共同设计解决高等教育中粮食不安全问题的解决方案:范围审查。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Taylah Scutts, Nadia Farnaz, Gantsetseg Ganbold, Alexandra J Bhatti, Shirley Phan, Miriam J Williams, Seema Mihrshahi
{"title":"共同设计解决高等教育中粮食不安全问题的解决方案:范围审查。","authors":"Taylah Scutts, Nadia Farnaz, Gantsetseg Ganbold, Alexandra J Bhatti, Shirley Phan, Miriam J Williams, Seema Mihrshahi","doi":"10.1017/S1368980025000485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Food insecurity (FI) in the higher education setting is a pressing social justice and public health nutrition issue. Persistent FI rates among students suggest that the current programmes and institutional policies are inadequate. Engaging the community in co-design practices can enhance research and decision-making, leading to more targeted advocacy and solutions. This review describes and evaluates evidence of co-design approaches and identifies strategies for addressing FI in higher education settings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Literature was searched in three electronic databases (Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE and Web of Science) and two search engines (Google and Google Scholar).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Only studies based in higher education settings were included.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Higher education students.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 814 studies, of which twenty-eight met the inclusion criteria. Studies involving co-design and participatory research frameworks had higher participation, leading to increased student awareness of FI, student leadership and the development of campaigns and collaborative organisational structures. A content analysis approach identified seven categories for strategies targeting student FI: (1) policy and institutional support; (2) strategic partnerships (3) advocacy and awareness; (4) initiatives for student engagement; (5) student skills and knowledge development; (6) programme development and (7) campus food environment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Co-designed research methodologies are important for addressing student FI, enhancing advocacy and understanding stakeholder needs. Future studies should prioritise collaborative approaches when exploring solutions to FI and similar social justice issues affecting students.</p>","PeriodicalId":20951,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"e80"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12100566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-designing solutions to tackle food insecurity in higher education settings: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Taylah Scutts, Nadia Farnaz, Gantsetseg Ganbold, Alexandra J Bhatti, Shirley Phan, Miriam J Williams, Seema Mihrshahi\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1368980025000485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Food insecurity (FI) in the higher education setting is a pressing social justice and public health nutrition issue. Persistent FI rates among students suggest that the current programmes and institutional policies are inadequate. Engaging the community in co-design practices can enhance research and decision-making, leading to more targeted advocacy and solutions. This review describes and evaluates evidence of co-design approaches and identifies strategies for addressing FI in higher education settings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Literature was searched in three electronic databases (Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE and Web of Science) and two search engines (Google and Google Scholar).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Only studies based in higher education settings were included.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Higher education students.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 814 studies, of which twenty-eight met the inclusion criteria. Studies involving co-design and participatory research frameworks had higher participation, leading to increased student awareness of FI, student leadership and the development of campaigns and collaborative organisational structures. A content analysis approach identified seven categories for strategies targeting student FI: (1) policy and institutional support; (2) strategic partnerships (3) advocacy and awareness; (4) initiatives for student engagement; (5) student skills and knowledge development; (6) programme development and (7) campus food environment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Co-designed research methodologies are important for addressing student FI, enhancing advocacy and understanding stakeholder needs. Future studies should prioritise collaborative approaches when exploring solutions to FI and similar social justice issues affecting students.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Health Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12100566/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Health Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980025000485\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980025000485","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:高等教育环境中的粮食不安全(FI)是一个紧迫的社会正义和公共卫生营养问题。学生中持续的FI率表明,目前的计划和制度政策是不够的。让社区参与共同设计实践可以加强研究和决策,从而产生更有针对性的倡导和解决方案。这篇综述描述和评估了共同设计方法的证据,并确定了在高等教育环境中解决FI的策略。设计:使用系统评价的首选报告项目和范围评价的元分析扩展进行评价。文献在三个电子数据库(Scopus、Ovid MEDLINE和Web of Science)和两个搜索引擎(谷歌和谷歌Scholar)中检索。环境:仅包括高等教育环境下的研究。参与者:高等教育学生。结果:检索到814项研究,其中28项符合纳入标准。涉及共同设计和参与式研究框架的研究参与率更高,从而提高了学生对FI、学生领导力以及运动和协作组织结构的认识。内容分析方法确定了针对学生FI的七种策略:1)政策和制度支持;2)战略伙伴关系3)宣传和认识;4)促进学生参与的措施;5)学生技能和知识的发展;6)程序开发;7)校园饮食环境。结论:共同设计的研究方法对于解决学生FI,加强宣传和理解利益相关者的需求非常重要。未来的研究在探索FI和影响学生的类似社会正义问题的解决方案时应优先考虑合作方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Co-designing solutions to tackle food insecurity in higher education settings: a scoping review.

Objective: Food insecurity (FI) in the higher education setting is a pressing social justice and public health nutrition issue. Persistent FI rates among students suggest that the current programmes and institutional policies are inadequate. Engaging the community in co-design practices can enhance research and decision-making, leading to more targeted advocacy and solutions. This review describes and evaluates evidence of co-design approaches and identifies strategies for addressing FI in higher education settings.

Design: A review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Literature was searched in three electronic databases (Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE and Web of Science) and two search engines (Google and Google Scholar).

Setting: Only studies based in higher education settings were included.

Participants: Higher education students.

Results: The search identified 814 studies, of which twenty-eight met the inclusion criteria. Studies involving co-design and participatory research frameworks had higher participation, leading to increased student awareness of FI, student leadership and the development of campaigns and collaborative organisational structures. A content analysis approach identified seven categories for strategies targeting student FI: (1) policy and institutional support; (2) strategic partnerships (3) advocacy and awareness; (4) initiatives for student engagement; (5) student skills and knowledge development; (6) programme development and (7) campus food environment.

Conclusions: Co-designed research methodologies are important for addressing student FI, enhancing advocacy and understanding stakeholder needs. Future studies should prioritise collaborative approaches when exploring solutions to FI and similar social justice issues affecting students.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Nutrition
Public Health Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
521
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Public Health Nutrition provides an international peer-reviewed forum for the publication and dissemination of research and scholarship aimed at understanding the causes of, and approaches and solutions to nutrition-related public health achievements, situations and problems around the world. The journal publishes original and commissioned articles, commentaries and discussion papers for debate. The journal is of interest to epidemiologists and health promotion specialists interested in the role of nutrition in disease prevention; academics and those involved in fieldwork and the application of research to identify practical solutions to important public health problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信