27号广角观察系统及凹槽针在巩膜屈曲术中引流视网膜下液治疗孔源性视网膜脱离。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Lijun Xie, Gang Qiao, Xiaojuan Zhang, Ziyan Tang, Qiangxing Zou, Chunmei He, Kui Cao, Wanjiang Dong, Wenyong Liao, Dongbin Chen
{"title":"27号广角观察系统及凹槽针在巩膜屈曲术中引流视网膜下液治疗孔源性视网膜脱离。","authors":"Lijun Xie, Gang Qiao, Xiaojuan Zhang, Ziyan Tang, Qiangxing Zou, Chunmei He, Kui Cao, Wanjiang Dong, Wenyong Liao, Dongbin Chen","doi":"10.1007/s10792-025-03533-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the clinical therapeutic effects and advantages of internal drainage of subretinal fluid using a 27-gauge wide-angle viewing system(WAVS) and a flute needle compared with external drainage of subretinal fluid (SRF) during scleral buckling for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective randomized case series at two hospitals, we evaluated 43 eyes of 43 patients with RRD who were divided into two groups, A and B. Twenty-two eyes (22 patients) in Group A underwent internal drainage of subretinal fluid with a 27-gauge WAVS and a flute needle, whereas 21 eyes (21 patients) in Group B underwent external drainage of subretinal fluid during scleral buckling surgery. The duration of surgery, rates of retinal reattachment, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOPs), occurrence of recurrent RRD, and risk factors of intraoperative or postoperative complications, including subretinal hemorrhage, vitreous hemorrhage, persistent subretinal fluid, postoperative retinal tear, choroidal detachment, vitreous loss, vitreous and retinal incarceration, cystoid macular edema, cataract, glaucoma, and endophthalmitis, of both groups were collected and compared. We followed up these patients for six months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean operating time of Group A (53.36 ± 6.19 min) was significantly shorter than Group B (61.24 ± 6.84 min) (P = 0.00). The final anatomical success rates were 100%(22/22) and 90.48%(19/21) in Group A and B, respectively (P = 0.14). All detached retinas in Group A reattached before the final follow-up, and no intraoperative or postoperative complications were detected. In Group B, 2(9.52%, 2/21) underwent a second vitrectomy surgery because of subretinal hemorrhage during external drainage of the subretinal fluid. However, the retinas of both eyes reattached at the end of the final follow-up. However, there were two (9.52%, 2/21) other eyes' retinas in Group B that had not completely reattached due to persistent subretinal fluid at the end of this study. The final mean BCVA of Group A (0.21 ± 0.15) was significantly superior to that of Group B(0.39 ± 0.35)(P = 0.04). The intraocular pressure in all the patients was within the normal range throughout the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although limited by the small sample size, this study suggests that internal drainage of subretinal fluid during scleral buckling with 27-gauge WAVS and flute needle showed advantages superior to external drainage of subretinal fluid in scleral buckling surgery, including increased efficiency and decreased amount of SRF, shortened duration of persistent subretinal fluid, and reduced rate of subretinal hemorrhage.</p>","PeriodicalId":14473,"journal":{"name":"International Ophthalmology","volume":"45 1","pages":"159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12049303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Internal drainage of subretinal fluid during scleral buckling with 27-Gauge wide angle viewing system and flute needle for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.\",\"authors\":\"Lijun Xie, Gang Qiao, Xiaojuan Zhang, Ziyan Tang, Qiangxing Zou, Chunmei He, Kui Cao, Wanjiang Dong, Wenyong Liao, Dongbin Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10792-025-03533-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the clinical therapeutic effects and advantages of internal drainage of subretinal fluid using a 27-gauge wide-angle viewing system(WAVS) and a flute needle compared with external drainage of subretinal fluid (SRF) during scleral buckling for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective randomized case series at two hospitals, we evaluated 43 eyes of 43 patients with RRD who were divided into two groups, A and B. Twenty-two eyes (22 patients) in Group A underwent internal drainage of subretinal fluid with a 27-gauge WAVS and a flute needle, whereas 21 eyes (21 patients) in Group B underwent external drainage of subretinal fluid during scleral buckling surgery. The duration of surgery, rates of retinal reattachment, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOPs), occurrence of recurrent RRD, and risk factors of intraoperative or postoperative complications, including subretinal hemorrhage, vitreous hemorrhage, persistent subretinal fluid, postoperative retinal tear, choroidal detachment, vitreous loss, vitreous and retinal incarceration, cystoid macular edema, cataract, glaucoma, and endophthalmitis, of both groups were collected and compared. We followed up these patients for six months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean operating time of Group A (53.36 ± 6.19 min) was significantly shorter than Group B (61.24 ± 6.84 min) (P = 0.00). The final anatomical success rates were 100%(22/22) and 90.48%(19/21) in Group A and B, respectively (P = 0.14). All detached retinas in Group A reattached before the final follow-up, and no intraoperative or postoperative complications were detected. In Group B, 2(9.52%, 2/21) underwent a second vitrectomy surgery because of subretinal hemorrhage during external drainage of the subretinal fluid. However, the retinas of both eyes reattached at the end of the final follow-up. However, there were two (9.52%, 2/21) other eyes' retinas in Group B that had not completely reattached due to persistent subretinal fluid at the end of this study. The final mean BCVA of Group A (0.21 ± 0.15) was significantly superior to that of Group B(0.39 ± 0.35)(P = 0.04). The intraocular pressure in all the patients was within the normal range throughout the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although limited by the small sample size, this study suggests that internal drainage of subretinal fluid during scleral buckling with 27-gauge WAVS and flute needle showed advantages superior to external drainage of subretinal fluid in scleral buckling surgery, including increased efficiency and decreased amount of SRF, shortened duration of persistent subretinal fluid, and reduced rate of subretinal hemorrhage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12049303/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-025-03533-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-025-03533-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价27号广角观察系统(WAVS)和凹槽针内引流视网膜下液与巩膜屈曲术外引流视网膜下液治疗孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)的临床疗效及优势。方法:在两家医院的前瞻性随机病例系列中,我们评估了43例RRD患者的43只眼,将其分为A和B两组,A组22只眼(22例)采用27号WAVS和笛形针进行视网膜下液内引流,B组21只眼(21例)在巩膜扣带手术中进行视网膜下液外引流。手术时间、视网膜再附着率、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、眼压(IOPs)、复发性RRD的发生率以及术中或术后并发症的危险因素,包括视网膜下出血、玻璃体出血、持续视网膜下积液、术后视网膜撕裂、脉络膜脱离、玻璃体丢失、玻璃体和视网膜嵌塞、囊样黄斑水肿、白内障、青光眼和眼内炎。收集两组的数据进行比较。我们在手术后对这些病人进行了六个月的随访。结果:A组平均手术时间(53.36±6.19 min)明显短于B组(61.24±6.84 min) (P = 0.00)。A组和B组最终解剖成功率分别为100%(22/22)和90.48%(19/21)(P = 0.14)。A组所有脱离的视网膜均在最后随访前重新附着,无术中及术后并发症。B组2例(9.52%,2/21)因视网膜下液外引流时视网膜下出血行第二次玻璃体切除手术。然而,在最后的随访结束时,两只眼睛的视网膜重新附着。然而,在本研究结束时,B组还有2只眼(9.52%,2/21)的视网膜因持续存在视网膜下积液而未完全附着。A组最终平均BCVA(0.21±0.15)显著优于B组(0.39±0.35)(P = 0.04)。在整个研究过程中,所有患者的眼压均在正常范围内。结论:虽然受限于样本量小,但本研究表明,在巩膜屈曲术中,27号WAVS和凹槽针内引流视网膜下液优于外引流视网膜下液,包括提高效率和减少SRF量,缩短视网膜下液持续时间,降低视网膜下出血率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Internal drainage of subretinal fluid during scleral buckling with 27-Gauge wide angle viewing system and flute needle for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical therapeutic effects and advantages of internal drainage of subretinal fluid using a 27-gauge wide-angle viewing system(WAVS) and a flute needle compared with external drainage of subretinal fluid (SRF) during scleral buckling for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

Methods: In this prospective randomized case series at two hospitals, we evaluated 43 eyes of 43 patients with RRD who were divided into two groups, A and B. Twenty-two eyes (22 patients) in Group A underwent internal drainage of subretinal fluid with a 27-gauge WAVS and a flute needle, whereas 21 eyes (21 patients) in Group B underwent external drainage of subretinal fluid during scleral buckling surgery. The duration of surgery, rates of retinal reattachment, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOPs), occurrence of recurrent RRD, and risk factors of intraoperative or postoperative complications, including subretinal hemorrhage, vitreous hemorrhage, persistent subretinal fluid, postoperative retinal tear, choroidal detachment, vitreous loss, vitreous and retinal incarceration, cystoid macular edema, cataract, glaucoma, and endophthalmitis, of both groups were collected and compared. We followed up these patients for six months after surgery.

Results: The mean operating time of Group A (53.36 ± 6.19 min) was significantly shorter than Group B (61.24 ± 6.84 min) (P = 0.00). The final anatomical success rates were 100%(22/22) and 90.48%(19/21) in Group A and B, respectively (P = 0.14). All detached retinas in Group A reattached before the final follow-up, and no intraoperative or postoperative complications were detected. In Group B, 2(9.52%, 2/21) underwent a second vitrectomy surgery because of subretinal hemorrhage during external drainage of the subretinal fluid. However, the retinas of both eyes reattached at the end of the final follow-up. However, there were two (9.52%, 2/21) other eyes' retinas in Group B that had not completely reattached due to persistent subretinal fluid at the end of this study. The final mean BCVA of Group A (0.21 ± 0.15) was significantly superior to that of Group B(0.39 ± 0.35)(P = 0.04). The intraocular pressure in all the patients was within the normal range throughout the study.

Conclusion: Although limited by the small sample size, this study suggests that internal drainage of subretinal fluid during scleral buckling with 27-gauge WAVS and flute needle showed advantages superior to external drainage of subretinal fluid in scleral buckling surgery, including increased efficiency and decreased amount of SRF, shortened duration of persistent subretinal fluid, and reduced rate of subretinal hemorrhage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
451
期刊介绍: International Ophthalmology provides the clinician with articles on all the relevant subspecialties of ophthalmology, with a broad international scope. The emphasis is on presentation of the latest clinical research in the field. In addition, the journal includes regular sections devoted to new developments in technologies, products, and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信