% of older and 53% of younger recipients (<i>P</i> = 0.377). The most common reasons for intolerance were leukopenia followed by gastrointestinal side effects. Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred more often in the older cohort (39% vs 18%, <i>P</i> = 0.017); this no longer remained significant when controlling for induction, indication, transplant type, gender, and antimetabolite intolerance (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.15). There was no difference in the incidence of leukopenia, bacterial infection, or graft/patient survival within 1 year posttransplant. <b>Conclusion:</b> Antimetabolite intolerance between older and younger lung transplant recipients was similar. Most required modification to the initial antimetabolite regimen due to leukopenia and gastrointestinal side effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Transplantation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15269248251327419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248251327419\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248251327419","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:抗代谢物的不良反应往往导致治疗调整;老年患者可能更容易受到这些影响。项目目的:比较老年和年轻肺移植受者对抗代谢物的不耐受。设计:对2019年1月1日至2021年10月31日移植的成人肺移植受者进行单中心回顾性分析。患者按移植时的年龄(≥60岁)进行分层。结果:纳入109例受者;老年人(≥60岁)54例,年轻人55例(P = 0.377)。最常见的不耐受原因是白细胞减少,其次是胃肠道副作用。活检证实的急性排斥反应在老年队列中更常见(39% vs 18%, P = 0.017);当控制诱导、适应症、移植类型、性别和抗代谢物不耐受时,这一结果不再显著(OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.11 ~ 1.15)。在白细胞减少、细菌感染或移植后1年内移植/患者生存率方面没有差异。结论:老年和年轻肺移植受者抗代谢物不耐受相似。由于白细胞减少和胃肠道副作用,大多数需要修改初始抗代谢物方案。
Assessment of Antimetabolite Intolerance in Older Lung Transplant Recipients.
Introduction: Adverse effects from antimetabolites often lead to therapy adjustments; older patients may be more susceptible to these effects. Project Aims: Compare the intolerance of antimetabolites between older and younger lung transplant recipients. Design: A single-center, retrospective analysis of adult lung transplant recipients transplanted between January 1, 2019 and October 31, 2021 was conducted. Patients were stratified by age at the time of transplant (≥60 or <60 years) and assessed for the first year posttransplant. The primary outcome was the incidence of antimetabolite intolerance (defined as dose adjustment, agent/formulation change, or holding/discontinuation of agent). Secondary outcomes included reason for intolerance, safety (infection and leukopenia), and efficacy (rejection and patient/graft survival). Results: One hundred and nine recipients were included; 54 in the older (≥60 years) and 55 in the younger (<60 years) cohort. Most were initiated on azathioprine (74%) posttransplant. Antimetabolite intolerance occurred in 61% of older and 53% of younger recipients (P = 0.377). The most common reasons for intolerance were leukopenia followed by gastrointestinal side effects. Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred more often in the older cohort (39% vs 18%, P = 0.017); this no longer remained significant when controlling for induction, indication, transplant type, gender, and antimetabolite intolerance (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.15). There was no difference in the incidence of leukopenia, bacterial infection, or graft/patient survival within 1 year posttransplant. Conclusion: Antimetabolite intolerance between older and younger lung transplant recipients was similar. Most required modification to the initial antimetabolite regimen due to leukopenia and gastrointestinal side effects.
期刊介绍:
Progress in Transplantation (PIT) is the official journal of NATCO, The Organization for Transplant Professionals. Journal Partners include: Australasian Transplant Coordinators Association and Society for Transplant Social Workers. PIT reflects the multi-disciplinary team approach to procurement and clinical aspects of organ and tissue transplantation by providing a professional forum for exchange of the continually changing body of knowledge in transplantation.